Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register


Groups > comp.compilers > #3649

Re: Paper: PR2: Peephole Raw Pointer Rewriting with LLMs for Translating C to Safer Rust

Path csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.iecc.com!.POSTED.news.iecc.com!nerds-end
From arnold@freefriends.org
Newsgroups comp.compilers
Subject Re: Paper: PR2: Peephole Raw Pointer Rewriting with LLMs for Translating C to Safer Rust
Date Wed, 14 May 2025 08:21:51 +0000
Organization Compilers Central
Sender johnl%iecc.com
Approved comp.compilers@iecc.com
Message-ID <25-05-006@comp.compilers> (permalink)
References <25-05-004@comp.compilers> <25-05-005@comp.compilers>
MIME-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Injection-Info gal.iecc.com; posting-host="news.iecc.com:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:676f:7373:6970"; logging-data="90205"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@iecc.com"
Keywords Rust
Posted-Date 14 May 2025 14:13:00 EDT
X-submission-address compilers@iecc.com
X-moderator-address compilers-request@iecc.com
X-FAQ-and-archives http://compilers.iecc.com
Xref csiph.com comp.compilers:3649

Show key headers only | View raw


In article <25-05-005@comp.compilers>,
Derek  <derek-nospam@shape-of-code.com> wrote:
>I suspect that the same is happening with Rust. If so, how does using
>Rust make the code safer than using C without any checking switched
>on?

Rust catches many problems at compile time.  I am not at all a Rust
expert, or even a novice, but I don't think Rust does runtime
bounds checking, since it relies on compiler analysis instead.

Back to comp.compilers | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

Paper: PR2: Peephole Raw Pointer Rewriting with LLMs for Translating C to Safer Rust John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com> - 2025-05-09 12:27 -0400
  Re: Paper: PR2: Peephole Raw Pointer Rewriting with LLMs for Translating C to Safer Rust Derek <derek-nospam@shape-of-code.com> - 2025-05-13 21:30 +0100
    Re: Paper: PR2: Peephole Raw Pointer Rewriting with LLMs for Translating C to Safer Rust arnold@freefriends.org - 2025-05-14 08:21 +0000
      Re: Paper: PR2: Peephole Raw Pointer Rewriting with LLMs for Translating C to Safer Rust Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-05-14 20:01 +0000
        Re: Paper: PR2: Peephole Raw Pointer Rewriting with LLMs for Translating C to Safer Rust anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at - 2025-05-15 07:48 +0000
      Re: Paper: PR2: Peephole Raw Pointer Rewriting with LLMs for Translating C to Safer Rust George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> - 2025-05-15 11:52 -0400
      Re: Paper: PR2: Peephole Raw Pointer Rewriting with LLMs for Translating C to Safer Rust cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net - 2025-05-16 15:42 +0000
        Re: Paper: PR2: Peephole Raw Pointer Rewriting with LLMs for Translating C to Safer Rust Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-05-16 17:57 +0000

csiph-web