Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > aus.computers > #61652 > unrolled thread

They got me in now this

Back to article view | Back to aus.computers

Contents

  They got me in now this FMurtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-10-24 12:54 +1100
    Re: They got me in now this Pete <pjetson@yahoo.com> - 2017-10-24 16:22 +1100
      Re: They got me in now this FMurtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-10-24 17:57 +1100
    Re: They got me in now this "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-10-24 20:05 +1100
      Re: They got me in now this FMurtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-10-25 14:38 +1100
        Re: They got me in now this "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-10-26 09:07 +1100
          Re: They got me in now this FMurtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-10-26 13:57 +1100
            Re: They got me in now this "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-10-26 17:26 +1100
              Re: They got me in now this F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-10-26 19:17 +1100
                Re: They got me in now this "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-10-27 02:36 +1100
                  Re: They got me in now this F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-10-27 20:26 +1100
                    Re: They got me in now this "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-10-28 14:58 +1100
                      Re: They got me in now this F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-10-28 19:56 +1100
                Re: They got me in now this not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2017-10-26 22:09 +0000
                  Re: They got me in now this F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-10-27 20:29 +1100
                    Re: They got me in now this F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-10-27 23:44 +1100
                      Re: They got me in now this not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2017-10-28 02:07 +0000
                        Re: They got me in now this F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-11-01 16:03 +1100
                          Re: They got me in now this FMurtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-11-02 01:35 +1100
                            Re: They got me in now this Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-11-02 07:13 +1100
                              Re: They got me in now this "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-11-02 08:04 +1100
                                Re: They got me in now this Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-11-02 10:16 +1100
                                  Re: They got me in now this "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-11-02 11:48 +1100
                                    Re: They got me in now this Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-11-02 12:27 +1100
                                      Re: They got me in now this "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-11-02 15:01 +1100
                            Re: They got me in now this "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-11-02 07:55 +1100
                              Re: They got me in now this "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-11-02 07:58 +1100
                          Re: They got me in now this not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2017-11-02 22:00 +0000
    Re: They got me in now this felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-10-25 09:52 +1100
      Re: They got me in now this "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-10-25 10:01 +1100
        Re: They got me in now this keithr0 <user@account.invalid> - 2017-11-05 20:24 +1000
          Re: They got me in now this "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-11-06 08:35 +1100
      Re: They got me in now this felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> - 2017-10-25 11:13 +1100
        Re: They got me in now this "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-10-25 14:30 +1100
    Re: They got me in now this Don McKenzie <5V@2.5A> - 2017-11-02 16:01 +1100

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

#61973

"Petzl" <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote in message 
news:rgakvcho22d9684e7j2ode0lvjtc2uujet@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 2 Nov 2017 01:35:31 +1100, FMurtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>F Murtz wrote:
>>> Computer Nerd Kev wrote:
>>>> F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> F Murtz wrote:
>>>>>> Computer Nerd Kev wrote:
>>>>>>> F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So now have to wait for NBN tech,and so no catch up tv for a
>>>>>>>> while,(3 gb
>>>>>>>> on phone wont get me far)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It serves me well enough downloading videos at "phone resolution". 
>>>>>>> It
>>>>>>> would probably do 20-30 1hr shows if you didn't use it for much 
>>>>>>> else.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> I used to wipe out 2gb in a few hours of iview on laptop have not 
>>>>>> tried
>>>>>> on phone.
>>>>> wifi speed from phone wifi hotspot (optus)
>>>>> http://www.speedtest.net/my-result/6741774024
>>>>
>>>> That's plenty quick enough for downloading videos at phone
>>>> resolutions. The laptop probably defaults to a much higher
>>>> resolution than the phone.
>>>>
>>>> I use downloader software/websites which allow you to select
>>>> the resolution you want. "240p" serves me fine for YouTube
>>>> and the like, I haven't tried iView. I usually set a batch
>>>> downloading simultaneously and watch them later.
>>>>
>>> 2.6 gb got chewed up without me doing much at all over three days,
>>> probably downloading facebook crap on the phone with no input from me as
>>> I had not told it not to,so I turned off data.
>>> NBN has still not done anything with the unstable line even though they
>>> said they would before the 30th.
>>
>>Back on the air again but still not up to speed it was, in the 40 odds.
>>http://www.speedtest.net/my-result/6755676551
>
>
> Since you first hooked I suppose more have Copperwire is no good for
> broadband
>
> Here's what Mr Broadband/Murdoch allow me to have

Another lie.

