Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.c++.moderated

comp.lang.c++.moderated

6889 articles, 1185 threads (numbers 560 – 7448) — flat view

| Advanced

Subject Author Date
doctest - the lightest feature rich C++ single header testing framework - version 1.0 released! vik.kirilov@googlemail.com 2016-05-22 18:49 -0600
 
Non-recursive tuple implementation Sergey Strukov <sshimnick@this.is.invalid> 2016-05-19 14:49 -0600
 
How to programmatically change the ubuntu 16.04 System Monitor process name from cli or mono to an unique name? (1 reply) allswellthatendswell <FrankChang91@googlemail.com> 2016-05-18 06:27 -0600
   → Re: How to programmatically change the ubuntu 16.04 System Monitor process name from cli or mono to an unique name? red floyd <no.spam@its.invalid> 2016-05-18 15:51 -0600
 
uniform initialization of temporary reference MJanes <max.jns@googlemail.com> 2016-05-17 06:29 -0600
 
Templated Overloaded Operator (4 replies) Adi Shavit <adishavit@googlemail.com> 2016-04-27 13:08 -0600
   → Re: Templated Overloaded Operator Adi Shavit <adishavit@googlemail.com> 2016-04-27 17:12 -0600
     → Re: Templated Overloaded Operator Adi Shavit <adishavit@googlemail.com> 2016-04-28 06:30 -0600
       → Re: Templated Overloaded Operator Adi Shavit <adishavit@googlemail.com> 2016-04-28 15:01 -0600
   → Re: Templated Overloaded Operator Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> 2016-05-08 17:10 -0600
 
Lamda as Operator Overload (6 replies) Adi Shavit <adishavit@googlemail.com> 2016-04-27 06:46 -0600
   → Re: Lamda as Operator Overload Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> 2016-04-27 08:44 -0600
     → Re: Lamda as Operator Overload Kalle Olavi Niemitalo <kon@iki.fi> 2016-04-27 15:21 -0600
       → Re: Lamda as Operator Overload Adi Shavit <adishavit@googlemail.com> 2016-04-27 17:13 -0600
         → Re: Lamda as Operator Overload Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> 2016-04-28 06:30 -0600
   → Re: Lamda as Operator Overload Martin Bonner <martinfrompi@yahoo.co.uk> 2016-04-27 08:44 -0600
     → Re: Lamda as Operator Overload Adi Shavit <adishavit@googlemail.com> 2016-04-27 15:14 -0600
 
c++ language spec feature request (7 replies) Jim Michaels <jmichae3@this.is.invalid> 2016-04-23 07:01 -0600
   → Re: c++ language spec feature request Martin Bonner <martinfrompi@yahoo.co.uk> 2016-04-24 07:17 -0600
     → Re: c++ language spec feature request Cholo Lennon <chololennon@this.is.invalid> 2016-04-25 13:01 -0600
       → Re: c++ language spec feature request Martin Bonner <martinfrompi@yahoo.co.uk> 2016-04-26 09:20 -0600
         → Re: c++ language spec feature request Cholo Lennon <chololennon@this.is.invalid> 2016-04-27 06:45 -0600
   → Re: c++ language spec feature request Wouter van Ooijen <wouter@voti.nl> 2016-04-24 12:05 -0600
   → Re: c++ language spec feature request legalize+jeeves@mail.xmission.com (Richard) 2016-04-26 13:32 -0600
     → Re: c++ language spec feature request Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> 2016-04-27 08:43 -0600
 
Global lambdas and ODR (4 replies) raskolnikov <magnicida@googlemail.com> 2016-04-07 19:56 -0600
   → Re: Global lambdas and ODR pfultz2 <pfultz2@this.is.invalid> 2016-04-11 19:30 -0600
     → Re: Global lambdas and ODR Juan Pedro Bolivar Puente <raskolnikov@gnu.org> 2016-04-12 06:49 -0600
     → Re: Global lambdas and ODR Juan Pedro Bolivar Puente <raskolnikov@gnu.org> 2016-04-12 06:49 -0600
       → Re: Global lambdas and ODR pfultz2 <pfultz2@this.is.invalid> 2016-04-12 12:53 -0600
 
