Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.c > #153654

Re: typedef ... refactored

Path csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.c
Subject Re: typedef ... refactored
Date Fri, 14 Aug 2020 13:23:01 -0700
Organization None to speak of
Lines 29
Message-ID <87bljdx9i2.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> (permalink)
References <7a5f16a3-d30d-46ec-9926-b0736428902do@googlegroups.com> <rgoo37$3ca$1@dont-email.me> <slrnrj3c08.u86.please@logancomp.rathbonelaw.com> <rgtcot$7i6$1@dont-email.me> <20200813005227.b02c40b51ddf5ad71c7ca82b@gmail.com> <rh5v58$349$1@dont-email.me> <SAvZG.2442895$fgO.1865466@fx12.am4> <rh61ij$h7d$1@dont-email.me> <rh683a$oi0$1@dont-email.me> <4yyZG.1646292$6_j.1423379@fx37.ams4> <rh6n9t$o62$1@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding 8bit
Injection-Info reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="9f3455e9a718163ce4105e79bc2a7323"; logging-data="15890"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+C5HtxYMajgELwK3mFrW2V"
User-Agent Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.3 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock sha1:GfG7EFNFfLYCtZZeQftqxmi/gAI= sha1:stq8y52wN/co7GLpKutG5sc1j4U=
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.c:153654

Show key headers only | View raw

David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> writes:
> On 14/08/2020 17:59, Bart wrote:
[...]
>> That begs the question of why they need their own namespace.
>
> (Nitpick - "begs the question" does not mean what you think it means.)
[...]

Nitpick - there is no longer a widely agreed meaning of that phrase.

The real problem IMHO is that "begs the question" is a lousy
translation of the Latin "petitio principii", which in turn was a
lousy translation of the original Greek "τὸ ἐξ ἀρχῆς".

The original meaning is "assumes the conclusion".  A common modern
meaning is "raises the question" (which makes more sense given the
English phrase).

I don't think we'll ever get everyone to agree on a meaning.
My personal solution is to avoid the phrase, and instead say
"assumes the conclusion" or "raises the question", depending on
which one I actually mean.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Begging_the_question

-- 
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com
Working, but not speaking, for Philips Healthcare
void Void(void) { Void(); } /* The recursive call of the void */

Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

typedef ... refactored G G <gdotone@gmail.com> - 2020-08-09 01:07 -0700
  Re: typedef ... refactored G G <gdotone@gmail.com> - 2020-08-09 01:46 -0700
    Re: typedef ... refactored Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2020-08-09 08:09 -0400
      Re: typedef ... refactored Manfred <noname@add.invalid> - 2020-08-09 18:08 +0200
  Re: typedef ... refactored Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2020-08-09 09:29 +0000
  Re: typedef ... refactored Johann Klammer <klammerj@NOSPAM.a1.net> - 2020-08-09 13:29 +0200
  Re: typedef ... refactored Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2020-08-09 13:53 +0200
    Re: typedef ... refactored Poprocks <please@replytogroup.com> - 2020-08-10 20:37 +0000
      Re: typedef ... refactored Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2020-08-10 13:49 -0700
        Re: typedef ... refactored Poprocks <please@replytogroup.com> - 2020-08-10 23:09 +0000
          Re: typedef ... refactored Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2020-08-11 07:14 +0000
            Why not indeed??? (Was: typedef ... refactored) gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2020-08-11 07:48 +0000
            Re: typedef ... refactored Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-11 10:56 +0100
        Re: typedef ... refactored Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2020-08-28 04:08 -0700
      Re: typedef ... refactored Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2020-08-11 08:10 +0200
        Re: typedef ... refactored Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@gmail.com> - 2020-08-13 00:52 +0300
          Re: typedef ... refactored Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2020-08-14 14:13 +0200
            Re: typedef ... refactored Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2020-08-14 13:37 +0100
              Re: typedef ... refactored Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2020-08-14 14:54 +0200
                Re: typedef ... refactored David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2020-08-14 16:46 +0200
                Re: typedef ... refactored Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2020-08-14 16:59 +0100
                Re: typedef ... refactored David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2020-08-14 21:05 +0200
                Re: typedef ... refactored Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2020-08-14 20:51 +0100
                Re: typedef ... refactored antispam@math.uni.wroc.pl - 2020-08-16 13:36 +0000
                Re: typedef ... refactored Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2020-08-16 15:58 +0100
                Re: typedef ... refactored antispam@math.uni.wroc.pl - 2020-08-16 18:10 +0000
                Re: typedef ... refactored Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2020-08-14 13:23 -0700
                Re: typedef ... refactored David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2020-08-16 19:48 +0200
                [OT] words.  Was: typedef ... refactored Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-16 20:08 +0100
                Re: [OT] words. Was: typedef ... refactored David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2020-08-17 10:50 +0200
                Re: [OT] words. Was: typedef ... refactored Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-17 12:00 +0100
                Re: typedef ... refactored Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@g{oogle}mail.com> - 2020-08-17 17:51 +0300
                Re: typedef ... refactored Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-17 16:06 +0100
                Re: typedef ... refactored Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2020-08-17 10:48 -0700
                Re: typedef ... refactored scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2020-08-17 19:36 +0000
                Re: typedef ... refactored Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2020-08-17 14:06 -0700
                Re: typedef ... refactored Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2020-08-28 03:53 -0700
                Re: typedef ... refactored Kaz Kylheku <793-849-0957@kylheku.com> - 2020-08-28 15:30 +0000
                Re: typedef ... refactored Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2020-08-29 02:24 +0100
                Re: typedef ... refactored Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2020-08-14 18:37 +0200
                Re: typedef ... refactored Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2020-08-14 10:29 -0700
                Re: typedef ... refactored David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2020-08-14 21:10 +0200
                Re: typedef ... refactored Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2020-08-14 12:32 -0700
  Re: typedef ... refactored G G <gdotone@gmail.com> - 2020-08-09 05:44 -0700
    Re: typedef ... refactored Barry Schwarz <schwarzb@delq.com> - 2020-08-09 08:12 -0700
      Re: typedef ... refactored G G <gdotone@gmail.com> - 2020-08-09 08:32 -0700
  Re: typedef ... refactored John Bode <jfbode1029@gmail.com> - 2020-08-12 11:45 -0700
    Re: typedef ... refactored Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2020-08-12 19:59 +0100
    Re: typedef ... refactored Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2020-08-12 14:16 -0700
    Re: typedef ... refactored Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2020-08-28 05:05 -0700
  Re: typedef ... refactored Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@gmail.com> - 2020-08-13 00:41 +0300

csiph-web