> http://www.speedtest.net/my-result/6756642029

That the result of your 25/5 plan, nothing to do with whats possible.

What is the synch rates shown in the modem ?

> I prefer the picture
> http://www.speedtest.net/result/6756642029.png

speedtest.myrepublic.com.au leaves them both for dead because
the charts give a much better picture of whats happening.
 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#61974

On Thu, 2 Nov 2017 08:04:32 +1100, "Rod Speed"
<rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
>"Petzl" <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote in message 
>news:rgakvcho22d9684e7j2ode0lvjtc2uujet@4ax.com...
>> On Thu, 2 Nov 2017 01:35:31 +1100, FMurtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>F Murtz wrote:
>>>> Computer Nerd Kev wrote:
>>>>> F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> F Murtz wrote:
>>>>>>> Computer Nerd Kev wrote:
>>>>>>>> F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> So now have to wait for NBN tech,and so no catch up tv for a
>>>>>>>>> while,(3 gb
>>>>>>>>> on phone wont get me far)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It serves me well enough downloading videos at "phone resolution". 
>>>>>>>> It
>>>>>>>> would probably do 20-30 1hr shows if you didn't use it for much 
>>>>>>>> else.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I used to wipe out 2gb in a few hours of iview on laptop have not 
>>>>>>> tried
>>>>>>> on phone.
>>>>>> wifi speed from phone wifi hotspot (optus)
>>>>>> http://www.speedtest.net/my-result/6741774024
>>>>>
>>>>> That's plenty quick enough for downloading videos at phone
>>>>> resolutions. The laptop probably defaults to a much higher
>>>>> resolution than the phone.
>>>>>
>>>>> I use downloader software/websites which allow you to select
>>>>> the resolution you want. "240p" serves me fine for YouTube
>>>>> and the like, I haven't tried iView. I usually set a batch
>>>>> downloading simultaneously and watch them later.
>>>>>
>>>> 2.6 gb got chewed up without me doing much at all over three days,
>>>> probably downloading facebook crap on the phone with no input from me as
>>>> I had not told it not to,so I turned off data.
>>>> NBN has still not done anything with the unstable line even though they
>>>> said they would before the 30th.
>>>
>>>Back on the air again but still not up to speed it was, in the 40 odds.
>>>http://www.speedtest.net/my-result/6755676551
>>
>>
>> Since you first hooked I suppose more have Copperwire is no good for
>> broadband
>>
>> Here's what Mr Broadband/Murdoch allow me to have
>
>Another lie.
>
>> http://www.speedtest.net/my-result/6756642029
>
>That the result of your 25/5 plan, nothing to do with whats possible.
>
I'm paying for 100/40

>What is the synch rates shown in the modem ?
>
>> I prefer the picture
>> http://www.speedtest.net/result/6756642029.png
>
>speedtest.myrepublic.com.au leaves them both for dead because
>the charts give a much better picture of whats happening.
> 
OK but you can't save results. I don't see any difference?
-- 
Petzl 
https://www.liverdoctor.com/you-should-always-put-the-toilet-lid-down-when-you-flush/
 You should always put the toilet lid down when you flush

