Groups > comp.graphics.apps.gnuplot > #3432

Re: fitting for Bateman equation returns NaN

From	Michael Okuntsov <okuntsov.mikhail@yandex.ru>
Newsgroups	comp.graphics.apps.gnuplot
Subject	Re: fitting for Bateman equation returns NaN
Date	2016-11-03 17:16 +0700
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<nvf2p3$5ci$2@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References	<c9696e77-4fc9-4466-9175-bff4ac3d6ef0@googlegroups.com> <nvcvov$qad$1@dont-email.me> <65025da6-a456-46d5-b987-2b6d8dcbc692@googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw

> Hi Michael,
>
> Thank you! it works great now. Why do we define B, though, and is the -0.1 arbitrary? What do I define N or M as, if I want to fix A, B and fit via N or M?
>
> Thanks :)
>
Also, we define B because you are fitting via this variable. If you fit 
via N or M, you may have to initialize this variable as well.

Back to comp.graphics.apps.gnuplot | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

fitting for Bateman equation returns NaN apsara@connect.hku.hk - 2016-11-02 07:44 -0700
  Re: fitting for Bateman equation returns NaN Michael Okuntsov <okuntsov.mikhail@yandex.ru> - 2016-11-02 22:12 +0700
    Re: fitting for Bateman equation returns NaN apsara@connect.hku.hk - 2016-11-03 02:41 -0700
      Re: fitting for Bateman equation returns NaN Michael Okuntsov <okuntsov.mikhail@yandex.ru> - 2016-11-03 17:11 +0700
      Re: fitting for Bateman equation returns NaN Michael Okuntsov <okuntsov.mikhail@yandex.ru> - 2016-11-03 17:16 +0700
      Re: fitting for Bateman equation returns NaN Hans-Bernhard Bröker <HBBroeker@t-online.de> - 2016-11-03 15:38 +0100
        Re: fitting for Bateman equation returns NaN Dan Connelly <djconnel@gmail.com> - 2016-11-04 15:31 -0700

csiph-web