Manipulating std::match_results? (2 replies) Hergen Lehmann <hlehmann.expires.5-11@snafu.de> 2016-04-04 17:44 -0600
   → Re: Manipulating std::match_results? Martin Bonner <martinfrompi@yahoo.co.uk> 2016-04-05 08:19 -0600
   → Re: Manipulating std::match_results? guy.tristram@googlemail.com 2016-04-05 08:19 -0600
 
A failure to handle exceptions (2 replies) James Moe <jimoeDESPAM@sohnen-moe.com> 2016-03-27 07:29 -0600
   → Re: A failure to handle exceptions Martin Bonner <martinfrompi@yahoo.co.uk> 2016-03-29 07:02 -0600
   → Re: A failure to handle exceptions Ralf Fassel <ralfixx@gmx.de> 2016-03-29 13:38 -0600
 
a particular "explicit specialization" case (1 reply) phpete48@googlemail.com 2016-03-20 16:06 -0600
   → Re: a particular "explicit specialization" case Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> 2016-03-21 07:27 -0600
 
C++ exceptions are broken. (10 replies) Mr Flibble <flibbleREMOVETHISBIT@i42.co.uk> 2016-03-08 06:31 -0600
   → Re: C++ exceptions are broken. "James K. Lowden" <jklowden@speakeasy.net> 2016-03-09 08:25 -0600
     → Re: C++ exceptions are broken. Elias Salomão Helou Neto <eshneto@googlemail.com> 2016-03-12 06:28 -0600
     → Re: C++ exceptions are broken. Mr Flibble <flibbleREMOVETHISBIT@i42.co.uk> 2016-03-12 14:46 -0600
       → Re: C++ exceptions are broken. Hergen Lehmann <hlehmann.expires.5-11@snafu.de> 2016-03-12 16:50 -0600
       → Re: C++ exceptions are broken. "James K. Lowden" <jklowden@speakeasy.net> 2016-03-13 15:55 -0600
         → Re: C++ exceptions are broken. Gareth Owen <gwowen@googlemail.com> 2016-03-15 08:45 -0600
           → Re: C++ exceptions are broken. Bo Persson <bop@gmb.dk> 2016-03-15 12:22 -0600
             → Re: C++ exceptions are broken. "Alf P. Steinbach" <alf.p.steinbach+usenet@googlemail.com> 2016-03-17 06:43 -0600
             → Re: C++ exceptions are broken. Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> 2016-03-17 06:43 -0600
       → Re: C++ exceptions are broken. Gareth Owen <gwowen@googlemail.com> 2016-03-15 08:44 -0600
 
utf-8 string literal (2 replies) Sascha Schwarz <s4as5z@googlemail.com> 2016-03-14 06:49 -0600
   → Re: utf-8 string literal Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> 2016-03-14 17:10 -0600
     → Re: utf-8 string literal Sascha Schwarz <s4as5z@googlemail.com> 2016-03-15 08:45 -0600
 
Covariance and xxx_ptr (1 reply) Javier <iphone.javier.estrada@googlemail.com> 2016-03-05 07:00 -0600
   → Re: Covariance and xxx_ptr Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> 2016-03-07 12:11 -0600
 
Isn't it better using Qt than the 'standerd' C++? (17 replies) wij@totalbb.net.tw 2016-02-25 08:26 -0600
   → Re: Isn't it better using Qt than the 'standerd' C++? Martin Bonner <martinfrompi@yahoo.co.uk> 2016-02-25 09:20 -0600
   → Re: Isn't it better using Qt than the 'standerd' C++? Wouter van Ooijen <wouter@voti.nl> 2016-02-25 09:46 -0600
   → Re: Isn't it better using Qt than the 'standerd' C++? Francis Glassborow <francis.glassborow@btinternet.com> 2016-02-26 06:47 -0600
     → Re: Isn't it better using Qt than the 'standerd' C++? wij <wij@totalbb.net.tw> 2016-03-02 06:34 -0600
       → Re: Isn't it better using Qt than the 'standerd' C++? Martin Bonner <martinfrompi@yahoo.co.uk> 2016-03-02 11:07 -0600
         → Re: Isn't it better using Qt than the 'standerd' C++? wij@totalbb.net.tw 2016-03-03 06:27 -0600
           → Re: Isn't it better using Qt than the 'standerd' C++? Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> 2016-03-04 06:44 -0600
             → Re: Isn't it better using Qt than the 'standerd' C++? wij@totalbb.net.tw 2016-03-05 06:58 -0600
       → Re: Isn't it better using Qt than the 'standerd' C++? Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> 2016-03-03 06:27 -0600
         → Re: Isn't it better using Qt than the 'standerd' C++? legalize+jeeves@mail.xmission.com (Richard) 2016-03-04 11:01 -0600
           → Re: Isn't it better using Qt than the 'standerd' C++? Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> 2016-03-05 06:57 -0600
   → Re: Isn't it better using Qt than the 'standerd' C++? wij@totalbb.net.tw 2016-02-26 06:47 -0600
     → Re: Isn't it better using Qt than the 'standerd' C++? Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> 2016-02-26 09:31 -0600
       → Re: Isn't it better using Qt than the 'standerd' C++? "James K. Lowden" <jklowden@speakeasy.net> 2016-02-26 15:46 -0600
         → Re: Isn't it better using Qt than the 'standerd' C++? legalize+jeeves@mail.xmission.com (Richard) 2016-02-26 19:29 -0600
         → Re: Isn't it better using Qt than the 'standerd' C++? Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> 2016-02-27 07:16 -0600
   → Re: Isn't it better using Qt than the 'standerd' C++? Cholo Lennon <chololennon@this.is.invalid> 2016-02-26 09:30 -0600
 