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#61983

"Petzl" <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote in message 
news:u7lkvcde547h4n3kcsbbn2d9i7lpqtf2o5@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 2 Nov 2017 08:04:32 +1100, "Rod Speed"
> <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>"Petzl" <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>news:rgakvcho22d9684e7j2ode0lvjtc2uujet@4ax.com...
>>> On Thu, 2 Nov 2017 01:35:31 +1100, FMurtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>F Murtz wrote:
>>>>> Computer Nerd Kev wrote:
>>>>>> F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> F Murtz wrote:
>>>>>>>> Computer Nerd Kev wrote:
>>>>>>>>> F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> So now have to wait for NBN tech,and so no catch up tv for a
>>>>>>>>>> while,(3 gb
>>>>>>>>>> on phone wont get me far)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> It serves me well enough downloading videos at "phone resolution".
>>>>>>>>> It
>>>>>>>>> would probably do 20-30 1hr shows if you didn't use it for much
>>>>>>>>> else.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I used to wipe out 2gb in a few hours of iview on laptop have not
>>>>>>>> tried
>>>>>>>> on phone.
>>>>>>> wifi speed from phone wifi hotspot (optus)
>>>>>>> http://www.speedtest.net/my-result/6741774024
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That's plenty quick enough for downloading videos at phone
>>>>>> resolutions. The laptop probably defaults to a much higher
>>>>>> resolution than the phone.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I use downloader software/websites which allow you to select
>>>>>> the resolution you want. "240p" serves me fine for YouTube
>>>>>> and the like, I haven't tried iView. I usually set a batch
>>>>>> downloading simultaneously and watch them later.
>>>>>>
>>>>> 2.6 gb got chewed up without me doing much at all over three days,
>>>>> probably downloading facebook crap on the phone with no input from me 
>>>>> as
>>>>> I had not told it not to,so I turned off data.
>>>>> NBN has still not done anything with the unstable line even though 
>>>>> they
>>>>> said they would before the 30th.
>>>>
>>>>Back on the air again but still not up to speed it was, in the 40 odds.
>>>>http://www.speedtest.net/my-result/6755676551
>>>
>>>
>>> Since you first hooked I suppose more have Copperwire is no good for
>>> broadband
>>>
>>> Here's what Mr Broadband/Murdoch allow me to have
>>
>>Another lie.
>>
>>> http://www.speedtest.net/my-result/6756642029
>>
>>That the result of your 25/5 plan, nothing to do with whats possible.

> I'm paying for 100/40

They arent delivering that.

>> What is the synch rates shown in the modem ?

Why didn't you answer this ?

>>> I prefer the picture
>>> http://www.speedtest.net/result/6756642029.png

>> speedtest.myrepublic.com.au leaves them both for dead because
>> the charts give a much better picture of whats happening.

> OK but you can't save results.

Corse you can.

> I don't see any difference?

More fool you. The obvious difference is the charts.

Those who who else on your POI is using their services
heavily. The download chart gets much  more spiky
with a lack of CVC in the POI in peak times. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#61990

On Thu, 2 Nov 2017 11:48:46 +1100, "Rod Speed"
<rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:

>>>> Here's what Mr Broadband/Murdoch allow me to have
>>>
>>>Another lie.
>>>
>>>> http://www.speedtest.net/my-result/6756642029
>>>
>>>That the result of your 25/5 plan, nothing to do with whats possible.
>
>> I'm paying for 100/40
>
>They arent delivering that.
>
>>> What is the synch rates shown in the modem ?
>
>Why didn't you answer this ?
>
>>>> I prefer the picture
>>>> http://www.speedtest.net/result/6756642029.png
>
>>> speedtest.myrepublic.com.au leaves them both for dead because
>>> the charts give a much better picture of whats happening.
>
>> OK but you can't save results.
>
>Corse you can.
>
>> I don't see any difference?
>
>More fool you. The obvious difference is the charts.
>
>Those who who else on your POI is using their services
>heavily. The download chart gets much  more spiky
>with a lack of CVC in the POI in peak times. 

OK Ctrl + Prt SC then paste as image into Paint.Net save
then paste image into Twitter
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DNlxnzeUQAAdY6v.jpg

tells me nothing upload is scratchy
-- 
Petzl 
https://www.liverdoctor.com/you-should-always-put-the-toilet-lid-down-when-you-flush/
 You should always put the toilet lid down when you flush

