Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > aus.computers > #59156
| From | "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | aus.computers |
| Subject | Re: WikiLeaks |
| Date | 2017-03-10 20:22 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <eif9j8F7p98U1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <o9rpi2$1qf5$1@gioia.aioe.org> <cch3ccho4e94k69b7r9pu1k38qol3a8bjc@j.net> <eiei3oF3ionU1@mid.individual.net> <jae4cc1jfebtrma539k5lnn2mmbu3nl7fp@4ax.com> <1lg4ccd7f7rp0eoi0co8bs57vplpo265n2@j.net> |
"Jeßus" <j@j.net> wrote in message news:1lg4ccd7f7rp0eoi0co8bs57vplpo265n2@j.net... > On Fri, 10 Mar 2017 15:32:47 +1000, Allan Barker > <allanbarker75@optusnet.com.au> wrote: > >>On Fri, 10 Mar 2017 13:41:52 +1100, "Rod Speed" >><rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>>"Jeßus" <j@j.net> wrote in message >>>news:cch3ccho4e94k69b7r9pu1k38qol3a8bjc@j.net... >>>> On Fri, 10 Mar 2017 01:41:06 +1100, "Damian" <damian_n@yahoo.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>>Does that include illegal backyard brewing? :)) >>>> >>>> No such thing, you mean illegal distilling. >>> >>>Nothing illegal about my distilling, I do >>>that to get the fluoride out of the tap water. >> >>Distilation of alcohol comes under federal law, and it's quite legal >>to distil alcohol providing your pot still is no larger than 5 liters. >>I'm not sure about the legal size of reflux stills. >> Most of the brew >>shops sell them. Strictly speaking, pot stills larger than 5l are >>illegal, but I've had a 20l for more than 20 years. I bought it at a >>brew shop, and i've seen plenty for sale. > > *with the caveat that I haven't checked the laws in a few years: > > It's legal to *buy* a still of no larger than 5L in capacity (I'm well > aware that larger stills are commonly available to buy, but they don't > seem to police it) but it is *not* legal to distill *any* quantity of > alcohol without the proper licenses/permits. For one thing, you're > meant to pay excise duty on any spirits that are produced in Aus and > to do that you require a licence. > > Where fractional freezing fits into all this from a legal > standpoint is interesting, but I suspect the ATO would > argue it is a form of distillation, even though technically it isn't. Doesn't matter what they 'argue' and it isnt them that collects the excise anyway.
Back to aus.computers | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
WikiLeaks Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-03-08 18:52 +1100
Re: WikiLeaks "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-03-08 20:46 +1100
Re: WikiLeaks Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-03-08 21:53 +1100
Re: WikiLeaks SolomonW <SolomonW@citi.com> - 2017-03-09 20:46 +1100
Re: WikiLeaks "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-03-10 05:28 +1100
Re: WikiLeaks Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-03-10 06:19 +1100
Re: WikiLeaks SolomonW <SolomonW@citi.com> - 2017-03-11 23:43 +1100
Re: WikiLeaks "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-03-12 04:41 +1100
Re: WikiLeaks Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-03-12 10:26 +1100
Re: WikiLeaks SolomonW <SolomonW@citi.com> - 2017-03-13 14:56 +1100
Re: WikiLeaks "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-03-14 05:00 +1100
Re: WikiLeaks Jeßus <j@j.net> - 2017-03-10 08:12 +1100
Re: WikiLeaks SolomonW <SolomonW@citi.com> - 2017-03-11 23:39 +1100
Re: WikiLeaks "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-03-12 04:38 +1100
Re: WikiLeaks SolomonW <SolomonW@citi.com> - 2017-03-13 16:01 +1100
Re: WikiLeaks "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-03-14 05:06 +1100
Re: WikiLeaks SolomonW <SolomonW@citi.com> - 2017-03-14 20:47 +1100
Re: WikiLeaks "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-03-15 04:02 +1100
Re: WikiLeaks Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-03-15 07:05 +1100
Re: WikiLeaks Jeßus <j@j.net> - 2017-03-12 08:26 +1100
Re: WikiLeaks SolomonW <SolomonW@citi.com> - 2017-03-13 16:01 +1100
Re: WikiLeaks Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-03-13 16:54 +1100
Re: WikiLeaks SolomonW <SolomonW@citi.com> - 2017-03-14 20:12 +1100
Re: WikiLeaks "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-03-14 05:07 +1100
Re: WikiLeaks Jeßus <j@j.net> - 2017-03-14 08:47 +1100
Re: WikiLeaks "Damian" <damian_n@yahoo.com> - 2017-03-10 01:41 +1100
Re: WikiLeaks Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-03-10 04:21 +1100
Re: WikiLeaks "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-03-10 05:30 +1100
Re: WikiLeaks Jeßus <j@j.net> - 2017-03-10 08:14 +1100
Re: WikiLeaks Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-03-10 08:30 +1100
Re: WikiLeaks Jeßus <j@j.net> - 2017-03-10 08:59 +1100
Re: WikiLeaks "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-03-10 13:41 +1100
Re: WikiLeaks Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-03-10 14:53 +1100
Re: WikiLeaks "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-03-10 20:17 +1100
Re: WikiLeaks Allan Barker <allanbarker75@optusnet.com.au> - 2017-03-10 15:32 +1000
Re: WikiLeaks Jeßus <j@j.net> - 2017-03-10 17:21 +1100
Re: WikiLeaks Allan Barker <allanbarker75@optusnet.com.au> - 2017-03-10 17:35 +1000
Re: WikiLeaks Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-03-10 19:52 +1100
Re: WikiLeaks Jeßus <j@j.net> - 2017-03-11 08:13 +1100
Re: WikiLeaks "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-03-10 20:25 +1100
Re: WikiLeaks Allan Barker <allanbarker75@optusnet.com.au> - 2017-03-12 22:20 +1000
Re: WikiLeaks Jeßus <j@j.net> - 2017-03-11 08:09 +1100
Re: WikiLeaks F Murtz <haggisz@hotmail.com> - 2017-03-10 19:55 +1100
Re: WikiLeaks Jeßus <j@j.net> - 2017-03-11 08:19 +1100
Re: WikiLeaks "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-03-10 20:22 +1100
Re: WikiLeaks "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-03-10 20:20 +1100
Re: WikiLeaks not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2017-03-11 07:00 +0000
Re: WikiLeaks not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2017-03-11 06:32 +0000
Re: WikiLeaks "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2017-03-11 19:46 +1100
Re: WikiLeaks not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2017-03-11 06:56 +0000
Re: WikiLeaks Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2017-03-11 21:55 +1100
csiph-web