cv-qualified function type and type deduction (1 reply) wander <wandersys@googlemail.com> 2016-02-20 07:15 -0600
   → Re: cv-qualified function type and type deduction Daniel Krügler <daniel.kruegler@googlemail.com> 2016-02-22 19:49 -0600
 
Initialization of data members inside a class (2 replies) Joe Bentley <joe.foxhound@googlemail.com> 2016-02-21 13:20 -0600
   → Re: Initialization of data members inside a class Norbert_Paul <norbertpauls_spambin@this.is.invalid> 2016-02-22 06:47 -0600
   → Re: Initialization of data members inside a class legalize+jeeves@mail.xmission.com (Richard) 2016-02-22 14:26 -0600
 
C++ refactoring test suite results updated legalize+jeeves@mail.xmission.com (Richard) 2016-02-20 07:16 -0600
 
Is <cstdlib> required? (1 reply) Joe Bentley <joe.foxhound@googlemail.com> 2016-02-16 07:03 -0600
   → Re: Is <cstdlib> required? Bo Persson <bop@gmb.dk> 2016-02-16 12:32 -0600
 
Alignment, placement new and struct with pointer to array of POD (5 replies) Daniel <danielaparker@googlemail.com> 2015-12-13 12:01 -0600
   → Re: Alignment, placement new and struct with pointer to array of POD Martin Bonner <martinfrompi@yahoo.co.uk> 2015-12-14 06:52 -0600
     → Re: Alignment, placement new and struct with pointer to array of POD Daniel <danielaparker@googlemail.com> 2015-12-15 07:08 -0600
       → Re: Alignment, placement new and struct with pointer to array of POD Martin Bonner <martinfrompi@yahoo.co.uk> 2015-12-15 13:55 -0600
   → Re: Alignment, placement new and struct with pointer to array of POD evansl <cppljevans@googlemail.com> 2016-01-11 06:46 -0600
     → Re: Alignment, placement new and struct with pointer to array of POD evansl <cppljevans@googlemail.com> 2016-01-12 07:21 -0600
 
Why does the following C++ program , DataServer.cpp, throws a segmentation fault at the exit of the extern "C" function, void func(void) shown in the bottom of this question? (3 replies) allswellthatendswell <FrankChang91@googlemail.com> 2016-01-04 06:55 -0600
   → Re: Why does the following C++ program , DataServer.cpp, throws a segmentation fault at the exit of the extern "C" function, void func(void) shown in the bottom of this question? Francis Glassborow <francis.glassborow@btinternet.com> 2016-01-04 10:08 -0600
   → Re: Why does the following C++ program , DataServer.cpp, throws a segmentation fault at the exit of the extern "C" function, void func(void) shown in the bottom of this question? Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> 2016-01-04 11:22 -0600
   → Re: Why does the following C++ program , DataServer.cpp, throws a segmentation fault at the exit of the extern "C" function, void func(void) shown in the bottom of this question? marlow.agents@googlemail.com 2016-01-12 07:22 -0600
 
std::any and std::exception_ptr johannes.gerd.becker@googlemail.com 2015-12-22 06:40 -0600
 
JavaScript developer interested in learning C/C++ Jerome Covington <jeromecovington@googlemail.com> 2015-12-03 13:04 -0600
 
