Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register


Groups > comp.databases > #94

Re: joining tables and the order changes

From toledobythesea@yahoo.ca
Newsgroups comp.databases
Subject Re: joining tables and the order changes
Date 2011-06-24 10:40 -0700
Organization http://groups.google.com
Message-ID <906dcc5e-dc0a-4e75-9e7d-09dcfb04f193@g12g2000yqd.googlegroups.com> (permalink)
References <96356369-58eb-4a52-a72b-1687558871e1@e17g2000prj.googlegroups.com> <ituuo7$7cd$1@speranza.aioe.org>

Show all headers | View raw


On Jun 23, 1:50 am, Arthur Ward <art.w...@noreply.xx> wrote:
...
> SQL databases follow the Information Principle, which requires that all
> the infromation content of the database is represented explicitly as
> values of attributes of rows *and in NO OTHER WAY*. If one fact must
> be distinguised from another in terms of the time (or sequence) at
> which it became known, then the time (or sequence) must be part of the
> fact. Once you have the sequence information you can use it to order
> the facts when you finally report them.
...

I'd rather say that relational db's depend on the Information
Principle.

It is widely ignored, such as when arguments against updating certain
views are made.  These arguments remind of the pedestrian who looks in
two directions then steps forward directly into the muck.  Even CJ
Date opens the door in something he wrote recently giving a predicate
for the usual Suppliers relation of something like "Supplier S# is
under Contract".  No 'Contract' attribute in site.

I could agree that in this sense SQL databases 'follow the Information
Principle', if only they didn't prevent certain view inserts and
deletes!  But I gather they do, so they aren't 'following' anything
except arbitrariness, which is what the IP was intended to counteract.

Back to comp.databases | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

joining tables and the order changes shawrie <tourerukcom@googlemail.com> - 2011-06-22 07:44 -0700
  Re: joining tables and the order changes Ben Finney <bignose+hates-spam@benfinney.id.au> - 2011-06-23 07:47 +1000
  Re: joining tables and the order changes Arthur Ward <art.ward@noreply.xx> - 2011-06-23 08:50 +0000
    Re: joining tables and the order changes David Kerber <dkerber@WarrenRogersAssociates.invalid> - 2011-06-23 09:09 -0400
      Re: joining tables and the order changes Arthur Ward <art.ward@noreply.xx> - 2011-06-23 13:23 +0000
        Re: joining tables and the order changes David Kerber <dkerber@WarrenRogersAssociates.invalid> - 2011-06-23 14:35 -0400
    Re: joining tables and the order changes toledobythesea@yahoo.ca - 2011-06-24 10:40 -0700
      Re: joining tables and the order changes Arthur Ward <art.ward@noreply.xx> - 2011-06-25 12:33 +0000
        Re: joining tables and the order changes paul c <toledobythesea@yahoo.ca> - 2011-06-25 14:44 -0700
        Re: joining tables and the order changes paul c <toledobythesea@yahoo.ca> - 2011-06-25 14:53 -0700
          Re: joining tables and the order changes Lee Fesperman <firstsql@gmail.com> - 2011-07-04 00:39 -0700

csiph-web