Re: bart again (UCX64)

From	Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.c
Subject	Re: bart again (UCX64)
Date	2024-01-25 07:16 -0800
Organization	None to speak of
Message-ID	<87y1cd4f5s.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> (permalink)
References	(16 earlier) <86zfwvejxi.fsf@linuxsc.com> <87r0i78uu2.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <uoqlbc$1og8m$1@dont-email.me> <uorfhp$1sonl$1@dont-email.me> <uot5b9$27t7l$1@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw

David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> writes:
> On 24/01/2024 17:57, James Kuyper wrote:
>> On 1/24/24 04:30, David Brown wrote:
>>> On 24/01/2024 00:59, Keith Thompson wrote:
>>>> Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> writes:
>>>
>>> For the record, Keith's summary here is completely correct as far as I
>>> remember this thread. Tim's does not match what he or others wrote. I
>>> do not recall ever seeing any kind of "withdrawal". It's clearly
>>> possible that I missed said withdrawal, or that I have forgotten it,
>>> but if there has been such a withdrawal it must have been so subtle
>>> that no one else in the thread saw it. I'm sure that anyone else would
>>> have brought it to Keith's attention long ago. (I certainly would have.)
>>>
>>> And if Tim had been interested in communicating clearly, he could have
>>> repeated the withdrawal and given a reference to the first posting of
>>> it, instead of floundering with attempted definitions of the word
>>> "answer".
>> On 2023-09-04 18:42:14 Keith said:
>>> It does have undefined behavior, ... but it does not
>>> violate any syntax rule or constraint.
>> On 2023-09-04 21:16:01 Tim responded:
>>> I say it does.
>> On 2023-09-04 21:57:44 Keith responded:
>>> What syntax rule or constraint does it violate?
>> A long discussion occurred, during which Tim repeatedly failed to
>> identify a syntax rule or constraint violated by that code.
>> On 2023-10-26 11:56:12, Tim wrote:
>>> I realized at some point that my earlier statement was not
>>> understood the way I meant it. Rather than try to go back and
>>> unwind the miscommunication, I decided to just drop it. I
>>> withdraw my earlier statement. Okay?
>> Now, I cannot imagine (and as normal, Tim has refused to explain)
>> what
>> meaning he intended by saying "I say it does." that would make "it does"
>> correct. But he did in fact withdraw that comment.
>
> Do you remember a reference or a date for that withdrawal message?

Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2023 08:55:51 -0700
Message-ID: <867cn92xa0.fsf@linuxsc.com>
<https://groups.google.com/g/comp.lang.c/c/O-V_X7Cfc6I/m/j1oHoyo5AgAJ>
[...]

-- 
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com
Working, but not speaking, for Medtronic
void Void(void) { Void(); } /* The recursive call of the void */

Thread

Re: bart again (UCX64) Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2023-12-25 17:45 -0800
  Re: bart again (UCX64) Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2023-12-25 21:12 -0800
  Re: bart again (UCX64) James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2023-12-27 20:14 -0500
    Re: bart again (UCX64) Julieta Shem <jshem@yaxenu.org> - 2023-12-27 23:22 -0300
      Re: bart again (UCX64) Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2023-12-28 04:25 +0100
    Re: bart again (UCX64) Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2023-12-28 04:22 +0100
      Re: bart again (UCX64) Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-01-23 14:58 -0800
        Re: bart again (UCX64) Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2024-01-23 15:59 -0800
          Re: bart again (UCX64) David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2024-01-24 10:30 +0100
            Re: bart again (UCX64) James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2024-01-24 11:57 -0500
              Re: bart again (UCX64) Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2024-01-24 11:26 -0800
                Re: bart again (UCX64) Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-02-14 21:14 -0800
                Re: bart again (UCX64) Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2024-02-14 22:29 -0800
                Re: bart again (UCX64) Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-02-19 17:53 -0800
              Re: bart again (UCX64) David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2024-01-25 09:15 +0100
                Re: bart again (UCX64) Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2024-01-25 07:16 -0800
                Re: bart again (UCX64) David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2024-01-26 09:20 +0100
    Re: bart again (UCX64) David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2023-12-28 09:12 +0100
      Re: bart again (UCX64) Paul Edwards <mutazilah@gmail.com> - 2023-12-28 16:31 +0800
    Re: bart again (UCX64) Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-01-23 15:06 -0800

csiph-web