Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.gui > #5195
| From | Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.gui |
| Subject | Re: Overriding JComponent or implementing ComponentUI? |
| Date | 2012-07-10 13:25 -0700 |
| Organization | http://groups.google.com |
| Message-ID | <2e32e65c-5e3a-404b-983f-6881d93d3748@googlegroups.com> (permalink) |
| References | <kN1Ir.59786$GJ4.56436@newsfe16.iad> <jtfqbg$4uo$1@dont-email.me> <jtgi6o$va0$1@news.albasani.net> <jthrmi$qu3$1@dont-email.me> |
Daniele Futtorovic wrote: > Lew allegedly wrote: > > Daniele Futtorovic wrote: > >> FWIW (as it's been a while I've done GUI code), the more complex and > >> specialised custom components I wrote, the further I lent towards > >> ComponentUIs. Unfortunately, I don't remember any exact benefit. Perhaps > >> a matter of cleanness and encapsulation (as it feels "more right" to put > >> that code in a dedicated place, rather than overriding stuff in the > >> component). There's also the issue of shared resources, although those > >> can be dealt with similarly in JComponent. > >> > >> I realise that was a terribly useless post. Sorry about that. :) > > > > Honestly, I thought it was going to be useless for a second, but it > > turned out to be rather thought-provoking and best-practice oriented. > > > > Assuming I understood your remarks correctly. > > > > Josh Bloch says, "Prefer composition to inheritance." > > > > In GUI terms this translates to, "Usually you have a JFrame as a member > > rather than as a supertype." > > > > Indeed the good man does, and indeed the good man is right. But I would > have liked to be able to find in my experience a pratical illustration > of that bit of wisdom. For, while trust may be fine, knowledge is good. :} Well, the bit about making a JFrame a member rather than supertype is a practical illustration. -- Lew
Back to comp.lang.java.gui | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar
Overriding JComponent or implementing ComponentUI? Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2012-07-01 12:45 -0700
Re: Overriding JComponent or implementing ComponentUI? "John B. Matthews" <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2012-07-01 20:11 -0400
Re: Overriding JComponent or implementing ComponentUI? Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2012-07-05 07:40 -0700
Re: Overriding JComponent or implementing ComponentUI? "John B. Matthews" <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2012-07-05 21:11 -0400
Re: Overriding JComponent or implementing ComponentUI? "John B. Matthews" <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2012-07-05 21:06 -0400
Re: Overriding JComponent or implementing ComponentUI? Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> - 2012-07-10 01:42 +0200
Re: Overriding JComponent or implementing ComponentUI? Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2012-07-09 23:30 -0700
Re: Overriding JComponent or implementing ComponentUI? Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> - 2012-07-10 20:18 +0200
Re: Overriding JComponent or implementing ComponentUI? Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-07-10 13:25 -0700
csiph-web