Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.basic.visual.misc > #241

Re: MS Word problem

From "Access Developer" <accdevel@gmail.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.basic.visual.misc, microsoft.public.vb.general.discussion
Subject Re: MS Word problem
Date 2011-06-12 12:41 -0500
Message-ID <95kc29F35sU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References <isv6bl$osg$1@dont-email.me> <Xns9F01534B5BD59auricauricauricauric@88.198.244.100>

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


"Auric__" <not.my.real@email.address> wrote

 > Mike Williams wrote:
 >
 >> I see that Micro$oft have been caught
 >> thieving again!
 >
 > What does this have to do with VB?
 > *THAT* at least they paid for.

Mike's got a hardon against Microsoft, so cut him a little slack for being 
off-topic. There aren't enough posts here now for it to matter as much as it 
once did.

The U.S. Patent Office, knowing little about computers or software, began 
granting unwarranted software patents years ago, and companies of all sizes 
are just taking advantage of the Patent Office's idiocy.  Everybody and the 
fleas on their dogs are applying for patents, and having them granted, for 
trivial, non-unique, non-original work and then suing everyone in sight.

It's not just Microsoft, and it's not 'just desserts'.

 Larry 

Back to comp.lang.basic.visual.misc | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

MS Word problem "Mike Williams" <Mike@WhiskyAndCoke.com> - 2011-06-11 08:43 +0100
  Re: MS Word problem "Mayayana" <mayayana@invalid.nospam> - 2011-06-11 08:39 -0400
  Re: MS Word problem "Auric__" <not.my.real@email.address> - 2011-06-11 15:10 +0000
    Re: MS Word problem "Access Developer" <accdevel@gmail.com> - 2011-06-12 12:41 -0500
      Re: MS Word problem Michael Cole <invalid@microsoft.com> - 2011-06-13 15:04 +1000
        Re: MS Word problem "mbyerley" <mbyerley@byerley.net> - 2011-06-13 09:52 -0400
          Re: MS Word problem Michael Cole <invalid@microsoft.com> - 2011-06-14 10:32 +1000
            Re: MS Word problem "mbyerley" <mbyerley@byerley.net> - 2011-06-13 23:00 -0400
  Re: MS Word problem "StrandElectric" <Strand@dummyspit> - 2011-06-12 05:18 +1000
  Re: MS Word problem "David Kaye" <sfdavidkaye2@yahoo.com> - 2011-06-11 12:54 -0700
  Re: MS Word problem DanS <t.h.i.s.n.t.h.a.t@r.o.a.d.r.u.n.n.e.r.c.o.m> - 2011-06-12 11:07 -0500
    Re: MS Word problem "mbyerley" <mbyerley@byerley.net> - 2011-06-12 16:43 -0400
      Re: MS Word problem "StrandElectric" <Strand@dummyspit> - 2011-06-13 07:07 +1000
      Re: MS Word problem David Kerber <dkerber@WarrenRogersAssociates.invalid> - 2011-06-13 11:18 -0400
        Re: MS Word problem DanS <t.h.i.s.n.t.h.a.t@r.o.a.d.r.u.n.n.e.r.c.o.m> - 2011-06-15 11:51 -0500
          Re: MS Word problem David Kerber <dkerber@WarrenRogersAssociates.invalid> - 2011-06-15 13:16 -0400
  Re: MS Word problem Dee Earley <dee.earley@icode.co.uk> - 2011-06-13 09:15 +0100

csiph-web