Re: Should comp.lang.c.moderated be revived?

Path	csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From	Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.c
Subject	Re: Should comp.lang.c.moderated be revived?
Date	Tue, 11 Mar 2025 23:24:16 -0700
Organization	None to speak of
Lines	14
Message-ID	<87ikoe9373.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> (permalink)
References	<87h640gvyr.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <86h63yub2r.fsf@linuxsc.com>
MIME-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain
Injection-Date	Wed, 12 Mar 2025 07:24:20 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info	dont-email.me; posting-host="2ee0643898249dbfd259d9c8db55be3c"; logging-data="2611053"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19Txz4T/v+ptnEbU4EvTN01"
User-Agent	Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
Cancel-Lock	sha1:+r3boiQyvyDGeHmz34kwEnvDa4Q= sha1:HE6SL63PeBSUo6rDqGKsEG6fwXI=
Xref	csiph.com comp.lang.c:391074

Show key headers only | View raw

Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> writes:
[...]
> I am in favor of reviving comp.lang.c.moderated, and hope a
> suitable moderating arrangement can be found.
>
> Technical question:  is it feasible to have moderating duties
> be shared among several people on some sort of rotating basis?
> I have no experience moderating a usenet news group.

I'm fairly sure it is.

-- 
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com
void Void(void) { Void(); } /* The recursive call of the void */

Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Should comp.lang.c.moderated be revived? Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2025-03-10 19:08 -0700
  Re: Should comp.lang.c.moderated be revived? Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2025-03-10 20:17 -0700
  Re: Should comp.lang.c.moderated be revived? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2025-03-11 09:00 +0100
    Re: Should comp.lang.c.moderated be revived? John McCue <jmccue@qball.jmcunx.com> - 2025-03-13 14:39 +0000
  Re: Should comp.lang.c.moderated be revived? Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2025-03-11 21:28 -0700
    Re: Should comp.lang.c.moderated be revived? Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2025-03-12 04:37 +0000
      Re: Should comp.lang.c.moderated be revived? Ben Bacarisse <ben@bsb.me.uk> - 2025-03-13 01:23 +0000
    Re: Should comp.lang.c.moderated be revived? Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2025-03-11 23:24 -0700
    Re: Should comp.lang.c.moderated be revived? cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2025-03-12 09:14 +0000
  Re: Should comp.lang.c.moderated be revived? Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2025-03-12 17:28 -0700

csiph-web