Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.compilers > #2052
| Path | csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.iecc.com!.POSTED.news.iecc.com!nerds-end |
|---|---|
| From | Gene Wirchenko <genew@telus.net> |
| Newsgroups | comp.compilers |
| Subject | Re: Language standards vs. implementation, was Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format |
| Date | Tue, 10 Apr 2018 11:07:46 -0700 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Lines | 15 |
| Sender | news@iecc.com |
| Approved | comp.compilers@iecc.com |
| Message-ID | <18-04-033@comp.compilers> (permalink) |
| References | <0d4dc7f8-1819-43e5-8082-6ff7aee5f41b@googlegroups.com> <p9l0cs$p2r$1@gioia.aioe.org> <p9l9bs$am7$1@dont-email.me> <p9ldok$1h9j$1@gioia.aioe.org> <p9li4d$4mn$1@dont-email.me> <p9lvbt$fn0$1@gioia.aioe.org> <2018Mar31.160556@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> <p9o96c$1r72$1@gioia.aioe.org> <p9ohgc$vdl$1@dont-email.me> <2018Mar31.195714@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> <kfnzi2mkjos.fsf@x-alumni2.alumni.caltech.edu> <18-04-018@comp.compilers> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 8bit |
| Injection-Info | gal.iecc.com; posting-host="news.iecc.com:2001:470:1f07:1126:0:676f:7373:6970"; logging-data="60526"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@iecc.com" |
| Keywords | optimize, question |
| Posted-Date | 11 Apr 2018 13:21:28 EDT |
| X-submission-address | compilers@iecc.com |
| X-moderator-address | compilers-request@iecc.com |
| X-FAQ-and-archives | http://compilers.iecc.com |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.compilers:2052 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On Tue, 10 Apr 2018 11:07:44 -0400 (EDT), "Walter Banks"
<walter@bytecraft.com> wrote:
[snip]
>This can be especially true while developing optimization a surprising
>number of new optimizations do not have the intended effect on old
>functioning programs.
I am a compiler non-expert. Could you give some non-trivial
examples (or point to some), please?
Sincerely,
Gene Wirchenko
Back to comp.compilers | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Language standards vs. implementation, was Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format "Walter Banks" <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2018-04-10 11:07 -0400
Re: Language standards vs. implementation, was Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Gene Wirchenko <genew@telus.net> - 2018-04-10 11:07 -0700
Re: Language standards vs. implementation, was Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Martin Ward <martin@gkc.org.uk> - 2018-04-12 09:52 +0100
Re: Language standards vs. implementation, was Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format albert@cherry.spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2018-05-05 20:28 +0200
csiph-web