Re: MISC - Stack Based vs. Register Based

From	rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.forth
Subject	Re: MISC - Stack Based vs. Register Based
Date	2013-04-09 14:40 -0400
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<kk1n7a$dn$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References	(8 earlier) <d918219f-3e55-4780-99aa-13aafa018ba5@googlegroups.com> <515f1462$0$6861$e4fe514c@news2.news.xs4all.nl> <d2ae1029-d184-48b1-a4f9-751c547d6c2e@googlegroups.com> <kk17i1$10m$1@dont-email.me> <097c7869-5554-4cc5-8659-856c3429933d@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw

On 4/9/2013 11:55 AM, Brad Eckert wrote:
> On Tuesday, April 9, 2013 7:13:33 AM UTC-7, rickman wrote:
>> I'm not sure the code density comes from factoring and factoring does
>> not imply 16 bit calls.  Code density comes from matching the
>> instruction set to the task and using an instruction encoding that
>> optimizes the most frequency operations for length.
>
> Okay, compact calls.
>
> The J1's instruction coding isn't very dense, yet the resulting application is pretty compact. Or maybe the C/Microblaze combination is so awful that anything that can encode Forth is a vast improvement in code size.

I see what you are saying, certainly part of the J1 vs. uBlaze 
comparison is just the fact that the J1 is coded in Forth which is 
typically highly factored.  But I would not say the J1 coding isn't very 
dense.  The way they provide for multiple Forth primitives in a single 
J1 instruction helps the code density a lot I expect, but I'm not sure, 
for sure.

I don't want to spend a lot of time analyzing the J1, but I would like 
to understand it better.  Too bad I can't get all the insight into the 
effectiveness of the J1 instruction set by the Vulcan mind meld.

I did compare one of my early instruction set designs with something 16 
bits wide, I can't remember which processor.  It turned out my low 
functionality instructions required so many that it took up just as much 
instruction space and of course ran slower because it took so many more 
instructions.  I think that was before I started using the return stack 
as an address processor.  That change should have improved the 
instruction density significantly for loops and calls.

> The nice thing about running your CPU as an RTL (or other) model is that you can afford to heavily instrument it (count dynamic instruction use, etc) and tweak the instruction set as your application develops.

Yes...  that's very nice.

I think a lot of my problem is I haven't done a lot of actual 
programming for these designs, so I don't have much code to use for an 
analysis.  There is plenty of Forth code around, but to use that would 
require writing a compiler for each architecture I imagine.  That would 
be a lot of work.  So most of the analysis is done in spreadsheets.

