Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.c > #158645

Re: CMPLX vs a+bi values

Path csiph.com!eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.c
Subject Re: CMPLX vs a+bi values
Date Wed, 27 Jan 2021 06:19:06 -0800
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Lines 15
Message-ID <86sg6mlaxx.fsf@linuxsc.com> (permalink)
References <rtu0vv$h9q$1@dont-email.me> <86h7nbocsh.fsf@linuxsc.com> <runtsh$e72$1@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Injection-Info reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="a3a7a3546220eb2a4a7cfe4d4683198c"; logging-data="10707"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18tCJY5+TtU38mThcz9MxLlBg3Ms8hQMuM="
User-Agent Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.4 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock sha1:guQ80GBca4FWN/o/zCROfVd/ulg= sha1:yEM3rbWUca9fOMg61J6mjyPdI0k=
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.c:158645

Show key headers only | View raw

beej@beej.us (Beej) writes:

> Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> wrote:
>
>> I have some comments on this question.  First though I am
>> curious to know if you read my response to your question
>> about floodfill.
>
> I did;  I just didn't have anything additional to add.

I wasn't sure what your reactions were or even if you had
read it at all.  I went to some amount of effort to put a
response together, so normally I would expect to see at
least an acknowledgement, and a bit more if any of the
response was new to you.  Just to say that directly.

Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

CMPLX vs a+bi values beej@beej.us (Beej) - 2021-01-16 06:27 +0000
  Re: CMPLX vs a+bi values James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2021-01-16 11:18 -0500
    Re: CMPLX vs a+bi values "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2021-01-20 13:52 -0800
      Re: CMPLX vs a+bi values "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2021-01-20 14:01 -0800
  Re: CMPLX vs a+bi values Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2021-01-20 07:20 -0800
    Re: CMPLX vs a+bi values beej@beej.us (Beej) - 2021-01-26 02:13 +0000
      Re: CMPLX vs a+bi values Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2021-01-27 06:19 -0800
  Re: CMPLX vs a+bi values "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2021-01-20 13:39 -0800
    Re: CMPLX vs a+bi values "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2021-01-20 13:40 -0800
    Re: CMPLX vs a+bi values James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2021-01-20 17:40 -0500
      Re: CMPLX vs a+bi values "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2021-01-20 14:57 -0800
        Re: CMPLX vs a+bi values James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2021-01-20 19:21 -0500
          Re: CMPLX vs a+bi values "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2021-01-20 19:44 -0800
  Re: CMPLX vs a+bi values Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2021-01-27 07:30 -0800

csiph-web