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#61996

"Petzl" <petzlx@gmail.com> wrote in message 
news:kuskvcpq8269g85fa0ln7s9sosd4b8aknj@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 2 Nov 2017 11:48:46 +1100, "Rod Speed"
> <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>>>> Here's what Mr Broadband/Murdoch allow me to have
>>>>
>>>>Another lie.
>>>>
>>>>> http://www.speedtest.net/my-result/6756642029
>>>>
>>>>That the result of your 25/5 plan, nothing to do with whats possible.
>>
>>> I'm paying for 100/40
>>
>>They arent delivering that.
>>
>>>> What is the synch rates shown in the modem ?
>>
>>Why didn't you answer this ?
>>
>>>>> I prefer the picture
>>>>> http://www.speedtest.net/result/6756642029.png
>>
>>>> speedtest.myrepublic.com.au leaves them both for dead because
>>>> the charts give a much better picture of whats happening.
>>
>>> OK but you can't save results.
>>
>>Corse you can.
>>
>>> I don't see any difference?
>>
>>More fool you. The obvious difference is the charts.
>>
>>Those who who else on your POI is using their services
>>heavily. The download chart gets much  more spiky
>>with a lack of CVC in the POI in peak times.
>
> OK Ctrl + Prt SC then paste as image into Paint.Net save
> then paste image into Twitter
> https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DNlxnzeUQAAdY6v.jpg
>
> tells me nothing

Wrong.

> upload is scratchy

That's very unusual indeed. Usually it's the downloads
that vary, and in peak times not at this time of day. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#61970

"FMurtz" <haggisz@hotmail.com> wrote in message 
news:59f9dbb5$0$13033$b1db1813$814165ff@news.astraweb.com...
> F Murtz wrote:
>> Computer Nerd Kev wrote:
>>> F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>> F Murtz wrote:
>>>>> Computer Nerd Kev wrote:
>>>>>> F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So now have to wait for NBN tech,and so no catch up tv for a
>>>>>>> while,(3 gb
>>>>>>> on phone wont get me far)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It serves me well enough downloading videos at "phone resolution". It
>>>>>> would probably do 20-30 1hr shows if you didn't use it for much else.
>>>>>>
>>>>> I used to wipe out 2gb in a few hours of iview on laptop have not 
>>>>> tried
>>>>> on phone.
>>>> wifi speed from phone wifi hotspot (optus)
>>>> http://www.speedtest.net/my-result/6741774024
>>>
>>> That's plenty quick enough for downloading videos at phone
>>> resolutions. The laptop probably defaults to a much higher
>>> resolution than the phone.
>>>
>>> I use downloader software/websites which allow you to select
>>> the resolution you want. "240p" serves me fine for YouTube
>>> and the like, I haven't tried iView. I usually set a batch
>>> downloading simultaneously and watch them later.
>>>
>> 2.6 gb got chewed up without me doing much at all over three days,
>> probably downloading facebook crap on the phone with no input from me as
>> I had not told it not to,so I turned off data.
>> NBN has still not done anything with the unstable line even though they
>> said they would before the 30th.

> Back on the air again but still not up to speed it was, in the 40 odds.
> http://www.speedtest.net/my-result/6755676551

It was comprehensively fucked even on adsl, presumably the
street cabling is a complete shambles of fucked joints and cabling. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#61971

"Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote in message 
news:f5uqm3FimklU1@mid.individual.net...
>
>
> "FMurtz" <haggisz@hotmail.com> wrote in message 
> news:59f9dbb5$0$13033$b1db1813$814165ff@news.astraweb.com...
>> F Murtz wrote:
>>> Computer Nerd Kev wrote:
>>>> F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> F Murtz wrote:
>>>>>> Computer Nerd Kev wrote:
>>>>>>> F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So now have to wait for NBN tech,and so no catch up tv for a
>>>>>>>> while,(3 gb
>>>>>>>> on phone wont get me far)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> It serves me well enough downloading videos at "phone resolution". 
>>>>>>> It
>>>>>>> would probably do 20-30 1hr shows if you didn't use it for much 
>>>>>>> else.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> I used to wipe out 2gb in a few hours of iview on laptop have not 
>>>>>> tried
>>>>>> on phone.
>>>>> wifi speed from phone wifi hotspot (optus)
>>>>> http://www.speedtest.net/my-result/6741774024
>>>>
>>>> That's plenty quick enough for downloading videos at phone
>>>> resolutions. The laptop probably defaults to a much higher
>>>> resolution than the phone.
>>>>
>>>> I use downloader software/websites which allow you to select
>>>> the resolution you want. "240p" serves me fine for YouTube
>>>> and the like, I haven't tried iView. I usually set a batch
>>>> downloading simultaneously and watch them later.
>>>>
>>> 2.6 gb got chewed up without me doing much at all over three days,
>>> probably downloading facebook crap on the phone with no input from me as
>>> I had not told it not to,so I turned off data.
>>> NBN has still not done anything with the unstable line even though they
>>> said they would before the 30th.
>
>> Back on the air again but still not up to speed it was, in the 40 odds.
>> http://www.speedtest.net/my-result/6755676551
>
> It was comprehensively fucked even on adsl, presumably the
> street cabling is a complete shambles of fucked joints and cabling.

