Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.c > #382503

Re: bart again (UCX64)

From Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.c
Subject Re: bart again (UCX64)
Date 2024-02-14 21:14 -0800
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <86o7ci1f8e.fsf@linuxsc.com> (permalink)
References (16 earlier) <86zfwvejxi.fsf@linuxsc.com> <87r0i78uu2.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <uoqlbc$1og8m$1@dont-email.me> <uorfhp$1sonl$1@dont-email.me> <8734um7ctd.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com>

Show all headers | View raw


Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> writes:

> [...]

I have now read through your comments several times, first somewhat
quickly and then more slowly and carefully.  (To be specific, the
comments referred to are those in the posting being replied to, and
also those three articles up from the immediately previous one, in
the same thread.)  Here is a short synopsis of my perceptions from
the prior discussions.

I posted a followup containing only a short one-sentence comment,
which precipitated a long series of postings and comments going
back and forth.

After realizing that my original one-sentence statement had been
misunderstood, I withdrew the earlier statement, meaning the
original one-sentence comment that precipitated it all.  I was
hoping to wrap up the discussion.  Following my statement of
withdrawal I have nothing more to say about that.

Early on a question was asked about my initial statement but I
realized the subject of the question was not the same as what I
was talking about.  Because the subject was different I didn't
have anything to say about it, and that is still the case now.

At some point it seemed like the discussion was finished, but
after a time a posting was made containing what I consider to be
an unfounded accusation.  I responded to try to set the record
straight.

At some later point I submitted a followup to a posting from
someone who had not participated in the discussions up to that
point.  I did this because I thought some misrepresentations
had been made, and so I made an effort to give a fair and
faithful presentation of what had happened.  That posting of
mine provoked another series of comments and reactions, which
appear to be similar to comments and reactions given earlier.

Based on recent comments it appears there was some confusion about
whether, or maybe when, I made the statement about withdrawing my
original comment.  I appreciate that the confusion was recognized
and a statement was made to that effect (note that "confusion" is
my word choice, not necessarily anyone else's).

(end of synopsis.)

I make no claim that any of the synopsis statements are offered
as statements of fact.

Let me say again that I have read through your comments and
expect to consider further what you have said.  As of now I have
nothing more to say about them.

Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: bart again (UCX64) Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2023-12-25 17:45 -0800
  Re: bart again (UCX64) Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2023-12-25 21:12 -0800
  Re: bart again (UCX64) James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2023-12-27 20:14 -0500
    Re: bart again (UCX64) Julieta Shem <jshem@yaxenu.org> - 2023-12-27 23:22 -0300
      Re: bart again (UCX64) Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2023-12-28 04:25 +0100
    Re: bart again (UCX64) Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2023-12-28 04:22 +0100
      Re: bart again (UCX64) Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-01-23 14:58 -0800
        Re: bart again (UCX64) Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2024-01-23 15:59 -0800
          Re: bart again (UCX64) David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2024-01-24 10:30 +0100
            Re: bart again (UCX64) James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2024-01-24 11:57 -0500
              Re: bart again (UCX64) Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2024-01-24 11:26 -0800
                Re: bart again (UCX64) Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-02-14 21:14 -0800
                Re: bart again (UCX64) Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2024-02-14 22:29 -0800
                Re: bart again (UCX64) Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-02-19 17:53 -0800
              Re: bart again (UCX64) David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2024-01-25 09:15 +0100
                Re: bart again (UCX64) Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2024-01-25 07:16 -0800
                Re: bart again (UCX64) David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2024-01-26 09:20 +0100
    Re: bart again (UCX64) David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2023-12-28 09:12 +0100
      Re: bart again (UCX64) Paul Edwards <mutazilah@gmail.com> - 2023-12-28 16:31 +0800
    Re: bart again (UCX64) Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2024-01-23 15:06 -0800

csiph-web