Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.basic.misc > #301
| From | Todd Vargo <tlvargo@sbcglobal.netz> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.basic.misc |
| Subject | Re: Which basic ? |
| Date | 2012-08-08 19:57 -0400 |
| Organization | albasani.net |
| Message-ID | <jvuuda$k77$1@news.albasani.net> (permalink) |
| References | <jvsto9$gt9$1@speranza.aioe.org> <p3k428t5phlbasl063id5clcet2758d6s1@4ax.com> <jvtoa8$cjc$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
On 8/8/2012 9:07 AM, himself wrote: > ralph wrote: > >>> On Wed, 8 Aug 2012 05:34:01 +0000 (UTC), "himself" <some@where.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>>> >>>>> Hi All, >>>>> I have a book published in 1985 with programs written in basic. >>>>> I need to run one to find where I am going wrong converting to >>>>> Python. It uses for example, line numbers, def fna(x)...., gosub, >>>>> goto etc. >>>>> >>>>> I have qbasic45 running in dosbox but the syntax is different. >>>>> >>>>> Is there a more appropriate Basic program? I am running win64 but >>>>> could fire up ubuntu. >>>>> >>>>> Just a hobbyist so go easy on me :) >>>>> >>> >>> What's the book? >>> >>> The book itself should contain a reference somewhere to the flavor of >>> BASIC it is using. >>> >>> -ralph > > > It is an RSGB publication, Amateur Radio Software, he does mention that > it will be generic Basic that may need adapting. > I have adapted the code in qbasic and have a result as such using > online calculators. > It calculates distance and bearing. > Will type out the original and post. Thanks for the feedback. > Rog > Most likely it should run in qbasic unmodified. Type it verbatim into a text editor, save and try to run it with out modifications. You will receive a message if it uses any commands that were omitted from qbasic. See help in qbasic, Contents on the Version Differences page and at the bottom of the page, Unsupported Keywords. -- Todd Vargo (Post questions to group only. Remove "z" to email personal messages)
Back to comp.lang.basic.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Which basic ? "himself" <some@where.com> - 2012-08-08 05:34 +0000
Re: Which basic ? "Auric__" <not.my.real@email.address> - 2012-08-08 10:10 +0000
Re: Which basic ? Helmut_Meukel <Helmut_Meukel@bn-hof.invalid> - 2012-08-08 13:45 +0200
Re: Which basic ? "Auric__" <not.my.real@email.address> - 2012-08-08 12:47 +0000
Re: Which basic ? Helmut_Meukel <Helmut_Meukel@bn-hof.invalid> - 2012-08-09 22:48 +0200
Re: Which basic ? "himself" <some@where.com> - 2012-08-08 13:56 +0000
Re: Which basic ? "Auric__" <not.my.real@email.address> - 2012-08-08 20:28 +0000
Re: Which basic ? ralph <nt_consulting64@yahoo.com> - 2012-08-08 06:43 -0500
Re: Which basic ? "himself" <some@where.com> - 2012-08-08 13:07 +0000
Re: Which basic ? ralph <nt_consulting64@yahoo.com> - 2012-08-08 08:50 -0500
Re: Which basic ? Todd Vargo <tlvargo@sbcglobal.netz> - 2012-08-08 19:57 -0400
Re: Which basic ? nospam <nospam@nospam.com> - 2012-08-09 20:36 +0100
Re: Which basic ? "himself" <some@where.com> - 2012-08-09 23:49 +0000
Re: Which basic ? "news@rtrussell.co.uk" <news@rtrussell.co.uk> - 2012-08-10 09:12 -0700
Re: Which basic ? "Auric__" <not.my.real@email.address> - 2012-08-11 00:12 +0000
Re: Which basic ? "news@rtrussell.co.uk" <news@rtrussell.co.uk> - 2012-08-12 04:48 -0700
Re: Which basic ? "Auric__" <not.my.real@email.address> - 2012-08-12 20:07 +0000
csiph-web