Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > aus.computers > #58032 > unrolled thread
| Started by | dieseldamo@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| First post | 2017-01-30 04:33 -0800 |
| Last post | 2017-02-02 07:28 +1100 |
| Articles | 7 on this page of 27 — 6 participants |
Back to article view | Back to aus.computers
Civilised Society - according to Felix dieseldamo@gmail.com - 2017-01-30 04:33 -0800
Re: Civilised Society - according to Felix Jeßus <j@j.net> - 2017-01-31 05:52 +1100
Re: Civilised Society - according to Felix "Blue Peeler" <woof@barque.org> - 2017-01-30 20:13 +0000
Re: Civilised Society - according to Felix Jeßus <j@j.net> - 2017-01-31 07:42 +1100
Re: Civilised Society - according to Felix felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2017-01-31 10:01 +1100
Re: Civilised Society - according to Felix Jeßus <j@j.net> - 2017-01-31 10:23 +1100
Re: Civilised Society - according to Felix dieseldamo@gmail.com - 2017-01-30 23:12 -0800
Re: Civilised Society - according to Felix felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2017-01-31 19:41 +1100
Re: Civilised Society - according to Felix Jeßus <j@j.net> - 2017-01-31 19:54 +1100
Re: Civilised Society - according to Felix Noddy <me@home.com> - 2017-01-31 22:30 +1100
Re: Civilised Society - according to Felix Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2017-01-31 22:42 +1100
Re: Civilised Society - according to Felix felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2017-02-01 10:13 +1100
Re: Civilised Society - according to Felix Noddy <me@home.com> - 2017-02-01 13:16 +1100
Re: Civilised Society - according to Felix felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2017-02-01 15:30 +1100
Re: Civilised Society - according to Felix Noddy <me@home.com> - 2017-02-01 15:37 +1100
Re: Civilised Society - according to Felix felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2017-02-01 16:08 +1100
Re: Civilised Society - according to Felix Noddy <me@home.com> - 2017-02-01 16:13 +1100
Re: Civilised Society - according to Felix felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2017-02-01 16:36 +1100
Re: Civilised Society - according to Felix Noddy <me@home.com> - 2017-02-01 16:57 +1100
Re: Civilised Society - according to Felix Jeßus <j@j.net> - 2017-02-02 07:30 +1100
Re: Civilised Society - according to Felix Jeßus <j@j.net> - 2017-02-01 05:32 +1100
Re: Civilised Society - according to Felix dieseldamo@gmail.com - 2017-01-31 01:53 -0800
Re: Civilised Society - according to Felix felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2017-02-01 10:15 +1100
Re: Civilised Society - according to Felix Noddy <me@home.com> - 2017-02-01 12:14 +1100
Re: Civilised Society - according to Felix felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2017-02-01 12:58 +1100
Re: Civilised Society - according to Felix Noddy <me@home.com> - 2017-02-01 13:31 +1100
Re: Civilised Society - according to Felix Jeßus <j@j.net> - 2017-02-02 07:28 +1100
Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]
| From | Jeßus <j@j.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-01 05:32 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <s0m19c9thvp99d8l44nn7b547ld8tp243b@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #58141 |
On Tue, 31 Jan 2017 22:30:06 +1100, Noddy <me@home.com> wrote: >On 31/01/17 7:54 PM, Je?us wrote: > >>> "No regard, like >>> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/aus.cars/iHfspAhUXKU/HoEc20KBDgAJ: >>> "more like if he's bleeding to death on a West Australian beach >>> following a shark attack, and begging me to dial 000, I'll just stand >>> idly by, continue to eat my Maccas fries, and watch the blood oozing out" >>> >>> like anyone with any sense ever thought that was a serious remark >> >> Is that your latest defence, that it wasn't a serious remark? >> >> So... >> >> fucked tyres >> No need to replace timing belts >> Monster cables are 'industry standard' >> Old Holdens doing 90MPH in 2nd gear >> Different DVDRs and HDMI cables produce a different picture quality... >> >> Oh, like anyone with any sense ever thought they were a serious >> remark? > >No hope of winning a bet with someone who shifts goalposts as much as >this, huh? :) No, not a lot :)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | dieseldamo@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-01-31 01:53 -0800 |
| Message-ID | <5861e585-6199-47ea-8b12-8f1ab66237f3@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #58102 |
