Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > aus.computers > #58188

Re: Civilised Society - according to Felix

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On Tuesday, 31 Jan 2017 8:53 PM, dieseldamo@gmail.com wrote:
> On Tuesday, January 31, 2017 at 7:41:35 PM UTC+11, felix wrote:
>> On Tuesday, 31 Jan 2017 6:12 PM, dieseldamo@gmail.com wrote:
>>> If you want to call answering a request an "obsession", then you might
>>> find you're just narcissistic.
>> Oh you wanted a reply did you? my bad! but I thought you wouldn't
>> want me to embarrass you by addressing your nonsense. nevertheless..
> So you ask for something, run away with your tail between your legs,


you see, this is why I ignore you (and others). because you pretend you 
want to discuss, but all you really want to do is talk about me, find 
fault, and criticise me, as if that somehow proves something. well I 
have news for you, no one in this world is perfect, and I don't even try 
to be, or want to be. so you will always find something to be critical 
about. but you and the rest of the mob are too stupid to understand that 
by not replying I may not be 'running away', as  you put it, because I'm 
afraid to confront you, or have no answers, or whatever, it's simply 
disinterest! and if you had more sense you could appreciate and 
understand this. but I'll persist and deal with your nonsense anyway...


> I manage to give it to you anyway, and I'm guilty of nonsense?
>
> The confused little circles you run around in are getting tighter
> and tighter.
>
>> "No regard, like travelling in the overtaking lane because no-one
>> "should" need to go faster than you."
>>
>> never said I did. try proving otherwise
> You did say no-one should need to go any faster. I could prove it
> with a link, but you're going to run away again, aren't you?

no stupid not this time, I'm taking you on. what I said was, if someone 
is traveling at the speed limit in the right lane, then no one should be 
trying to pass them, as they would be breaking the law. nothing about 
any sort of justification for doing so, like a husband driving his 
pregnant wife to hospital because she's in labour, emergency vehicles, 
or any other reason, and certainly nothing about what I would do. in 
fact I prefer to travel in the left or center lanes.

next..

> Then
> it'll be "nonsense" again when I do put it right in front of your
> face, and your favourite conclusion, "Everyone can't stop talking
> about meee! Yaaaay!"
>
>> "No regard, like not stopping at an accident scene to at least see if
>> it's serious enough for a 000 call"
>>
>> an accident I wasn't involved in
> That's the whole point you complete retard. It's what a civilised
> person would do.

not every 'civilized person' stops at an accident they weren't involved 
in, in fact most would not, just drive by rubber necking.

next..

oh, there is no next. so you accept my arguments as follows then..

"No regard, like 
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/aus.cars/iHfspAhUXKU/HoEc20KBDgAJ: 
"more like if he's bleeding to death on a West Australian beach 
following a shark attack, and begging me to dial 000, I'll just stand 
idly by, continue to eat my Maccas fries, and watch the blood oozing out"

like anyone with any sense ever thought that was a serious remark

"No regard, like hoping someone dies while using their tractor because 
you're jealous of the tractor."

jealous of a tractor!? 'shirley, you kant be serious!' forgot your meds 
today, did you

"Yep, Felix The Barbarian. ISIS are more civilised than you."

that's so ridiculous it doesn't even merit a reply

.............

so that would be three to me and zero to you. plus the one answered 
here, which I doubt you can dispute, will make four to none. and if my 
arithmetic is correct, that would be all your points shot down in flames.


>
>> so that's it then? that's all you have?
> No Felix, there are reams and reams of your hypocritical shit that
> I could post, but you just run away when you ask for proof and it
> gets shown to you.
>
> So judging by your overall reply here, whenever you're caught lying,
> being hypocritical, and just plain wrong, I should assume you're
> not being serious. Righty-o then. I'll just consider you a permanent
> clown then.

you may assume and consider whatever you wish, it means nothing because 
only facts matter in establishing truth.


-- 
"Never argue with a fool. They will drag you
to their level and beat you with experience"

Back to aus.computers | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Civilised Society - according to Felix dieseldamo@gmail.com - 2017-01-30 04:33 -0800
  Re: Civilised Society - according to Felix Jeßus <j@j.net> - 2017-01-31 05:52 +1100
    Re: Civilised Society - according to Felix "Blue Peeler" <woof@barque.org> - 2017-01-30 20:13 +0000
      Re: Civilised Society - according to Felix Jeßus <j@j.net> - 2017-01-31 07:42 +1100
  Re: Civilised Society - according to Felix felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2017-01-31 10:01 +1100
    Re: Civilised Society - according to Felix Jeßus <j@j.net> - 2017-01-31 10:23 +1100
    Re: Civilised Society - according to Felix dieseldamo@gmail.com - 2017-01-30 23:12 -0800
      Re: Civilised Society - according to Felix felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2017-01-31 19:41 +1100
        Re: Civilised Society - according to Felix Jeßus <j@j.net> - 2017-01-31 19:54 +1100
          Re: Civilised Society - according to Felix Noddy <me@home.com> - 2017-01-31 22:30 +1100
            Re: Civilised Society - according to Felix Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2017-01-31 22:42 +1100
              Re: Civilised Society - according to Felix felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2017-02-01 10:13 +1100
                Re: Civilised Society - according to Felix Noddy <me@home.com> - 2017-02-01 13:16 +1100
                Re: Civilised Society - according to Felix felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2017-02-01 15:30 +1100
                Re: Civilised Society - according to Felix Noddy <me@home.com> - 2017-02-01 15:37 +1100
                Re: Civilised Society - according to Felix felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2017-02-01 16:08 +1100
                Re: Civilised Society - according to Felix Noddy <me@home.com> - 2017-02-01 16:13 +1100
                Re: Civilised Society - according to Felix felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2017-02-01 16:36 +1100
                Re: Civilised Society - according to Felix Noddy <me@home.com> - 2017-02-01 16:57 +1100
                Re: Civilised Society - according to Felix Jeßus <j@j.net> - 2017-02-02 07:30 +1100
            Re: Civilised Society - according to Felix Jeßus <j@j.net> - 2017-02-01 05:32 +1100
        Re: Civilised Society - according to Felix dieseldamo@gmail.com - 2017-01-31 01:53 -0800
          Re: Civilised Society - according to Felix felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2017-02-01 10:15 +1100
            Re: Civilised Society - according to Felix Noddy <me@home.com> - 2017-02-01 12:14 +1100
              Re: Civilised Society - according to Felix felix <me@nothere.invalid> - 2017-02-01 12:58 +1100
                Re: Civilised Society - according to Felix Noddy <me@home.com> - 2017-02-01 13:31 +1100
                Re: Civilised Society - according to Felix Jeßus <j@j.net> - 2017-02-02 07:28 +1100

csiph-web