[ANN] U++ 2015.2 released (rev 9251) Mirek Fidler <cxl@ntllib.org> 2015-12-02 06:45 -0600
 
std::list with cutom allocator (1 reply) hamparawa@googlemail.com 2015-11-15 08:05 -0600
   → Re: std::list with cutom allocator Daniel Krügler <daniel.kruegler@googlemail.com> 2015-11-15 14:25 -0600
 
What kinds of applications need C++ developers? (20 replies) Michael David Crawford <mdcrawford@googlemail.com> 2015-05-20 11:35 -0600
   → Re: What kinds of applications need C++ developers? "Jason C. McDonald" <indeliblebluepen@nospam.invalid> 2015-05-20 14:24 -0600
   → Re: What kinds of applications need C++ developers? Wouter van Ooijen <wouter@voti.nl> 2015-05-20 14:22 -0600
   → Re: What kinds of applications need C++ developers? James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> 2015-05-20 14:24 -0600
   → Re: What kinds of applications need C++ developers? Michael David Crawford <mdcrawford@googlemail.com> 2015-05-20 20:40 -0600
   → Re: What kinds of applications need C++ developers? David LaRue <huey.dll@gte.net> 2015-05-21 06:49 -0600
   → Re: What kinds of applications need C++ developers? "Walter H." <Walter.H-Nntp@mathemainzel.info> 2015-05-27 14:00 -0600
     → Re: What kinds of applications need C++ developers? Wouter van Ooijen <wouter@voti.nl> 2015-05-28 07:57 -0600
       → Re: What kinds of applications need C++ developers? Francis Glassborow <francis.glassborow@btinternet.com> 2015-05-29 10:46 -0600
         → Re: What kinds of applications need C++ developers? Martin Bonner <martinfrompi@yahoo.co.uk> 2015-05-29 12:24 -0600
           → Re: What kinds of applications need C++ developers? Bo Persson <bop@gmb.dk> 2015-05-30 07:39 -0600
         → Re: What kinds of applications need C++ developers? Wouter van Ooijen <wouter@voti.nl> 2015-05-29 15:32 -0600
         → Re: What kinds of applications need C++ developers? Peter Chapin <PChapin@vtc.vsc.edu> 2015-05-30 07:39 -0600
           → Re: What kinds of applications need C++ developers? Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> 2015-05-30 11:37 -0600
           → Re: What kinds of applications need C++ developers? legalize+jeeves@mail.xmission.com (Richard) 2015-06-02 05:50 -0600
     → Re: What kinds of applications need C++ developers? "James K. Lowden" <jklowden@speakeasy.net> 2015-05-28 15:08 -0600
       → Re: What kinds of applications need C++ developers? Francis Glassborow <francis.glassborow@btinternet.com> 2015-05-29 10:04 -0600
   → Re: What kinds of applications need C++ developers? pip010 <pip010@googlemail.com> 2015-08-03 06:56 -0600
   → Re: What kinds of applications need C++ developers? Cholo Lennon <chololennon@this.is.invalid> 2015-08-11 09:43 -0600
   → What kinds of applications need C++ developers? Jonathan Lee <jonathan.lizhijin@googlemail.com> 2015-10-08 07:16 -0600
   → Re: What kinds of applications need C++ developers? sandip.i.mahajan@googlemail.com 2015-11-09 14:29 -0600
 
std::stoi (7 replies) kiran <kiran.tangeeda@googlemail.com> 2015-11-04 06:56 -0600
   → Re: std::stoi Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> 2015-11-05 07:23 -0600
   → Re: std::stoi James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> 2015-11-05 07:23 -0600
   → Re: std::stoi Louis Krupp <lkrupp@nospam.pssw.com.invalid> 2015-11-05 07:24 -0600
   → Re: std::stoi Frank Tetzel <s1445051@mail.zih.tu-dresden.de> 2015-11-05 07:23 -0600
   → Re: std::stoi Elias Salomão Helou Neto <eshneto@googlemail.com> 2015-11-05 07:25 -0600
     → Re: std::stoi Francis Glassborow <francis.glassborow@btinternet.com> 2015-11-05 12:25 -0600
   → Re: std::stoi kiran <kiran.tangeeda@googlemail.com> 2015-11-05 15:36 -0600
 
