Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.forth > #22596
| From | lynx <rinkasu@kaze.void.null> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.forth |
| Subject | Re: There are myriads of posts mentioning Robots, but what about FIRST? |
| Date | 2013-05-14 19:30 +0000 |
| Organization | PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC |
| Message-ID | <kmu3dg$66a$1@reader1.panix.com> (permalink) |
| References | <b1fa1896-af08-4bd7-917f-08c68bb0a0b5@googlegroups.com> |
In <b1fa1896-af08-4bd7-917f-08c68bb0a0b5@googlegroups.com> visualforth@rocketmail.com writes: >Forth is the ideal language for Robots, but it is not used at FIRST. >There are thousands of high school students participating at FIRST competitions, and NI is dominating the Robot control with LabView, C++ and Java: >FIRST and NI Announce New Robot Controller: Smaller, Faster, Super Rugged >http://spectrum.ieee.org/automaton/robotics/robotics-hardware/first-robotics-competition-national-instruments-athena-robot-controller >What about a FIRST FORTH team? If FIRST has an agreement with NI to supply the software and hardware at a significant discount to enrolled teams--and especially if teams are required to use the NI device as the "core" of the robot with the included software--then it is a moot issue. But I don't know how much of this is true. Certainly it seems the expectation for other FIRST programs (if not with FRC) is that participants are expected to work from the appropriate kit they issue for the targeted age group (e.g., LEGO Mindstorms for students in primary school). More important than any of the technical aspects, the FRC program seems to draw largely upon the availability of volunteer technical "mentors" (e.g., professional programmers and engineers) to advise the students how to build a working robot. Are there Forthers out there who are ready to volunteer a huge amount of their time and expertise to assist students with building a robot? Probably. But they are unquestionably in the minority. The generic tools they package with robot kit makes the program accessible to a much larger pool of potential mentors. In my view, getting hung up on language choice misses the point of the FIRST program, although Forth would undoubtedly be an excellent option for students learning how to program a robot.
Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
There are myriads of posts mentioning Robots, but what about FIRST? visualforth@rocketmail.com - 2013-05-14 11:23 -0700
Re: There are myriads of posts mentioning Robots, but what about FIRST? lynx <rinkasu@kaze.void.null> - 2013-05-14 19:30 +0000
Re: There are myriads of posts mentioning Robots, but what about FIRST? visualforth@rocketmail.com - 2013-05-14 15:53 -0700
Re: There are myriads of posts mentioning Robots, but what about FIRST? visualforth@rocketmail.com - 2013-05-14 17:42 -0700
csiph-web