Re: Looking for C's equivalent of Pascal's "with"

Path	csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.fsmpi.rwth-aachen.de!news-1.dfn.de!news.dfn.de!news.informatik.hu-berlin.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From	Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.c
Subject	Re: Looking for C's equivalent of Pascal's "with"
Date	Fri, 04 Oct 2013 08:12:41 +1300
Lines	8
Message-ID	<bb5tt9FfnspU5@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References	<12de4151-32fd-4cb9-bb8a-affd0079db8d@googlegroups.com> <6f50bf15-bdba-4f24-8373-77c8cdebd15f@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding	7bit
X-Trace	individual.net YEVjRIb1Pt7D9MAICWy0TgU5p+H5wUuYK/C2fuXLrZjMBcXLGY
Cancel-Lock	sha1:hXDePjEr9LUvRe3CSVax7y/vGdw=
User-Agent	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; SunOS i86pc; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0
In-Reply-To	<6f50bf15-bdba-4f24-8373-77c8cdebd15f@googlegroups.com>
Xref	csiph.com comp.lang.c:36964

Show key headers only | View raw

christian.bau@cbau.wanadoo.co.uk wrote:
> The Pascal "WITH" statement is one of those things that seemed a good
> idea at the time, but produces highly unreadable code.

A good analogy for posting via that awful google Usenet interface!

-- 
Ian Collins

Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Looking for C's equivalent of Pascal's "with" Ruud Baltissen <rbaltissen@gmail.com> - 2013-10-02 06:35 -0700
  Re: Looking for C's equivalent of Pascal's "with" Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2013-10-02 10:06 -0400
    Re: Looking for C's equivalent of Pascal's "with" Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2013-10-03 13:40 +0000
    Re: Looking for C's equivalent of Pascal's "with" ralph <nt_consulting@yahoo.com> - 2013-10-03 12:42 -0500
  Re: Looking for C's equivalent of Pascal's "with" "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2013-10-02 15:39 +0100
    Re: Looking for C's equivalent of Pascal's "with" Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2013-10-02 16:40 +0100
      Re: Looking for C's equivalent of Pascal's "with" "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2013-10-02 17:20 +0100
  Re: Looking for C's equivalent of Pascal's "with" Nobody <nobody@nowhere.com> - 2013-10-02 15:40 +0100
  Re: Looking for C's equivalent of Pascal's "with" christian.bau@cbau.wanadoo.co.uk - 2013-10-03 11:03 -0700
    Re: Looking for C's equivalent of Pascal's "with" Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2013-10-04 08:12 +1300
    Re: Looking for C's equivalent of Pascal's "with" glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2013-10-03 19:21 +0000
      Re: Looking for C's equivalent of Pascal's "with" Fred K <fred.l.kleinschmidt@gmail.com> - 2013-10-04 11:48 -0700
        Re: Looking for C's equivalent of Pascal's "with" ralph <nt_consulting@yahoo.com> - 2013-10-04 20:01 -0500
          Re: Looking for C's equivalent of Pascal's "with" Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2013-10-04 18:43 -0700
            Re: Looking for C's equivalent of Pascal's "with" Lew Pitcher <lew.pitcher@digitalfreehold.ca> - 2013-10-04 21:53 -0400
  Re: Looking for C's equivalent of Pascal's "with" "Sc0rpi0" <sc[zero]rpi[zero]@scosys[dot]eu.org> - 2013-10-11 15:47 +0200
    Re: Looking for C's equivalent of Pascal's "with" Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2013-10-11 15:08 +0100

csiph-web