Include precedence <> vs "" for system libraries (Unix-like OSes) (4 replies) Kim Walisch <kim.walisch@googlemail.com> 2015-10-26 08:42 -0600
   → Re: Include precedence <> vs "" for system libraries (Unix-like OSes) FredK <fred.l.kleinschmidt@googlemail.com> 2015-10-26 11:30 -0600
   → Re: Include precedence <> vs "" for system libraries (Unix-like OSes) James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> 2015-10-26 15:39 -0600
     → Re: Include precedence <> vs "" for system libraries (Unix-like OSes) marlow.agents@googlemail.com 2015-11-04 06:56 -0600
   → Re: Include precedence <> vs "" for system libraries (Unix-like OSes) "James K. Lowden" <jklowden@speakeasy.net> 2015-11-04 06:56 -0600
 
Decimal bignum class (2 replies) "Arthur Rubin (ronnirubin@sprintmail.com)" <arthur.rubin.669@googlemail.com> 2015-10-06 13:19 -0600
   → Re: Decimal bignum class Barry Schwarz <schwarzb@dqel.com> 2015-10-07 07:05 -0600
     → Re: Decimal bignum class Arthur Rubin <arthur.rubin.669@googlemail.com> 2015-10-08 07:14 -0600
 
reusing objects after std::vector.emplace (2 replies) Ralf Fassel <ralfixx@gmx.de> 2015-09-23 07:27 -0600
   → Re: reusing objects after std::vector.emplace Bo Persson <bop@gmb.dk> 2015-09-23 13:34 -0600
   → Re: reusing objects after std::vector.emplace Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> 2015-09-23 13:34 -0600
 
References to const (8 replies) Robert <rob1@invalid.net> 2015-07-29 16:30 -0600
   → Re: References to const legalize+jeeves@mail.xmission.com (Richard) 2015-07-29 20:41 -0600
     → Re: References to const legalize+jeeves@mail.xmission.com (Richard) 2015-07-31 07:12 -0600
       → Re: References to const "Alf P. Steinbach" <alf.p.steinbach+usenet@googlemail.com> 2015-08-01 07:32 -0600
   → Re: References to const Martin Bonner <martinfrompi@yahoo.co.uk> 2015-07-30 11:01 -0600
   → Re: References to const Jack Adrian Zappa <adrianh.bsc@googlemail.com> 2015-09-04 07:53 -0600
     → Re: References to const Martin Bonner <martinfrompi@yahoo.co.uk> 2015-09-11 07:01 -0600
       → Re: References to const Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> 2015-09-11 12:32 -0600
         → Re: References to const James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> 2015-09-12 13:57 -0600
 
Why is this ambiguous? (2 replies) DeMarcus <demarcus_at_hotmail_com@tellus.orb> 2015-09-03 07:39 -0600
   → Re: Why is this ambiguous? Jack Adrian Zappa <adrianh.bsc@googlemail.com> 2015-09-04 07:53 -0600
   → Re: Why is this ambiguous? Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> 2015-09-04 09:40 -0600
 
Why is initialization of a constant dependent type in a template parameter list disallowed by the standard? Jack Adrian Zappa <adrianh.bsc@googlemail.com> 2015-09-03 16:08 -0600
 
vector range constructor arnoschoedl@googlemail.com 2015-08-19 08:35 -0600
 
SFINAE vs error reporting vs std::get (3 replies) raskolnikov <magnicida@googlemail.com> 2015-08-04 09:49 -0600
   → Re: SFINAE vs error reporting vs std::get Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> 2015-08-05 08:34 -0600
     → Re: SFINAE vs error reporting vs std::get raskolnikov <magnicida@googlemail.com> 2015-08-10 06:43 -0600
       → Re: SFINAE vs error reporting vs std::get Louis Dionne <ldionne.2@googlemail.com> 2015-08-11 14:27 -0600
 