-- 

Rick

Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

MISC - Stack Based vs. Register Based rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2013-03-29 17:00 -0400
  Re: MISC - Stack Based vs. Register Based glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2013-03-29 21:43 +0000
    Re: MISC - Stack Based vs. Register Based rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2013-03-29 20:28 -0400
      Re: MISC - Stack Based vs. Register Based glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2013-03-31 18:34 +0000
        Re: MISC - Stack Based vs. Register Based rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2013-04-02 09:54 -0400
          Re: MISC - Stack Based vs. Register Based glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2013-04-02 17:20 +0000
            Re: MISC - Stack Based vs. Register Based David Brown <david@westcontrol.removethisbit.com> - 2013-04-03 09:12 +0200
    Re: MISC - Stack Based vs. Register Based Jon Elson <jmelson@wustl.edu> - 2013-04-01 15:11 -0500
  Re: MISC - Stack Based vs. Register Based AKE <assadebrahim2000@gmail.com> - 2013-03-29 18:19 -0700
    Re: MISC - Stack Based vs. Register Based rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2013-03-30 18:50 -0400
      Re: MISC - Stack Based vs. Register Based Jecel <jecel@merlintec.com> - 2013-04-01 13:18 -0700
        Re: MISC - Stack Based vs. Register Based rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2013-04-02 10:50 -0400
          Re: MISC - Stack Based vs. Register Based Jecel <jecel@merlintec.com> - 2013-04-02 23:39 -0700
            Re: MISC - Stack Based vs. Register Based rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2013-04-03 09:54 -0400
              Re: MISC - Stack Based vs. Register Based Jecel <jecel@merlintec.com> - 2013-04-05 14:30 -0700
                Re: MISC - Stack Based vs. Register Based rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2013-04-05 17:53 -0400
                Re: MISC - Stack Based vs. Register Based Jecel <jecel@merlintec.com> - 2013-04-06 13:27 -0700
                Re: MISC - Stack Based vs. Register Based Jecel <jecel@merlintec.com> - 2013-04-06 13:37 -0700
        Re: MISC - Stack Based vs. Register Based Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-04-07 15:21 -0700
          Re: MISC - Stack Based vs. Register Based rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2013-04-08 01:24 -0400
            Re: MISC - Stack Based vs. Register Based Syd Rumpo <usenet@nononono.co.uk> - 2013-04-08 10:18 +0100
          Re: MISC - Stack Based vs. Register Based Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-04-08 04:18 -0500
  Re: MISC - Stack Based vs. Register Based Arlet Ottens <usenet+5@c-scape.nl> - 2013-03-30 08:20 +0100
    Re: MISC - Stack Based vs. Register Based rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2013-03-30 19:00 -0400
      Re: MISC - Stack Based vs. Register Based Arlet Ottens <usenet+5@c-scape.nl> - 2013-03-31 13:20 +0200
  Re: MISC - Stack Based vs. Register Based "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailnotq.cpm> - 2013-03-30 17:54 -0400
    Re: MISC - Stack Based vs. Register Based Arlet Ottens <usenet+5@c-scape.nl> - 2013-03-31 09:11 +0200
      Re: MISC - Stack Based vs. Register Based "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailnotq.cpm> - 2013-04-01 20:10 -0400
        Re: MISC - Stack Based vs. Register Based glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2013-04-02 00:54 +0000
          Re: MISC - Stack Based vs. Register Based rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2013-04-02 13:31 -0400
            Re: MISC - Stack Based vs. Register Based glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2013-04-02 19:03 +0000
        Re: MISC - Stack Based vs. Register Based Arlet Ottens <usenet+5@c-scape.nl> - 2013-04-02 08:25 +0200
          Re: MISC - Stack Based vs. Register Based rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2013-04-02 13:33 -0400
        Re: MISC - Stack Based vs. Register Based rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2013-04-02 13:26 -0400
          Re: MISC - Stack Based vs. Register Based "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailnotq.cpm> - 2013-04-03 20:34 -0400
            Re: MISC - Stack Based vs. Register Based glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2013-04-04 02:07 +0000
              Re: MISC - Stack Based vs. Register Based albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2013-04-04 11:16 +0000
                Re: MISC - Stack Based vs. Register Based Arlet Ottens <usenet+5@c-scape.nl> - 2013-04-04 13:25 +0200
                Re: MISC - Stack Based vs. Register Based glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2013-04-04 12:44 +0000
                Re: MISC - Stack Based vs. Register Based rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2013-04-04 17:04 -0400
