Groups > comp.lang.basic.visual.misc > #1181

Re: invoking on the UI thread

From	"Theo Tress" <rbk@online.de>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.basic.visual.misc
Subject	Re: invoking on the UI thread
Date	2012-06-07 11:21 +0200
Organization	1&1 Internet AG
Message-ID	<jqprsh$co$1@online.de> (permalink)
References	(4 earlier) <jqlfvf$90g$1@dont-email.me> <jqn63o$mvo$1@online.de> <jqnlb0$ues$1@dont-email.me> <jqnu2q$8m9$1@online.de> <jqoe5g$564$1@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw

> Incidentally, Shelton is often defended by someone from Germany

Perhaps we in Germany prefer arguments by brain rather than by balls?


Ok, I understand your animosity against dotnet enthusiasts. I myself think 
introducing VB.net as "Visual Basic" with such a wide gap to VB6 was a big 
strategic error, I think MS loses a lot of competent programers and only 
gains newbies for them. But that's another story.

Back to the roots: His answer was correct, no dotnet promoting, and even in 
the proper newsgroup (you know what .misc means?), so you simply have no 
right to bash on such a message. That's all what's to say.

Bye.
TT

Back to comp.lang.basic.visual.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: invoking on the UI thread Tom Shelton <tom_shelton@comcast.invalid> - 2012-06-04 07:43 -0600
  Re: invoking on the UI thread "Mike Williams" <Mike@WhiskyAndCoke.com> - 2012-06-04 22:36 +0100
    Re: invoking on the UI thread Tom Shelton <tom_shelton@comcast.invalid> - 2012-06-04 15:40 -0600
    Re: invoking on the UI thread "Theo Tress" <rbk@online.de> - 2012-06-05 16:17 +0200
      Re: invoking on the UI thread "Mike Williams" <Mike@WhiskyAndCoke.com> - 2012-06-05 18:34 +0100
        Re: invoking on the UI thread "Theo Tress" <rbk@online.de> - 2012-06-06 10:58 +0200
          Re: invoking on the UI thread "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2012-06-06 09:19 -0400
            Re: invoking on the UI thread "Theo Tress" <rbk@online.de> - 2012-06-06 17:46 +0200
              Re: invoking on the UI thread "Mike Williams" <Mike@WhiskyAndCoke.com> - 2012-06-06 21:22 +0100
                Re: invoking on the UI thread Tom Shelton <tom_shelton@comcast.invalid> - 2012-06-06 17:29 -0600
                Re: invoking on the UI thread "DaveO" <djo@dial.pipex.com> - 2012-06-07 10:53 +0100
                Re: invoking on the UI thread "Mike Williams" <Mike@WhiskyAndCoke.com> - 2012-06-08 09:32 +0100
                Re: invoking on the UI thread Tom Shelton <tom_shelton@comcast.invalid> - 2012-06-08 06:48 -0600
                Re: invoking on the UI thread "DaveO" <djo@dial.pipex.com> - 2012-06-08 14:52 +0100
                Re: invoking on the UI thread Tom Shelton <tom_shelton@comcast.invalid> - 2012-06-08 09:23 -0600
                Re: invoking on the UI thread "DaveO" <djo@dial.pipex.com> - 2012-06-08 16:50 +0100
                Re: invoking on the UI thread Tom Shelton <tom_shelton@comcast.invalid> - 2012-06-08 10:23 -0600
                Re: invoking on the UI thread "DaveO" <djo@dial.pipex.com> - 2012-06-11 09:56 +0100
                Re: invoking on the UI thread "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2012-06-08 14:21 -0400
                Re: invoking on the UI thread Tom Shelton <tom_shelton@comcast.invalid> - 2012-06-08 12:50 -0600
                Re: invoking on the UI thread "Mike Williams" <Mike@WhiskyAndCoke.com> - 2012-06-08 23:15 +0100
                Re: invoking on the UI thread Jason Keats <jkeats@melbpcDeleteThis.org.au> - 2012-06-09 03:59 +1000
                Re: invoking on the UI thread Tom Shelton <tom_shelton@comcast.invalid> - 2012-06-08 12:06 -0600
                Re: invoking on the UI thread "Mike Williams" <Mike@WhiskyAndCoke.com> - 2012-06-08 23:10 +0100
                Re: invoking on the UI thread GS <gs@somewhere.net> - 2012-06-08 13:07 -0400
                Re: invoking on the UI thread "Theo Tress" <rbk@online.de> - 2012-06-07 11:21 +0200
                Re: invoking on the UI thread "Farnsworth" <nospam@nospam.com> - 2012-06-07 06:47 -0400

csiph-web