Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.databases.ms-sqlserver > #1998

Alternative to WAITFOR DELAY

Path csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@gmail.com>
Newsgroups comp.databases.ms-sqlserver
Subject Alternative to WAITFOR DELAY
Date Wed, 29 Nov 2017 23:38:36 +0300
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Lines 13
Message-ID <20171129233836.16edaac99510193c72857910@gmail.com> (permalink)
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
Injection-Info reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="85cc17ee4445131a3e1c31a0d6153f8b"; logging-data="994"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19j16fV8ttNF0kiuDtSjQBpPgL3mlZQDXU="
X-Newsreader Sylpheed 3.5.0 (GTK+ 2.24.23; i686-pc-mingw32)
Cancel-Lock sha1:vDghNWwMsrRJLLtL4zEnagjuFRo=
Xref csiph.com comp.databases.ms-sqlserver:1998

Show key headers only | View raw


Hello, all

Is there a more granular way to ease a tight polling
loop in T-SQL than WAITFOR DEALAY?  A delay of  3.33
milliseconds being a tad too long for my purposes, I
seek a way to implement delays of about half a  mil-
lisecond or shorter.  I do not need the precision of
real-time systems and will accept  any  solution  to
prevent a fast WHILE 1=1 loop from hogging the CPU.

-- 
()  ascii ribbon campaign -- against html e-mail
/\  http://preview.tinyurl.com/qcy6mjc [archived]

Back to comp.databases.ms-sqlserver | Previous | NextNext in thread | Find similar


Thread

Alternative to WAITFOR DELAY Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@gmail.com> - 2017-11-29 23:38 +0300
  Re: Alternative to WAITFOR DELAY Erland Sommarskog <esquel@sommarskog.se> - 2017-11-29 22:49 +0100
    Re: Alternative to WAITFOR DELAY Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@g{oogle}mail.com> - 2017-11-30 13:58 +0300

csiph-web