Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > comp.compilers > #3651
| From | anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.compilers |
| Subject | Re: Paper: PR2: Peephole Raw Pointer Rewriting with LLMs for Translating C to Safer Rust |
| Date | 2025-05-15 07:48 +0000 |
| Organization | Compilers Central |
| Message-ID | <25-05-008@comp.compilers> (permalink) |
| References | <25-05-004@comp.compilers> <25-05-005@comp.compilers> <25-05-006@comp.compilers> <25-05-007@comp.compilers> |
Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> writes: >On 2025-05-14, arnold@freefriends.org <arnold@freefriends.org> wrote: >> [Rust] relies on compiler analysis instead. > >How would it be safe if you could write a Rust program that asks the >user to input a random decimal number, and then uses it an index to >access an array, without any check? I don't know if Rust does it this way, but it could reject a program that does a[i] if it cannot prove that i is an allowed index for a. For your example, a program like this would be rejected: input i print a[i] (using what little I remember from BASIC syntax because I don't know the Rust syntax:-). If you want the compiler to accept it, you could write input i if i < length[a] then print a[i] else print "index out of range" endif - anton -- M. Anton Ertl anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at http://www.complang.tuwien.ac.at/anton/ [I believe that Rust does runtime checks unless it can prove at compile time that they're not needed. It has a fancy exception system to catch access violations. -John]
Back to comp.compilers | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Paper: PR2: Peephole Raw Pointer Rewriting with LLMs for Translating C to Safer Rust John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2025-05-09 12:27 -0400
Re: Paper: PR2: Peephole Raw Pointer Rewriting with LLMs for Translating C to Safer Rust Derek <derek-nospam@shape-of-code.com> - 2025-05-13 21:30 +0100
Re: Paper: PR2: Peephole Raw Pointer Rewriting with LLMs for Translating C to Safer Rust arnold@freefriends.org - 2025-05-14 08:21 +0000
Re: Paper: PR2: Peephole Raw Pointer Rewriting with LLMs for Translating C to Safer Rust Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-05-14 20:01 +0000
Re: Paper: PR2: Peephole Raw Pointer Rewriting with LLMs for Translating C to Safer Rust anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at - 2025-05-15 07:48 +0000
Re: Paper: PR2: Peephole Raw Pointer Rewriting with LLMs for Translating C to Safer Rust George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> - 2025-05-15 11:52 -0400
Re: Paper: PR2: Peephole Raw Pointer Rewriting with LLMs for Translating C to Safer Rust cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net - 2025-05-16 15:42 +0000
Re: Paper: PR2: Peephole Raw Pointer Rewriting with LLMs for Translating C to Safer Rust Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-05-16 17:57 +0000
csiph-web