                Re: MISC - Stack Based vs. Register Based glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2013-04-04 21:34 +0000
                Re: MISC - Stack Based vs. Register Based rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2013-04-04 19:30 -0400
                Re: MISC - Stack Based vs. Register Based Mark Wills <markrobertwills@yahoo.co.uk> - 2013-04-05 00:41 -0700
                Re: MISC - Stack Based vs. Register Based Alex McDonald <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2013-04-04 15:30 -0700
                Re: MISC - Stack Based vs. Register Based glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2013-04-04 23:15 +0000
                Re: MISC - Stack Based vs. Register Based Alex McDonald <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2013-04-04 17:26 -0700
                Re: MISC - Stack Based vs. Register Based albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2013-04-05 01:17 +0000
                Re: MISC - Stack Based vs. Register Based rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2013-04-05 18:00 -0400
                Re: MISC - Stack Based vs. Register Based "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailnotq.cpm> - 2013-04-08 23:55 -0400
                Re: MISC - Stack Based vs. Register Based rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2013-04-04 20:07 -0400
                Re: MISC - Stack Based vs. Register Based Mark Wills <markrobertwills@yahoo.co.uk> - 2013-04-05 00:51 -0700
                Re: MISC - Stack Based vs. Register Based Arlet Ottens <usenet+5@c-scape.nl> - 2013-04-05 14:31 +0200
                Re: MISC - Stack Based vs. Register Based Mark Wills <markrobertwills@yahoo.co.uk> - 2013-04-05 07:33 -0700
                Re: MISC - Stack Based vs. Register Based Arlet Ottens <usenet+5@c-scape.nl> - 2013-04-05 17:01 +0200
                Re: MISC - Stack Based vs. Register Based rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2013-04-05 18:25 -0400
                Re: MISC - Stack Based vs. Register Based rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2013-04-06 17:44 -0400
                Re: MISC - Stack Based vs. Register Based Brad Eckert <hwfwguy@gmail.com> - 2013-04-05 10:14 -0700
                Re: MISC - Stack Based vs. Register Based Arlet Ottens <usenet+5@c-scape.nl> - 2013-04-05 20:13 +0200
                Re: MISC - Stack Based vs. Register Based Arlet Ottens <usenet+5@c-scape.nl> - 2013-04-05 20:15 +0200
                Re: MISC - Stack Based vs. Register Based rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2013-04-05 18:54 -0400
                Re: MISC - Stack Based vs. Register Based Brad Eckert <hwfwguy@gmail.com> - 2013-04-08 09:57 -0700
                Re: MISC - Stack Based vs. Register Based rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2013-04-09 10:13 -0400
                Re: MISC - Stack Based vs. Register Based Brad Eckert <hwfwguy@gmail.com> - 2013-04-09 08:55 -0700
                Re: MISC - Stack Based vs. Register Based rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2013-04-09 14:40 -0400
                Re: MISC - Stack Based vs. Register Based rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2013-04-05 18:49 -0400
                Re: MISC - Stack Based vs. Register Based daveyrotten <danw8804@gmail.com> - 2013-04-09 13:02 -0700
                Re: MISC - Stack Based vs. Register Based rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2013-04-09 16:07 -0400
                Re: MISC - Stack Based vs. Register Based daveyrotten <danw8804@gmail.com> - 2013-04-09 13:26 -0700
                Re: MISC - Stack Based vs. Register Based rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2013-04-10 00:33 -0400
                Re: MISC - Stack Based vs. Register Based daveyrotten <danw8804@gmail.com> - 2013-04-10 07:08 -0700
                Re: MISC - Stack Based vs. Register Based rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2013-04-10 10:13 -0400
                Re: MISC - Stack Based vs. Register Based Sieur de Bienville <morrimichael@gmail.com> - 2013-04-10 21:08 -0700
                Re: MISC - Stack Based vs. Register Based Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-04-10 22:47 -0700
                Re: MISC - Stack Based vs. Register Based rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2013-04-11 16:32 -0400
                Re: MISC - Stack Based vs. Register Based "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailnotq.cpm> - 2013-04-18 06:23 -0400
                Re: MISC - Stack Based vs. Register Based rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2013-04-18 17:06 -0400
                Re: MISC - Stack Based vs. Register Based glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2013-04-05 17:33 +0000