That's with what cabling config inside the house ?

The ratio is still way out, should be 3:1 but its less clear if
that the fucked street cabling or whats inside your house.
 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#62020

F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
> 2.6 gb got chewed up without me doing much at all over three days, 
> probably downloading facebook crap on the phone with no input from me as 
> I had not told it not to,so I turned off data.

Perhaps something decided to update itself.

-- 
__          __
#_ < |\| |< _#

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#61669

On 24/10/2017 12:54 PM, FMurtz wrote:
> They got me in with their fastest speed possible, it is now this.
> It was about 43 down fairly constant once.
> http://www.speedtest.net/my-result/6731880664

Ha ha, sucked in. I knew it sounded too good to be true, too good to 
last. how could they do it when everyone else had to have prices based 
on speed? it was a marketing ploy to get ppl to sign up. and there's 
more bad news. I saw (somewhere) that in early November they will be 
reverting to capped speed plans just like everyone else, which means I 
assume, that unless you are on a contract you will have to choose a new plan

-- 
https://www.coalitionformarriage.com.au/
http://bernardgaynor.com.au/
http://thereligionofpeace.com
https://www.jihadwatch.org

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#61679

felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> wrote
> FMurtz wrote

>> They got me in with their fastest speed possible, it is now this.
>> It was about 43 down fairly constant once.
>> http://www.speedtest.net/my-result/6731880664

> Ha ha, sucked in. I knew it sounded too good to be true, too good to last.

Mine is just as good as it ever was.

> how could they do it when everyone else had to have prices based on speed?

Everyone else doesn’t.

> it was a marketing ploy to get ppl to sign up.

How odd that mine is just as good as it ever was.

> and there's more bad news.

Nope.

> I saw (somewhere) that in early November they will be reverting to capped 
> speed plans

Just because some fool claims something...

> just like everyone else,

Everyone else doesn’t.

> which means I assume, that unless you are on a contract you will have to 
> choose a new plan

More fool you, it doesn’t. And we are on a contract anyway. 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#62055

On 10/25/2017 9:01 AM, Rod Speed wrote:
> felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> wrote
>> FMurtz wrote
> 
>>> They got me in with their fastest speed possible, it is now this.
>>> It was about 43 down fairly constant once.
>>> http://www.speedtest.net/my-result/6731880664
> 
>> Ha ha, sucked in. I knew it sounded too good to be true, too good to 
>> last.
> 
> Mine is just as good as it ever was.
> 
>> how could they do it when everyone else had to have prices based on 
>> speed?
> 
> Everyone else doesn’t.
> 
>> it was a marketing ploy to get ppl to sign up.
> 
> How odd that mine is just as good as it ever was.

That's because nobody else in Griffith was stupid enough to sign up with 
them.

>> and there's more bad news.
> 
> Nope.
> 
>> I saw (somewhere) that in early November they will be reverting to 
>> capped speed plans
> 
> Just because some fool claims something...