On Tuesday, January 31, 2017 at 7:41:35 PM UTC+11, felix wrote: > On Tuesday, 31 Jan 2017 6:12 PM, dieseldamo@gmail.com wrote: > > > > If you want to call answering a request an "obsession", then you might > > find you're just narcissistic. > > Oh you wanted a reply did you? my bad! but I thought you wouldn't > want me to embarrass you by addressing your nonsense. nevertheless.. So you ask for something, run away with your tail between your legs, I manage to give it to you anyway, and I'm guilty of nonsense? The confused little circles you run around in are getting tighter and tighter. > > "No regard, like travelling in the overtaking lane because no-one > "should" need to go faster than you. " > > never said I did. try proving otherwise You did say no-one should need to go any faster. I could prove it with a link, but you're going to run away again, aren't you? Then it'll be "nonsense" again when I do put it right in front of your face, and your favourite conclusion, "Everyone can't stop talking about meee! Yaaaay!" > > "No regard, like not stopping at an accident scene to at least see if > it's serious enough for a 000 call" > > an accident I wasn't involved in That's the whole point you complete retard. It's what a civilised person would do. > so that's it then? that's all you have? No Felix, there are reams and reams of your hypocritical shit that I could post, but you just run away when you ask for proof and it gets shown to you. So judging by your overall reply here, whenever you're caught lying, being hypocritical, and just plain wrong, I should assume you're not being serious. Righty-o then. I'll just consider you a permanent clown then.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | felix <me@nothere.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-01 10:15 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <efck5cFc9ouU4@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #58114 |
On Tuesday, 31 Jan 2017 8:53 PM, dieseldamo@gmail.com wrote: > On Tuesday, January 31, 2017 at 7:41:35 PM UTC+11, felix wrote: >> On Tuesday, 31 Jan 2017 6:12 PM, dieseldamo@gmail.com wrote: >>> If you want to call answering a request an "obsession", then you might >>> find you're just narcissistic. >> Oh you wanted a reply did you? my bad! but I thought you wouldn't >> want me to embarrass you by addressing your nonsense. nevertheless.. > So you ask for something, run away with your tail between your legs, you see, this is why I ignore you (and others). because you pretend you want to discuss, but all you really want to do is talk about me, find fault, and criticise me, as if that somehow proves something. well I have news for you, no one in this world is perfect, and I don't even try to be, or want to be. so you will always find something to be critical about. but you and the rest of the mob are too stupid to understand that by not replying I may not be 'running away', as you put it, because I'm afraid to confront you, or have no answers, or whatever, it's simply disinterest! and if you had more sense you could appreciate and understand this. but I'll persist and deal with your nonsense anyway... > I manage to give it to you anyway, and I'm guilty of nonsense? > > The confused little circles you run around in are getting tighter > and tighter. > >> "No regard, like travelling in the overtaking lane because no-one >> "should" need to go faster than you." >> >> never said I did. try proving otherwise > You did say no-one should need to go any faster. I could prove it > with a link, but you're going to run away again, aren't you? no stupid not this time, I'm taking you on. what I said was, if someone is traveling at the speed limit in the right lane, then no one should be trying to pass them, as they would be breaking the law. nothing about any sort of justification for doing so, like a husband driving his pregnant wife to hospital because she's in labour, emergency vehicles, or any other reason, and certainly nothing about what I would do. in fact I prefer to travel in the left or center lanes. next.. > Then > it'll be "nonsense" again when I do put it right in front of your > face, and your favourite conclusion, "Everyone can't stop talking > about meee! Yaaaay!" > >> "No regard, like not stopping at an accident scene to at least see if >> it's serious enough for a 000 call" >> >> an accident I wasn't involved in > That's the whole point you complete retard. It's what a civilised > person would do. not every 'civilized person' stops at an accident they weren't involved in, in fact most would not, just drive by rubber necking. next.. oh, there is no next. so you accept my arguments as follows then.. "No regard, like https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/aus.cars/iHfspAhUXKU/HoEc20KBDgAJ: "more like if he's bleeding to death on a West Australian beach following a shark attack, and begging me to dial 000, I'll just stand idly by, continue to eat my Maccas fries, and watch the blood oozing out" like anyone with any sense ever thought that was a serious remark "No regard, like hoping someone dies while using their tractor because you're jealous of the tractor." jealous of a tractor!? 'shirley, you kant be serious!' forgot your meds today, did you "Yep, Felix The Barbarian. ISIS are more civilised than you." that's so ridiculous it doesn't even merit a reply ............. so that would be three to me and zero to you. plus the one answered here, which I doubt you can dispute, will make four to none. and if my arithmetic is correct, that would be all your points shot down in flames. > >> so that's it then? that's all you have? > No Felix, there are reams and reams of your hypocritical shit that > I could post, but you just run away when you ask for proof and it > gets shown to you. > > So judging by your overall reply here, whenever you're caught lying, > being hypocritical, and just plain wrong, I should assume you're > not being serious. Righty-o then. I'll just consider you a permanent > clown then. you may assume and consider whatever you wish, it means nothing because only facts matter in establishing truth. -- "Never argue with a fool. They will drag you to their level and beat you with experience"