                Re: MISC - Stack Based vs. Register Based rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2013-04-06 17:37 -0400
                Re: MISC - Stack Based vs. Register Based rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2013-04-05 18:08 -0400
                Re: MISC - Stack Based vs. Register Based rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2013-04-06 17:32 -0400
                Re: MISC - Stack Based vs. Register Based Brian Davis <brimdavis@aol.com> - 2013-04-07 14:59 -0700
                Re: MISC - Stack Based vs. Register Based rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2013-04-08 01:16 -0400
                Re: MISC - Stack Based vs. Register Based albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2013-04-08 09:52 +0000
            Re: MISC - Stack Based vs. Register Based rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2013-04-03 22:42 -0400
            Re: MISC - Stack Based vs. Register Based Alex McDonald <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2013-04-04 16:07 -0700
              Re: MISC - Stack Based vs. Register Based glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2013-04-05 04:10 +0000
                Re: MISC - Stack Based vs. Register Based Alex McDonald <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2013-04-04 23:49 -0700
    Re: MISC - Stack Based vs. Register Based rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2013-04-02 12:04 -0400
      Re: MISC - Stack Based vs. Register Based "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailnotq.cpm> - 2013-04-03 20:35 -0400
        Re: MISC - Stack Based vs. Register Based rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2013-04-04 00:09 -0400
  Re: MISC - Stack Based vs. Register Based the_gavino_himself <visphatesjava@gmail.com> - 2013-04-02 11:17 -0700
  Re: MISC - Stack Based vs. Register Based Syd Rumpo <usenet@nononono.co.uk> - 2013-04-04 09:38 +0100
    Re: MISC - Stack Based vs. Register Based Arlet Ottens <usenet+5@c-scape.nl> - 2013-04-04 11:31 +0200
      Re: MISC - Stack Based vs. Register Based "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-04-04 08:36 -1000
        Re: MISC - Stack Based vs. Register Based Brad Eckert <hwfwguy@gmail.com> - 2013-04-05 10:21 -0700
          Re: MISC - Stack Based vs. Register Based "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-04-05 07:53 -1000
    Re: MISC - Stack Based vs. Register Based glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2013-04-04 12:49 +0000
      Re: MISC - Stack Based vs. Register Based Arlet Ottens <usenet+5@c-scape.nl> - 2013-04-04 15:02 +0200
    Re: MISC - Stack Based vs. Register Based rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2013-04-04 18:57 -0400
  Re: MISC - Stack Based vs. Register Based AKE <assadebrahim2000@gmail.com> - 2013-04-05 15:29 -0700
    Re: MISC - Stack Based vs. Register Based rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2013-04-05 19:32 -0400
      Re: MISC - Stack Based vs. Register Based anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2013-04-06 14:16 +0000
        Re: MISC - Stack Based vs. Register Based rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2013-04-06 15:50 -0400
          Re: MISC - Stack Based vs. Register Based mhx@iae.nl (Marcel Hendrix) - 2013-04-07 01:33 +0200
            Re: MISC - Stack Based vs. Register Based AKE <assadebrahim2000@gmail.com> - 2013-04-07 02:57 -0700
              Re: MISC - Stack Based vs. Register Based stephenXXX@mpeforth.com (Stephen Pelc) - 2013-04-07 11:02 +0000
              Re: MISC - Stack Based vs. Register Based anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2013-04-07 13:51 +0000
                Re: MISC - Stack Based vs. Register Based "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2013-04-07 09:16 -1000
            Re: MISC - Stack Based vs. Register Based anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2013-04-07 14:13 +0000
              Re: MISC - Stack Based vs. Register Based mhx@iae.nl (Marcel Hendrix) - 2013-04-07 17:14 +0200
                Re: MISC - Stack Based vs. Register Based anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2013-04-07 15:31 +0000
            Re: MISC - Stack Based vs. Register Based Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2013-04-08 18:53 +0200
          Re: MISC - Stack Based vs. Register Based anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2013-04-07 14:22 +0000
  Re: MISC - Stack Based vs. Register Based "WJ" <w_a_x_man@yahoo.com> - 2013-04-14 00:19 +0000
    Re: MISC - Stack Based vs. Register Based rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2013-04-14 09:44 -0400
    Re: MISC - Stack Based vs. Register Based Brad Eckert <hwfwguy@gmail.com> - 2013-04-15 09:39 -0700
      Re: MISC - Stack Based vs. Register Based Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2013-04-15 19:28 +0200

csiph-web