Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.compilers > #2052
| From | Gene Wirchenko <genew@telus.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.compilers |
| Subject | Re: Language standards vs. implementation, was Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format |
| Date | 2018-04-10 11:07 -0700 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <18-04-033@comp.compilers> (permalink) |
| References | (7 earlier) <p9o96c$1r72$1@gioia.aioe.org> <p9ohgc$vdl$1@dont-email.me> <2018Mar31.195714@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> <kfnzi2mkjos.fsf@x-alumni2.alumni.caltech.edu> <18-04-018@comp.compilers> |
On Tue, 10 Apr 2018 11:07:44 -0400 (EDT), "Walter Banks"
<walter@bytecraft.com> wrote:
[snip]
>This can be especially true while developing optimization a surprising
>number of new optimizations do not have the intended effect on old
>functioning programs.
I am a compiler non-expert. Could you give some non-trivial
examples (or point to some), please?
Sincerely,
Gene Wirchenko
Back to comp.compilers | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Language standards vs. implementation, was Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format "Walter Banks" <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2018-04-10 11:07 -0400
Re: Language standards vs. implementation, was Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Gene Wirchenko <genew@telus.net> - 2018-04-10 11:07 -0700
Re: Language standards vs. implementation, was Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format Martin Ward <martin@gkc.org.uk> - 2018-04-12 09:52 +0100
Re: Language standards vs. implementation, was Re: A right alternative to IEEE-754's format albert@cherry.spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2018-05-05 20:28 +0200
csiph-web