Avoid 'int' and associates. (26 replies) Mr Flibble <flibbleREMOVETHISBIT@i42.co.uk> 2015-06-14 06:36 -0600
   → Re: Avoid 'int' and associates. Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> 2015-06-14 18:00 -0600
   → Re: Avoid 'int' and associates. Francis Glassborow <francis.glassborow@btinternet.com> 2015-06-14 18:07 -0600
   → Re: Avoid 'int' and associates. "James K. Lowden" <jklowden@speakeasy.net> 2015-06-14 18:11 -0600
   → Re: Avoid 'int' and associates. James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> 2015-06-14 18:11 -0600
   → Re: Avoid 'int' and associates. Maciej Sobczak <see.my.homepage@googlemail.com> 2015-06-14 18:11 -0600
   → Re: Avoid 'int' and associates. Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> 2015-06-14 20:24 -0600
     → Re: Avoid 'int' and associates. David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> 2015-06-15 07:13 -0600
       → Re: Avoid 'int' and associates. Francis Glassborow <francis.glassborow@btinternet.com> 2015-06-15 11:22 -0600
         → Re: Avoid 'int' and associates. Mr Flibble <flibbleREMOVETHISBIT@i42.co.uk> 2015-06-15 13:02 -0600
           → Re: Avoid 'int' and associates. Francis Glassborow <francis.glassborow@btinternet.com> 2015-06-15 14:54 -0600
             → Re: Avoid 'int' and associates. Mr Flibble <flibbleREMOVETHISBIT@i42.co.uk> 2015-06-15 15:54 -0600
               → Re: Avoid 'int' and associates. James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> 2015-06-15 21:04 -0600
                 → Re: Avoid 'int' and associates. David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> 2015-06-16 07:05 -0600
                 → Re: Avoid 'int' and associates. James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> 2015-06-16 14:59 -0600
                 → Re: Avoid 'int' and associates. David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> 2015-06-16 16:47 -0600
               → Re: Avoid 'int' and associates. scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) 2015-06-16 09:54 -0600
                 → Re: Avoid 'int' and associates. legalize+jeeves@mail.xmission.com (Richard) 2015-06-16 14:59 -0600
                 → Re: Avoid 'int' and associates. Mr Flibble <flibbleREMOVETHISBIT@i42.co.uk> 2015-06-16 16:47 -0600
               → Re: Avoid 'int' and associates. "Chris M. Thomasson" <nospam@nospam.nospam> 2015-06-16 15:03 -0600
                 → Re: Avoid 'int' and associates. Mr Flibble <flibbleREMOVETHISBIT@i42.co.uk> 2015-06-16 16:47 -0600
                 → Re: Avoid 'int' and associates. pip010 <pip010@googlemail.com> 2015-08-03 06:54 -0600
                 → Re: Avoid 'int' and associates. maddoxr@acm.org 2015-08-03 10:01 -0600
             → Re: Avoid 'int' and associates. James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> 2015-06-15 21:04 -0600
           → Re: Avoid 'int' and associates. James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> 2015-06-15 15:55 -0600
         → Re: Avoid 'int' and associates. David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> 2015-06-16 07:04 -0600
   → Re: Avoid 'int' and associates. Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> 2015-06-27 14:17 -0600
 
variant vs strict aliasing rules (1 reply) arnoschoedl@googlemail.com 2015-07-06 08:13 -0600
   → Re: variant vs strict aliasing rules Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> 2015-07-06 13:47 -0600
 
Available C++ Libraries FAQ Nikki Locke <nikki@trumphurst.com> 2015-07-02 06:47 -0600
 
Template function using template-template parameters (5 replies) Kurt <kurt.e.mccall@nasa.gov> 2015-06-24 07:13 -0600
   → Re: Template function using template-template parameters Daniel Krügler <daniel.kruegler@googlemail.com> 2015-06-24 13:07 -0600
     → Re: Template function using template-template parameters Kurt <kurt.e.mccall@nasa.gov> 2015-06-26 14:13 -0600
       → Re: Template function using template-template parameters Daniel Krügler <daniel.kruegler@googlemail.com> 2015-06-27 07:22 -0600
         → Re: Template function using template-template parameters Kurt <kurt.e.mccall@nasa.gov> 2015-06-30 13:32 -0600
   → Re: Template function using template-template parameters Cassio Neri <cassio.neri@googlemail.com> 2015-06-24 13:06 -0600
 
The core of the core of the big data solutions -- Map (2 replies) pww19710430@googlemail.com 2015-04-07 06:51 -0600
   → Re: The core of the core of the big data solutions -- Map Wenwei Peng <pww19710430@googlemail.com> 2015-06-03 08:43 -0600
     → Re: The core of the core of the big data solutions -- Map "James K. Lowden" <jklowden@speakeasy.net> 2015-06-03 12:56 -0600

~Page 1 of ~24 (articles 7276–7448) Older →


csiph-web