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Noddy <me@home.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-01 12:14 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <o6rcla$cv4$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #58188 |
On 01/02/17 10:15 AM, felix wrote: >>> Oh you wanted a reply did you? my bad! but I thought you wouldn't >>> want me to embarrass you by addressing your nonsense. nevertheless.. >> So you ask for something, run away with your tail between your legs, > > > you see, this is why I ignore you (and others). because you pretend you > want to discuss, but all you really want to do is talk about me, find > fault, and criticise me, as if that somehow proves something. Felix, your "killfiling" of people is a load of bullshit. I give you more shit than anyone, and you steadfastly *refuse* to plonk me even when I ask you to. If you finally get the courage to do so, I'd be lucky to stay in there for a week because you can't bear to miss out on someone mentioning your name. You're as much of a narcissistic attention whore as your fucked up troll mate Krypsis, which is no doubt why the two of you mongoloid retards are drawn to each other like flies to shit. -- -- -- Regards, Noddy.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | felix <me@nothere.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-01 12:58 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <efctlkFe0cpU1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #58206 |
On Wednesday, 1 Feb 2017 12:14 PM, Noddy wrote: > On 01/02/17 10:15 AM, felix wrote: > >>>> Oh you wanted a reply did you? my bad! but I thought you wouldn't >>>> want me to embarrass you by addressing your nonsense. nevertheless.. >>> So you ask for something, run away with your tail between your legs, >> >> >> you see, this is why I ignore you (and others). because you pretend you >> want to discuss, but all you really want to do is talk about me, find >> fault, and criticise me, as if that somehow proves something. > > Felix, your "killfiling" of people is a load of bullshit. I give you > more shit than anyone, actually you haven't been so much lately, which is why I've deigned to answer some of your posts :) besides, 'we' all know that any lack of response on my part would never stop you talking about me, would it > and you steadfastly *refuse* to plonk me even when I ask you to. you are killfiled in aus.cars. not my fault that you have chosen to pollute aus.computers, aus.legal, and aus.politics with your drivel -- "Never argue with a fool. They will drag you to their level and beat you with experience"
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Noddy <me@home.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-01 13:31 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <o6rh5h$e81$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #58216 |
On 01/02/17 12:58 PM, felix wrote: >> Felix, your "killfiling" of people is a load of bullshit. I give you >> more shit than anyone, > > actually you haven't been so much lately, which is why I've deigned to > answer some of your posts :) You need to get over yourself and appreciate that people are free to talk about whomever or whatever they like, and if you genuinely *don't* like being the topic of conversation then either stop being a fuckwit and giving people the ammunition, or *fuck off* to somewhere where no one knows you. Either way, this is *your* problem. Not anyone else's. -- -- Regards, Noddy.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jeßus <j@j.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2017-02-02 07:28 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <33h49cdtfsdr7habjfqchhcf20fna90qnm@4ax.com> |
| In reply to | #58216 |
On Wed, 1 Feb 2017 12:58:08 +1100, felix (AKA Peter Wood) <me@nothere.invalid> wrote: >On Wednesday, 1 Feb 2017 12:14 PM, Noddy wrote: >> On 01/02/17 10:15 AM, felix wrote: >> >>>>> Oh you wanted a reply did you? my bad! but I thought you wouldn't >>>>> want me to embarrass you by addressing your nonsense. nevertheless.. >>>> So you ask for something, run away with your tail between your legs, >>> >>> >>> you see, this is why I ignore you (and others). because you pretend you >>> want to discuss, but all you really want to do is talk about me, find >>> fault, and criticise me, as if that somehow proves something. >> >> Felix, your "killfiling" of people is a load of bullshit. I give you >> more shit than anyone, > >actually you haven't been so much lately, which is why I've deigned to >answer some of your posts :) > >besides, 'we' all know that any lack of response on my part would never >stop you talking about me, would it > >> and you steadfastly *refuse* to plonk me even when I ask you to. > >you are killfiled in aus.cars. not my fault that you have chosen to >pollute aus.computers, aus.legal, and aus.politics with your drivel What kind of logic is that? Killfiled in one group, but not in any other... on top of that, you still somehow feel compelled to read Noddy's posts. LOL. You really are an imbecile.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 2 of 2 — ← Prev page 1 [2]
Back to top | Article view | aus.computers
csiph-web