Re: Message-not-understood and stack effects

From	Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.forth
Subject	Re: Message-not-understood and stack effects
Date	2012-05-04 02:46 +0200
Organization	1&1 Internet AG
Message-ID	<jnv8t0$im4$1@online.de> (permalink)
References	(9 earlier) <2012May2.142342@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> <rZSdnez_Ta6UpzzSnZ2dnUVZ_jCdnZ2d@supernews.com> <4fa14d7a$0$295$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <jnucg7$t3p$1@online.de> <4fa2bb6c$0$283$14726298@news.sunsite.dk>

Show all headers | View raw

Doug Hoffman wrote:
> Yes.  But with single inheritance (SI) you had to carefully "plan
> ahead".  MI provides greater flexibility in that respect.

Though the has-a design pattern often provides a way around that.  Your 
text edit widget just can have a string object inside, and wrap it up as 
GUI widget, it does not necessarily have to *be* a string object itself.  
Composition usually is far more flexible than inheritance.

> MI is the general solution for objects.  SI is a special case of MI.
> With MI you can always do it either way as needed by the problem and
> perhaps depending on what pre-defined classes you already have.

Yes, MI is the general solution of messy code, slammed together without 
planning - a very common approach in the OOP world ;-).

-- 
Bernd Paysan
"If you want it done right, you have to do it yourself"
http://bernd-paysan.de/

Thread

Message-not-understood and stack effects anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2012-04-17 13:16 +0000
  Re: Message-not-understood and stack effects "A. K." <akk@nospam.org> - 2012-04-17 18:20 +0200
    Re: Message-not-understood and stack effects anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2012-04-17 16:37 +0000
      Re: Message-not-understood and stack effects vandys@vsta.org - 2012-04-17 17:43 +0000
      Re: Message-not-understood and stack effects Alex McDonald <blog@rivadpm.com> - 2012-04-17 10:40 -0700
  Re: Message-not-understood and stack effects Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2012-04-17 12:41 -0500
    Re: Message-not-understood and stack effects anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2012-04-18 09:48 +0000
      Re: Message-not-understood and stack effects Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2012-04-18 05:59 -0500
        Re: Message-not-understood and stack effects John Passaniti <john.passaniti@gmail.com> - 2012-04-18 08:52 -0700
        Re: Message-not-understood and stack effects anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2012-04-19 11:47 +0000
          Re: Message-not-understood and stack effects Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2012-04-19 07:50 -0500
            Re: Message-not-understood and stack effects John Passaniti <john.passaniti@gmail.com> - 2012-04-19 07:14 -0700
              Re: Message-not-understood and stack effects Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2012-04-19 09:31 -0500
            Re: Message-not-understood and stack effects Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2012-04-19 19:31 +0200
            Re: Message-not-understood and stack effects anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2012-04-20 10:17 +0000
              Re: Message-not-understood and stack effects John Passaniti <john.passaniti@gmail.com> - 2012-04-20 07:52 -0700
                Re: Message-not-understood and stack effects anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2012-04-20 15:26 +0000
                Re: Message-not-understood and stack effects John Passaniti <john.passaniti@gmail.com> - 2012-04-24 06:09 -0700
                Re: Message-not-understood and stack effects anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2012-04-24 16:52 +0000
                Re: Message-not-understood and stack effects John Passaniti <john.passaniti@gmail.com> - 2012-04-28 18:38 -0700
                Re: Message-not-understood and stack effects "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailnot.cmm> - 2012-04-29 00:19 -0400
                Re: Message-not-understood and stack effects John Passaniti <john.passaniti@gmail.com> - 2012-04-29 11:16 -0700
                Re: Message-not-understood and stack effects "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailnot.cmm> - 2012-04-29 21:55 -0400
                Re: Message-not-understood and stack effects John Passaniti <john.passaniti@gmail.com> - 2012-05-01 14:44 -0700
                Re: Message-not-understood and stack effects "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@notemailnot.cmm> - 2012-05-02 05:35 -0400
                Re: Message-not-understood and stack effects Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2012-05-02 06:29 -0500
                Re: Message-not-understood and stack effects anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2012-05-02 12:23 +0000
                Re: Message-not-understood and stack effects Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2012-05-02 08:43 -0500
                Re: Message-not-understood and stack effects Doug Hoffman <glidedog@gmail.com> - 2012-05-02 11:06 -0400
                Re: Message-not-understood and stack effects Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2012-05-03 18:41 +0200
                Re: Message-not-understood and stack effects Doug Hoffman <glidedog@gmail.com> - 2012-05-03 13:07 -0400
                Re: Message-not-understood and stack effects Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2012-05-04 02:46 +0200
                Re: Message-not-understood and stack effects Doug Hoffman <glidedog@gmail.com> - 2012-05-03 22:09 -0400
                Re: Message-not-understood and stack effects anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2012-05-03 09:14 +0000
                Re: Message-not-understood and stack effects Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2012-05-03 04:33 -0500
                Re: Message-not-understood and stack effects Mark Wills <markrobertwills@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-05-02 12:58 -0700
                Re: Message-not-understood and stack effects vandys@vsta.org - 2012-05-02 20:43 +0000
                Re: Message-not-understood and stack effects Mark Wills <markrobertwills@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-05-02 13:48 -0700
                Re: Message-not-understood and stack effects John Passaniti <john.passaniti@gmail.com> - 2012-05-03 10:42 -0700
                TypoForth (was: Message-not-understood and stack effects) anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2012-04-30 13:47 +0000
                Re: TypoForth (was: Message-not-understood and stack effects) BruceMcF <agila61@netscape.net> - 2012-04-30 08:38 -0700
                Re: TypoForth (was: Message-not-understood and stack effects) anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2012-04-30 16:23 +0000
                Re: TypoForth (was: Message-not-understood and stack effects) BruceMcF <agila61@netscape.net> - 2012-04-30 09:41 -0700
                Re: TypoForth (was: Message-not-understood and stack effects) John Passaniti <john.passaniti@gmail.com> - 2012-05-01 14:53 -0700
  Re: Message-not-understood and stack effects anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2012-04-21 12:34 +0000

csiph-web