Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.forth > #10498
| From | Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: why not inline comments in colorforth/arrayforth? |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.forth |
| References | <62b8f851-312a-41e1-a56e-3bd808e10876@r2g2000pbs.googlegroups.com> |
| Message-ID | <wb-dnXKH5OpLpe3SnZ2dnUVZ_rSdnZ2d@supernews.com> (permalink) |
| Date | 2012-03-26 04:37 -0500 |
jc <john.comeau@gmail.com> wrote: > instead of the ancient 'shadow blocks' wouldn't it make more sense to > use inline comments in cf code? Inline comments get in the way. The great advance of shadows was that they didn't get in the way. A smart editor could do the same thing. Andrew.
Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
why not inline comments in colorforth/arrayforth? jc <john.comeau@gmail.com> - 2012-03-26 01:59 -0700
Re: why not inline comments in colorforth/arrayforth? "Ray St. Marie" <ray.stmarie@gmail.com> - 2012-03-26 02:27 -0700
Re: why not inline comments in colorforth/arrayforth? Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2012-03-26 04:37 -0500
Re: why not inline comments in colorforth/arrayforth? Doug Hoffman <glidedog@gmail.com> - 2012-03-26 06:50 -0400
Re: why not inline comments in colorforth/arrayforth? Helmar Wodtke <helmwo@gmail.com> - 2012-03-26 05:08 -0700
Re: why not inline comments in colorforth/arrayforth? "Ray St. Marie" <ray.stmarie@gmail.com> - 2012-03-26 05:52 -0700
Re: why not inline comments in colorforth/arrayforth? jc <john.comeau@gmail.com> - 2012-03-26 21:47 -0700
Re: why not inline comments in colorforth/arrayforth? Doug Hoffman <glidedog@gmail.com> - 2012-03-27 07:15 -0400
Re: why not inline comments in colorforth/arrayforth? "Ray St. Marie" <ray.stmarie@gmail.com> - 2012-03-27 06:21 -0700
csiph-web