Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.basic.visual.misc > #235
| From | "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.basic.visual.misc, microsoft.public.vb.general.discussion |
| Subject | Re: MS Word problem |
| Date | 2011-06-11 08:39 -0400 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <isvnh9$g3h$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <isv6bl$osg$1@dont-email.me> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
|I see that Micro$oft have been caught thieving again! The evil bastards | attempt to screw everybody into the ground by aggressively attempting to | patent just about everything they do, often including things they have | themselves previously stolen, and yet when they want to include somone | else's work into their own bloatware they just go ahead and steal it. They | have in recent years been caught behaving like coporate gansters in Jamaica | and now they have been caught stealing stuff from Canada. What a bunch of | unprincipled bastards! | | http://uk.news.yahoo.com/microsoft-must-pay-copyright-cash-084855404.html | Is that something to celebrate? As I understand it, i4i has patented something akin to object embedding and is applying it to a publicly standardized file format. Shouldn't we blame the patent office for this? Saying that MS has "got their due" only strengthens the overall system of copyright and patent "booty", which ends up creating a tech. world ruled by giants, while the little people have to pay protection money. One might call it the World of the iWarlords... if Steve Jobs hasn't already been granted a copyright on "i". :)
Back to comp.lang.basic.visual.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
MS Word problem "Mike Williams" <Mike@WhiskyAndCoke.com> - 2011-06-11 08:43 +0100
Re: MS Word problem "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2011-06-11 08:39 -0400
Re: MS Word problem "Auric__" <not.my.real@email.address> - 2011-06-11 15:10 +0000
Re: MS Word problem "Access Developer" <accdevel@gmail.com> - 2011-06-12 12:41 -0500
Re: MS Word problem Michael Cole <invalid@microsoft.com> - 2011-06-13 15:04 +1000
Re: MS Word problem "mbyerley" <mbyerley@byerley.net> - 2011-06-13 09:52 -0400
Re: MS Word problem Michael Cole <invalid@microsoft.com> - 2011-06-14 10:32 +1000
Re: MS Word problem "mbyerley" <mbyerley@byerley.net> - 2011-06-13 23:00 -0400
Re: MS Word problem "StrandElectric" <Strand@dummyspit> - 2011-06-12 05:18 +1000
Re: MS Word problem "David Kaye" <sfdavidkaye2@yahoo.com> - 2011-06-11 12:54 -0700
Re: MS Word problem DanS <t.h.i.s.n.t.h.a.t@r.o.a.d.r.u.n.n.e.r.c.o.m> - 2011-06-12 11:07 -0500
Re: MS Word problem "mbyerley" <mbyerley@byerley.net> - 2011-06-12 16:43 -0400
Re: MS Word problem "StrandElectric" <Strand@dummyspit> - 2011-06-13 07:07 +1000
Re: MS Word problem David Kerber <dkerber@WarrenRogersAssociates.invalid> - 2011-06-13 11:18 -0400
Re: MS Word problem DanS <t.h.i.s.n.t.h.a.t@r.o.a.d.r.u.n.n.e.r.c.o.m> - 2011-06-15 11:51 -0500
Re: MS Word problem David Kerber <dkerber@WarrenRogersAssociates.invalid> - 2011-06-15 13:16 -0400
Re: MS Word problem Dee Earley <dee.earley@icode.co.uk> - 2011-06-13 09:15 +0100
csiph-web