Like Rod speed

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#62059

"keithr0" <user@account.invalid> wrote in message 
news:f6876lFqls0U1@mid.individual.net...
> On 10/25/2017 9:01 AM, Rod Speed wrote:
>> felix <felix@real_felix.invalid> wrote
>>> FMurtz wrote
>>
>>>> They got me in with their fastest speed possible, it is now this.
>>>> It was about 43 down fairly constant once.
>>>> http://www.speedtest.net/my-result/6731880664
>>
>>> Ha ha, sucked in. I knew it sounded too good to be true, too good to 
>>> last.
>>
>> Mine is just as good as it ever was.
>>
>>> how could they do it when everyone else had to have prices based on 
>>> speed?
>>
>> Everyone else doesn’t.
>>
>>> it was a marketing ploy to get ppl to sign up.
>>
>> How odd that mine is just as good as it ever was.
>
> That's because nobody else in Griffith was stupid enough to sign up with 
> them.

You're wrong, as always. All but one of my mates has.

And it’s the POI that matters, not the town, you pig ignorant fuckwit pom.

And when the downloads did for a while sag down to 5 at peak times before
they added more CVC, there clearly must have been plenty using them anyway.

>>> and there's more bad news.
>>
>> Nope.
>>
>>> I saw (somewhere) that in early November they will be reverting to 
>>> capped speed plans
>>
>> Just because some fool claims something...
 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#61683

On 25/10/2017 9:52 AM, felix wrote:
> On 24/10/2017 12:54 PM, FMurtz wrote:
>> They got me in with their fastest speed possible, it is now this.
>> It was about 43 down fairly constant once.
>> http://www.speedtest.net/my-result/6731880664
>
> Ha ha, sucked in. I knew it sounded too good to be true, too good to 
> last. how could they do it when everyone else had to have prices based 
> on speed? it was a marketing ploy to get ppl to sign up. and there's 
> more bad news. I saw (somewhere) that in early November they will be 
> reverting to capped speed plans just like everyone else, which means I 
> assume, that unless you are on a contract you will have to choose a 
> new plan
>

read about MR's fantastic customer experience, lol .. 
https://www.productreview.com.au/p/my-republic.html

and I heartily concur with the 2 star overall rating from my own experience



-- 
https://www.coalitionformarriage.com.au/
http://bernardgaynor.com.au/
http://thereligionofpeace.com
https://www.jihadwatch.org

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#61685

"felix" <felix@real_felix.invalid> wrote in message 
news:f59vnrFo1tsU1@mid.individual.net...
> On 25/10/2017 9:52 AM, felix wrote:
>> On 24/10/2017 12:54 PM, FMurtz wrote:
>>> They got me in with their fastest speed possible, it is now this.
>>> It was about 43 down fairly constant once.
>>> http://www.speedtest.net/my-result/6731880664
>>
>> Ha ha, sucked in. I knew it sounded too good to be true, too good to 
>> last. how could they do it when everyone else had to have prices based on 
>> speed? it was a marketing ploy to get ppl to sign up. and there's more 
>> bad news. I saw (somewhere) that in early November they will be reverting 
>> to capped speed plans just like everyone else, which means I assume, that 
>> unless you are on a contract you will have to choose a new plan
>>
>
> read about MR's fantastic customer experience, lol .. 
> https://www.productreview.com.au/p/my-republic.html

Now try reading the bank reviews. That steaming turd
of a sight has terminal fuckwits doing the reviews.

> and I heartily concur with the 2 star overall rating from my own 
> experience
 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#61998

On 24/10/2017 12:54 PM, FMurtz wrote:
> They got me in with their fastest speed possible, it is now this.
> It was about 43 down fairly constant once.
> http://www.speedtest.net/my-result/6731880664

http://beta.speedtest.net/result/6757534237

10ms, 80Mbps download, 35Mbps upload. 16:00-ish Thursday.

Not too shabby. That's on WiFi. Is a little faster (cracked 90Mbps) on direct cable, but not set up at the moment. 
Notebooks these days don't support RJ-45s.

That's on Optus NBN, all the way with fiber optic cable, and paying the top tier.

Pity I retired. So many years of dial up, and slow connections. Now I don't need fast, I have fast.

Cheers Don...



-- 
Don McKenzie

https://www.shop-dontronics.com

All Olimex products now 75% to 95% off normal Olimex Prices.
https://www.shop-dontronics.com/olimex-discounts
Many other items discounted up to 95% off.
Also discounts on CCS, SimmStick, etc.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]

Back to top | Article view | aus.computers

csiph-web