Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
| Path | csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder1.hal-mli.net!news.glorb.com!news.astraweb.com!border6.newsrouter.astraweb.com!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Ben Finney <bignose+hates-spam@benfinney.id.au> |
| Newsgroups | comp.databases |
| Subject | Re: joining tables and the order changes |
| References | <96356369-58eb-4a52-a72b-1687558871e1@e17g2000prj.googlegroups.com> |
| X-Public-Key-ID | 0xAC128405 |
| X-Public-Key-Fingerprint | 517C F14B B2F3 98B0 CB35 4855 B8B2 4C06 AC12 8405 |
| X-Public-Key-URL | http://www.benfinney.id.au/contact/bfinney-pubkey.asc |
| X-Post-From | Ben Finney <bignose+hates-spam@benfinney.id.au> |
| Date | Thu, 23 Jun 2011 07:47:28 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <8739j1pmhb.fsf@benfinney.id.au> (permalink) |
| User-Agent | Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:28ueFLZYOtxqImG3BeeLqH7IrFs= |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=utf-8 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 8bit |
| Lines | 30 |
| Organization | Unlimited download news at news.astraweb.com |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 212caa47.news.astraweb.com |
| X-Trace | DXC=fSiX1CT[K\EMnc]O[a9m]EL?0kYOcDh@JSBc;\8ijUdK:F=AP1hJGNMUGD@iN[Hd?OhD>jS_18g;N |
| Xref | x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.databases:88 |
Show key headers only | View raw
shawrie <tourerukcom@googlemail.com> writes: > When i display records from deal basket for a specific deal number it > displays the record fine. When i create a view and link the 2 tables > by product code so i can display description the order of records > change???? One possibility is that the problem is caused by too many question marks :-) Another is that you've forgotten that SQL result sets are allowed to come back in *any* order, and can change from one moment to the next, unless you use an ‘ORDER BY’ clause. > How can i display the records in the dealsbasket in the order they > were imported into the table The RDBMS has no obligation to even remember what order they were inserted into the table. Most will not, instead optimising storage internally for speed purposes. If you want the records to have a particular sequence, then you need them to have a field which can be the subject of an ‘ORDER BY’ clause. Likely candidates are the real-world identifier for the product or deal. -- \ “Following fashion and the status quo is easy. Thinking about | `\ your users' lives and creating something practical is much | _o__) harder.” —Ryan Singer, 2008-07-09 | Ben Finney
Back to comp.databases | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
joining tables and the order changes shawrie <tourerukcom@googlemail.com> - 2011-06-22 07:44 -0700
Re: joining tables and the order changes Ben Finney <bignose+hates-spam@benfinney.id.au> - 2011-06-23 07:47 +1000
Re: joining tables and the order changes Arthur Ward <art.ward@noreply.xx> - 2011-06-23 08:50 +0000
Re: joining tables and the order changes David Kerber <dkerber@WarrenRogersAssociates.invalid> - 2011-06-23 09:09 -0400
Re: joining tables and the order changes Arthur Ward <art.ward@noreply.xx> - 2011-06-23 13:23 +0000
Re: joining tables and the order changes David Kerber <dkerber@WarrenRogersAssociates.invalid> - 2011-06-23 14:35 -0400
Re: joining tables and the order changes toledobythesea@yahoo.ca - 2011-06-24 10:40 -0700
Re: joining tables and the order changes Arthur Ward <art.ward@noreply.xx> - 2011-06-25 12:33 +0000
Re: joining tables and the order changes paul c <toledobythesea@yahoo.ca> - 2011-06-25 14:44 -0700
Re: joining tables and the order changes paul c <toledobythesea@yahoo.ca> - 2011-06-25 14:53 -0700
Re: joining tables and the order changes Lee Fesperman <firstsql@gmail.com> - 2011-07-04 00:39 -0700
csiph-web