Re: The most elegant Forth interpreter.

Newsgroups	comp.lang.forth
Date	2013-05-18 10:56 -0700
References	(8 earlier) <f5b9ffec-71bb-4ef9-ad67-9e18e9803fa8@googlegroups.com> <7xhai111wk.fsf@ruckus.brouhaha.com> <c2ddf12d-0459-49d9-b3e4-c4dec88e9f24@googlegroups.com> <7x4ne097ko.fsf@ruckus.brouhaha.com> <cqmdndLNpLy25ArMnZ2dnUVZ_uKdnZ2d@supernews.com>
Message-ID	<ea377538-9443-4ff2-947a-7aba5834d05d@googlegroups.com> (permalink)
Subject	Re: The most elegant Forth interpreter.
From	visualforth@rocketmail.com

Show all headers | View raw

On Saturday, May 18, 2013 8:50:51 AM UTC-4, Andrew Haley wrote:
> I was using an 8051 with 4kbytes of ROM (and 128 bytes of RAM).  The
> bytecode threading meant that the production run would fit into an
> 8051 rather than an 8052.  Quite a bit of logic will fit in 4k with
> this technique.

This sounds amazing. That's just what I am looking for!
Is this public domain or proprietary?

Do you still have the source code?

May be I am able to analyze your source code - would you allow to use it for educational purposes?

Best Regards,
Dirk.

Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: The most elegant Forth interpreter. dirk.bruehl@usa.net - 2013-05-16 18:24 -0700
  Re: The most elegant Forth interpreter. Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-05-17 19:02 -0700
    Re: The most elegant Forth interpreter. visualforth@rocketmail.com - 2013-05-17 21:33 -0700
      Re: The most elegant Forth interpreter. Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-05-17 22:32 -0700
        Re: The most elegant Forth interpreter. Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-05-18 07:50 -0500
          Re: The most elegant Forth interpreter. visualforth@rocketmail.com - 2013-05-18 10:56 -0700
            Re: The most elegant Forth interpreter. Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-05-18 13:38 -0500
              Re: The most elegant Forth interpreter. visualforth@rocketmail.com - 2013-05-18 12:49 -0700
                Re: The most elegant Forth interpreter. Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-05-19 04:12 -0500
                Re: The most elegant Forth interpreter. visualforth@rocketmail.com - 2013-05-19 13:58 -0700
                Re: The most elegant Forth interpreter. Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-05-20 04:01 -0500
        Re: The most elegant Forth interpreter. visualforth@rocketmail.com - 2013-05-18 10:47 -0700
          Re: The most elegant Forth interpreter. Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2013-05-19 01:23 +0200
        Re: The most elegant Forth interpreter. visualforth@rocketmail.com - 2013-05-18 18:44 -0700
          Re: The most elegant Forth interpreter. Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2013-05-19 20:41 -0700
            Re: The most elegant Forth interpreter. visualforth@rocketmail.com - 2013-05-19 23:25 -0700
      Re: The most elegant Forth interpreter. "Bill Leary" <Bill_Leary@msn.com> - 2013-05-18 06:15 -0400
        Re: The most elegant Forth interpreter. visualforth@rocketmail.com - 2013-05-18 10:34 -0700
  Re: The most elegant Forth interpreter. Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2013-05-18 05:30 -0500

csiph-web