Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | Nobody <nobody@nowhere.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: Looking for C's equivalent of Pascal's "with" |
| Date | 2013-10-02 15:40 +0100 |
| Message-Id | <pan.2013.10.02.14.40.26.774000@nowhere.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| References | <12de4151-32fd-4cb9-bb8a-affd0079db8d@googlegroups.com> |
| Organization | Zen Internet |
On Wed, 02 Oct 2013 06:35:33 -0700, Ruud Baltissen wrote: > I'm looking for a C equivalent of this "with" construction. All > programming examples I saw so far always showed the complete structure. Is > there an equivalent or not? No. However, given a structure, you can obtain a pointer to any field within that structure, then access fields via that pointer. So when dealing with nested structures, it's not uncommon to take a pointer to some sub-structure and assign it to a variable. You can't make fields appear as variables, but you can collapse the top-level variable name and any number of intervening levels into a single variable.
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Looking for C's equivalent of Pascal's "with" Ruud Baltissen <rbaltissen@gmail.com> - 2013-10-02 06:35 -0700
Re: Looking for C's equivalent of Pascal's "with" Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2013-10-02 10:06 -0400
Re: Looking for C's equivalent of Pascal's "with" Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2013-10-03 13:40 +0000
Re: Looking for C's equivalent of Pascal's "with" ralph <nt_consulting@yahoo.com> - 2013-10-03 12:42 -0500
Re: Looking for C's equivalent of Pascal's "with" "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2013-10-02 15:39 +0100
Re: Looking for C's equivalent of Pascal's "with" Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2013-10-02 16:40 +0100
Re: Looking for C's equivalent of Pascal's "with" "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2013-10-02 17:20 +0100
Re: Looking for C's equivalent of Pascal's "with" Nobody <nobody@nowhere.com> - 2013-10-02 15:40 +0100
Re: Looking for C's equivalent of Pascal's "with" christian.bau@cbau.wanadoo.co.uk - 2013-10-03 11:03 -0700
Re: Looking for C's equivalent of Pascal's "with" Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2013-10-04 08:12 +1300
Re: Looking for C's equivalent of Pascal's "with" glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2013-10-03 19:21 +0000
Re: Looking for C's equivalent of Pascal's "with" Fred K <fred.l.kleinschmidt@gmail.com> - 2013-10-04 11:48 -0700
Re: Looking for C's equivalent of Pascal's "with" ralph <nt_consulting@yahoo.com> - 2013-10-04 20:01 -0500
Re: Looking for C's equivalent of Pascal's "with" Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2013-10-04 18:43 -0700
Re: Looking for C's equivalent of Pascal's "with" Lew Pitcher <lew.pitcher@digitalfreehold.ca> - 2013-10-04 21:53 -0400
Re: Looking for C's equivalent of Pascal's "with" "Sc0rpi0" <sc[zero]rpi[zero]@scosys[dot]eu.org> - 2013-10-11 15:47 +0200
Re: Looking for C's equivalent of Pascal's "with" Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2013-10-11 15:08 +0100
csiph-web