Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
| From | David Kerber <dkerber@WarrenRogersAssociates.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.databases |
| Subject | Re: joining tables and the order changes |
| Date | 2011-06-23 14:35 -0400 |
| Organization | Warren Rogers Associates |
| Message-ID | <MPG.286d51711a724bf9989730@news.eternal-september.org> (permalink) |
| References | <96356369-58eb-4a52-a72b-1687558871e1@e17g2000prj.googlegroups.com> <ituuo7$7cd$1@speranza.aioe.org> <MPG.286d051ec0b8c37798972e@news.eternal-september.org> <itvepc$f6h$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
[This followup was posted to comp.databases and a copy was sent to the cited author.] In article <itvepc$f6h$1@speranza.aioe.org>, art.ward@noreply.xx says... ... > >> In the hope that this was a homework question, I'll just point out that > >> SQL databases don't have "records" they have rows, and rows are just > > > > Most working database people use the terms > > "rows" and "records" relatively interchangeably. > > True, and as long as they know the difference they can get along fine. > But rows aren't records; think of column stores for example. True, and that's why I said "relatively" interchangeably; you can't ALWAYS use them interchangeably. > > > Everybody understands > > what you mean either way. > > Most people who already know the difference get away with it either way. Yep > > > The rest of your (snipped) post is qute a > > good explanation, though rather abstract in its wording. > > Abstraction is good. Programmmers pursue it relentlessly, for good > reason. It's often good for programming though sometimes it can be taken too far, but not so much for person-to-person communication in many cases.
Back to comp.databases | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
joining tables and the order changes shawrie <tourerukcom@googlemail.com> - 2011-06-22 07:44 -0700
Re: joining tables and the order changes Ben Finney <bignose+hates-spam@benfinney.id.au> - 2011-06-23 07:47 +1000
Re: joining tables and the order changes Arthur Ward <art.ward@noreply.xx> - 2011-06-23 08:50 +0000
Re: joining tables and the order changes David Kerber <dkerber@WarrenRogersAssociates.invalid> - 2011-06-23 09:09 -0400
Re: joining tables and the order changes Arthur Ward <art.ward@noreply.xx> - 2011-06-23 13:23 +0000
Re: joining tables and the order changes David Kerber <dkerber@WarrenRogersAssociates.invalid> - 2011-06-23 14:35 -0400
Re: joining tables and the order changes toledobythesea@yahoo.ca - 2011-06-24 10:40 -0700
Re: joining tables and the order changes Arthur Ward <art.ward@noreply.xx> - 2011-06-25 12:33 +0000
Re: joining tables and the order changes paul c <toledobythesea@yahoo.ca> - 2011-06-25 14:44 -0700
Re: joining tables and the order changes paul c <toledobythesea@yahoo.ca> - 2011-06-25 14:53 -0700
Re: joining tables and the order changes Lee Fesperman <firstsql@gmail.com> - 2011-07-04 00:39 -0700
csiph-web