Groups > comp.lang.basic.visual.misc > #1214

Re: invoking on the UI thread

From	Jason Keats <jkeats@melbpcDeleteThis.org.au>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.basic.visual.misc
Subject	Re: invoking on the UI thread
Date	2012-06-09 03:59 +1000
Organization	Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID	<jqteid$m9m$1@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink)
References	(7 earlier) <jqnu2q$8m9$1@online.de> <jqoe5g$564$1@dont-email.me> <jqop4v$c81$1@dont-email.me> <jqsdar$t6f$1@dont-email.me> <jqssal$i2f$1@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw

Tom Shelton wrote:
> It is not "completely different". In fact, it's mostly the same with
> some additional features. The mostly the same stuff, is why I don't use
> it.

Most (non-GUI) VB6 code runs unchanged in VB.NET - which is why I do use 
it. It's usually just a matter of searching and replacing a few data 
types: eg Long to Int32 and Integer to Int16.

I see no advantage in using C# over VB.NET (for a VB6 programmer).

Back to comp.lang.basic.visual.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: invoking on the UI thread Tom Shelton <tom_shelton@comcast.invalid> - 2012-06-04 07:43 -0600
  Re: invoking on the UI thread "Mike Williams" <Mike@WhiskyAndCoke.com> - 2012-06-04 22:36 +0100
    Re: invoking on the UI thread Tom Shelton <tom_shelton@comcast.invalid> - 2012-06-04 15:40 -0600
    Re: invoking on the UI thread "Theo Tress" <rbk@online.de> - 2012-06-05 16:17 +0200
      Re: invoking on the UI thread "Mike Williams" <Mike@WhiskyAndCoke.com> - 2012-06-05 18:34 +0100
        Re: invoking on the UI thread "Theo Tress" <rbk@online.de> - 2012-06-06 10:58 +0200
          Re: invoking on the UI thread "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2012-06-06 09:19 -0400
            Re: invoking on the UI thread "Theo Tress" <rbk@online.de> - 2012-06-06 17:46 +0200
              Re: invoking on the UI thread "Mike Williams" <Mike@WhiskyAndCoke.com> - 2012-06-06 21:22 +0100
                Re: invoking on the UI thread Tom Shelton <tom_shelton@comcast.invalid> - 2012-06-06 17:29 -0600
                Re: invoking on the UI thread "DaveO" <djo@dial.pipex.com> - 2012-06-07 10:53 +0100
                Re: invoking on the UI thread "Mike Williams" <Mike@WhiskyAndCoke.com> - 2012-06-08 09:32 +0100
                Re: invoking on the UI thread Tom Shelton <tom_shelton@comcast.invalid> - 2012-06-08 06:48 -0600
                Re: invoking on the UI thread "DaveO" <djo@dial.pipex.com> - 2012-06-08 14:52 +0100
                Re: invoking on the UI thread Tom Shelton <tom_shelton@comcast.invalid> - 2012-06-08 09:23 -0600
                Re: invoking on the UI thread "DaveO" <djo@dial.pipex.com> - 2012-06-08 16:50 +0100
                Re: invoking on the UI thread Tom Shelton <tom_shelton@comcast.invalid> - 2012-06-08 10:23 -0600
                Re: invoking on the UI thread "DaveO" <djo@dial.pipex.com> - 2012-06-11 09:56 +0100
                Re: invoking on the UI thread "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2012-06-08 14:21 -0400
                Re: invoking on the UI thread Tom Shelton <tom_shelton@comcast.invalid> - 2012-06-08 12:50 -0600
                Re: invoking on the UI thread "Mike Williams" <Mike@WhiskyAndCoke.com> - 2012-06-08 23:15 +0100
                Re: invoking on the UI thread Jason Keats <jkeats@melbpcDeleteThis.org.au> - 2012-06-09 03:59 +1000
                Re: invoking on the UI thread Tom Shelton <tom_shelton@comcast.invalid> - 2012-06-08 12:06 -0600
                Re: invoking on the UI thread "Mike Williams" <Mike@WhiskyAndCoke.com> - 2012-06-08 23:10 +0100
                Re: invoking on the UI thread GS <gs@somewhere.net> - 2012-06-08 13:07 -0400
                Re: invoking on the UI thread "Theo Tress" <rbk@online.de> - 2012-06-07 11:21 +0200
                Re: invoking on the UI thread "Farnsworth" <nospam@nospam.com> - 2012-06-07 06:47 -0400

csiph-web