Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.databases.ms-sqlserver > #1999
| From | Erland Sommarskog <esquel@sommarskog.se> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.databases.ms-sqlserver |
| Subject | Re: Alternative to WAITFOR DELAY |
| Date | 2017-11-29 22:49 +0100 |
| Organization | Erland Sommarskog |
| Message-ID | <XnsA83CE82FF733BYazorman@127.0.0.1> (permalink) |
| References | <20171129233836.16edaac99510193c72857910@gmail.com> |
Anton Shepelev (anton.txt@gmail.com) writes: > Is there a more granular way to ease a tight polling > loop in T-SQL than WAITFOR DEALAY? A delay of 3.33 > milliseconds being a tad too long for my purposes, I > seek a way to implement delays of about half a mil- > lisecond or shorter. I do not need the precision of > real-time systems and will accept any solution to > prevent a fast WHILE 1=1 loop from hogging the CPU. > I guess that you could write a CLR procedure for the task.
Back to comp.databases.ms-sqlserver | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Alternative to WAITFOR DELAY Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@gmail.com> - 2017-11-29 23:38 +0300
Re: Alternative to WAITFOR DELAY Erland Sommarskog <esquel@sommarskog.se> - 2017-11-29 22:49 +0100
Re: Alternative to WAITFOR DELAY Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@g{oogle}mail.com> - 2017-11-30 13:58 +0300
csiph-web