Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.compilers > #3182
| From | gah4 <gah4@u.washington.edu> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.compilers |
| Subject | Re: PALM challenge |
| Date | 2022-10-01 17:09 -0700 |
| Organization | Compilers Central |
| Message-ID | <22-10-005@comp.compilers> (permalink) |
| References | <22-10-001@comp.compilers> |
On Saturday, October 1, 2022 at 12:16:25 PM UTC-7, lewi...@gmail.com wrote: > Lots of new CPUs, sure. > But let's explore an old CPU: the 1975 PALM. > I'm looking for anyone interested to explore the idea. Maybe prove how > robust modern tools are at adapting C, by exploring this ancient instruction > set. My favorite for adapting C to new (or old) hardware is LCC. You only have to rewrite the code generator, and it has a code generator generator to make it easier. The usual case, as with many Unix C compilers, is to write out assembly code, and feed it to an assembler. Since you already have an assembler, it should be pretty fast.
Back to comp.compilers | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
PALM challenge Steve Lewis <lewissa78@gmail.com> - 2022-10-01 01:24 -0700
Re: PALM challenge gah4 <gah4@u.washington.edu> - 2022-10-01 17:09 -0700
Re: PALM challenge Thomas Koenig <tkoenig@netcologne.de> - 2022-10-02 20:13 +0000
Re: PALM challenge gah4 <gah4@u.washington.edu> - 2022-10-03 04:37 -0700
csiph-web