Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
| From | toledobythesea@yahoo.ca |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.databases |
| Subject | Re: joining tables and the order changes |
| Date | 2011-06-24 10:40 -0700 |
| Organization | http://groups.google.com |
| Message-ID | <906dcc5e-dc0a-4e75-9e7d-09dcfb04f193@g12g2000yqd.googlegroups.com> (permalink) |
| References | <96356369-58eb-4a52-a72b-1687558871e1@e17g2000prj.googlegroups.com> <ituuo7$7cd$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
On Jun 23, 1:50 am, Arthur Ward <art.w...@noreply.xx> wrote: ... > SQL databases follow the Information Principle, which requires that all > the infromation content of the database is represented explicitly as > values of attributes of rows *and in NO OTHER WAY*. If one fact must > be distinguised from another in terms of the time (or sequence) at > which it became known, then the time (or sequence) must be part of the > fact. Once you have the sequence information you can use it to order > the facts when you finally report them. ... I'd rather say that relational db's depend on the Information Principle. It is widely ignored, such as when arguments against updating certain views are made. These arguments remind of the pedestrian who looks in two directions then steps forward directly into the muck. Even CJ Date opens the door in something he wrote recently giving a predicate for the usual Suppliers relation of something like "Supplier S# is under Contract". No 'Contract' attribute in site. I could agree that in this sense SQL databases 'follow the Information Principle', if only they didn't prevent certain view inserts and deletes! But I gather they do, so they aren't 'following' anything except arbitrariness, which is what the IP was intended to counteract.
Back to comp.databases | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
joining tables and the order changes shawrie <tourerukcom@googlemail.com> - 2011-06-22 07:44 -0700
Re: joining tables and the order changes Ben Finney <bignose+hates-spam@benfinney.id.au> - 2011-06-23 07:47 +1000
Re: joining tables and the order changes Arthur Ward <art.ward@noreply.xx> - 2011-06-23 08:50 +0000
Re: joining tables and the order changes David Kerber <dkerber@WarrenRogersAssociates.invalid> - 2011-06-23 09:09 -0400
Re: joining tables and the order changes Arthur Ward <art.ward@noreply.xx> - 2011-06-23 13:23 +0000
Re: joining tables and the order changes David Kerber <dkerber@WarrenRogersAssociates.invalid> - 2011-06-23 14:35 -0400
Re: joining tables and the order changes toledobythesea@yahoo.ca - 2011-06-24 10:40 -0700
Re: joining tables and the order changes Arthur Ward <art.ward@noreply.xx> - 2011-06-25 12:33 +0000
Re: joining tables and the order changes paul c <toledobythesea@yahoo.ca> - 2011-06-25 14:44 -0700
Re: joining tables and the order changes paul c <toledobythesea@yahoo.ca> - 2011-06-25 14:53 -0700
Re: joining tables and the order changes Lee Fesperman <firstsql@gmail.com> - 2011-07-04 00:39 -0700
csiph-web