Re: Future of C

Path	csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From	Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.c
Subject	Re: Future of C
Date	Tue, 27 Mar 2018 08:52:58 -0700
Organization	None to speak of
Lines	16
Message-ID	<ln7epxwm5h.fsf@kst-u.example.com> (permalink)
References	<0231327b-9e28-46e4-9178-46c881a8dd91@googlegroups.com> <p7rm8f$1oj3$1@gioia.aioe.org> <20180310180016.eda9bc36e1a3b182bc2563a8@gmail.com> <p81ie9$1pc8$1@gioia.aioe.org> <20180311000302.8e7cd15242a818ab75eb2e98@gmail.com> <83527acf-abed-4f8f-878c-7d4db9cd5ac1@googlegroups.com> <c7g9add2d3mgc6ksk4c4f4500ivubjuog9@4ax.com> <20180311161525.ac591de531b83d6b14b2cd43@gmail.com> <90236828-48d7-4ee5-9b86-4cedd0e29b5f@googlegroups.com> <hwhpC.902622$F74.120435@fx47.am4> <d9d91c28-fb38-400b-8b92-ce7ce7d2b9cd@googlegroups.com> <3r7jne-t3h.ln1@gangtai.grep.be> <8e201938-ada4-42d9-8ae6-13b1047306e2@googlegroups.com> <lnina0c1xg.fsf@kst-u.example.com> <JrEpC.185321$mN7.7780@fx16.am4> <69a08d82-b76a-4334-be63-20dc22f869bf@googlegroups.com> <lna7vcbw69.fsf@kst-u.example.com> <0dcf08ee-d589-444c-8122-5310d95e80df@googlegroups.com> <p88srs$17c$1@dont-email.me> <kfna7uunp2c.fsf@x-alumni2.alumni.caltech.edu>
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Injection-Info	h2725194.stratoserver.net; posting-host="f50d935de97fb5682911313d09d819dd"; logging-data="24940"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19mHSAr5TAMF24HbB//Zydc"
User-Agent	Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock	sha1:jEXH6DWYCr0yjPPfi3Z96j+sCA0= sha1:eArh4+HMvwrMxc/JAGdJdLQ05Zg=
Xref	csiph.com comp.lang.c:128448

Show key headers only | View raw

Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> writes:
> David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> writes:
>
>> Overruning the stack is undefined behaviour - [...]
>
> Considered in the sense the ISO C standard defines and uses the
> term, overrunning a run-time stack is not undefined behavior.

Would you care to elaborate on that?  How is it not "behavior that
is not defined" (N1570 4p2)?

-- 
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) kst-u@mib.org  <http://www.ghoti.net/~kst>
Working, but not speaking, for JetHead Development, Inc.
"We must do something.  This is something.  Therefore, we must do this."
    -- Antony Jay and Jonathan Lynn, "Yes Minister"

Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: Future of C Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2018-03-26 21:02 -0700
  Re: Future of C David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2018-03-27 09:39 +0200
    Re: Future of C supercat@casperkitty.com - 2018-03-27 07:37 -0700
      Re: Future of C Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-03-28 11:19 -0700
  Re: Future of C Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-03-27 00:42 -0700
  Re: Future of C Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2018-03-27 08:52 -0700
    Re: Future of C Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2018-03-30 07:14 -0700
      Re: Future of C David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2018-03-30 17:23 +0200
        Re: Future of C Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-03-31 02:41 -0700
      Re: Future of C Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2018-03-30 09:45 -0700
        Re: Future of C Malcolm McLean <malcolm.arthur.mclean@gmail.com> - 2018-04-02 01:42 -0700
          Re: Future of C Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-02 04:53 -0700
          Re: Future of C supercat@casperkitty.com - 2018-04-02 06:02 -0700
            Re: Future of C Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-02 06:57 -0700
            Re: Future of C Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2018-04-02 09:12 -0700
              Re: Future of C "Chris M. Thomasson" <invalid_chris_thomasson@invalid.invalid> - 2018-04-02 13:30 -0700
                Re: Future of C Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-03 00:59 -0700
              Re: Future of C David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2018-04-02 22:33 +0200
                Re: Future of C Malcolm McLean <malcolm.arthur.mclean@gmail.com> - 2018-04-03 01:40 -0700
                Re: Future of C David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2018-04-03 12:47 +0200
              Re: Future of C supercat@casperkitty.com - 2018-04-03 09:51 -0700
                Re: Future of C Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2018-04-03 11:23 -0700
                Re: Future of C supercat@casperkitty.com - 2018-04-03 11:37 -0700
                Re: Future of C Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2018-04-03 11:46 -0700
                Re: Future of C supercat@casperkitty.com - 2018-04-03 12:26 -0700
                Re: Future of C Malcolm McLean <malcolm.arthur.mclean@gmail.com> - 2018-04-04 01:17 -0700
                Re: Future of C supercat@casperkitty.com - 2018-04-04 09:45 -0700
          Re: Future of C Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2018-04-02 09:10 -0700
            Re: Future of C Steven Petruzzellis <frelwizzen@gmail.com> - 2018-04-02 09:33 -0700
            Re: Future of C Malcolm McLean <malcolm.arthur.mclean@gmail.com> - 2018-04-03 01:35 -0700
              Re: Future of C David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2018-04-03 12:50 +0200
                Re: Future of C Malcolm McLean <malcolm.arthur.mclean@gmail.com> - 2018-04-03 04:01 -0700
              Re: Future of C Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2018-04-03 09:12 -0700
        Re: Future of C Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2018-04-04 16:17 -0700
          Re: Future of C Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2018-04-04 17:26 -0700
          Re: Future of C supercat@casperkitty.com - 2018-04-05 11:00 -0700

csiph-web