Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Michael Okuntsov Newsgroups: comp.graphics.apps.gnuplot Subject: Re: fitting for Bateman equation returns NaN Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2016 17:16:30 +0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 9 Message-ID: References: <65025da6-a456-46d5-b987-2b6d8dcbc692@googlegroups.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2016 10:16:03 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="3befe2ee528d81696d442400693365d9"; logging-data="5522"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19jcoPFE5gRwoVSDM2A0kLW" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 In-Reply-To: <65025da6-a456-46d5-b987-2b6d8dcbc692@googlegroups.com> Cancel-Lock: sha1:asD6KNly0CWI75LVTMInb4WAoPw= Xref: csiph.com comp.graphics.apps.gnuplot:3432 > Hi Michael, > > Thank you! it works great now. Why do we define B, though, and is the -0.1 arbitrary? What do I define N or M as, if I want to fix A, B and fit via N or M? > > Thanks :) > Also, we define B because you are fitting via this variable. If you fit via N or M, you may have to initialize this variable as well.