Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register


Groups > comp.lang.c > #391002

Re: Should comp.lang.c.moderated be revived?

From Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.c
Subject Re: Should comp.lang.c.moderated be revived?
Date 2025-03-10 20:17 -0700
Organization None to speak of
Message-ID <87cyeogss0.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> (permalink)
References <87h640gvyr.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com>

Show all headers | View raw


Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> writes:
> I just saw a post on news.announce.newgroups posted 2025-01-03, subject
> "1st RfD: Mass-deletion of moderated groups without a moderator".
>
> "This is a formal Request for Discussion (RFD) to remove the following
> 101 moderated newsgroups."
>
> comp.lang.c.moderated is on the list.
>
> Seebs was the moderator of comp.lang.c.moderated, but has
> not participated since 2014.  There have been no posts on
> comp.lang.c.moderated since then.
>
> There have been discussions here in comp.lang.c in 2018 and 2021
> about reviving comp.lang.c.moderated.  I emailed Seebs about this
> at the time, and he expressed tentative interesting in seeing it
> revived, but with someone else moderating it.
>
> My tentative opinion is that it's probably not worth reviving,
> but if others are sufficiently interested *and* someone volunteers
> to moderate it, perhaps it could be done.  If it were revived,
> I'd certainly subscribe and participate.
>
> One possible concern is that if comp.lang.c.moderated is removed,
> historical posts might be lost.  I don't know whether that's
> a valid concern.  It might depend on the policies of individual
> Usenet servers and archives.

Seebs replied to my email:
"""
I'd be happy to hand it off to someone but I'm pretty overwhelmed
right now and couldn't actually participate. But I still have the
account and could hand it off.

-s
"""

-- 
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com
void Void(void) { Void(); } /* The recursive call of the void */

Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

Should comp.lang.c.moderated be revived? Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2025-03-10 19:08 -0700
  Re: Should comp.lang.c.moderated be revived? Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2025-03-10 20:17 -0700
  Re: Should comp.lang.c.moderated be revived? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2025-03-11 09:00 +0100
    Re: Should comp.lang.c.moderated be revived? John McCue <jmccue@qball.jmcunx.com> - 2025-03-13 14:39 +0000
  Re: Should comp.lang.c.moderated be revived? Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2025-03-11 21:28 -0700
    Re: Should comp.lang.c.moderated be revived? Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2025-03-12 04:37 +0000
      Re: Should comp.lang.c.moderated be revived? Ben Bacarisse <ben@bsb.me.uk> - 2025-03-13 01:23 +0000
    Re: Should comp.lang.c.moderated be revived? Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2025-03-11 23:24 -0700
    Re: Should comp.lang.c.moderated be revived? cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2025-03-12 09:14 +0000
  Re: Should comp.lang.c.moderated be revived? Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2025-03-12 17:28 -0700

csiph-web