Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: CMPLX vs a+bi values
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2021 06:19:06 -0800
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 15
Message-ID: <86sg6mlaxx.fsf@linuxsc.com>
References: <rtu0vv$h9q$1@dont-email.me> <86h7nbocsh.fsf@linuxsc.com> <runtsh$e72$1@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="a3a7a3546220eb2a4a7cfe4d4683198c"; logging-data="10707"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18tCJY5+TtU38mThcz9MxLlBg3Ms8hQMuM="
User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.4 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:guQ80GBca4FWN/o/zCROfVd/ulg= sha1:yEM3rbWUca9fOMg61J6mjyPdI0k=
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.c:158645

beej@beej.us (Beej) writes:

> Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> wrote:
>
>> I have some comments on this question.  First though I am
>> curious to know if you read my response to your question
>> about floodfill.
>
> I did;  I just didn't have anything additional to add.

I wasn't sure what your reactions were or even if you had
read it at all.  I went to some amount of effort to put a
response together, so normally I would expect to see at
least an acknowledgement, and a bit more if any of the
response was new to you.  Just to say that directly.