Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > aus.computers > #48367
| From | "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | aus.computers |
| Subject | Re: hard drive |
| Date | 2015-10-06 19:27 +1100 |
| Message-ID | <d7hevfFp495U1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (6 earlier) <mus9c3$sjh$1@speranza.aioe.org> <mutv3a$6v0$1@dont-email.me> <muvat7$fis$1@speranza.aioe.org> <muvo7k$fqd$2@dont-email.me> <d7h83mFndf4U1@mid.individual.net> |
"felix_unger" <me@nothere.biz> wrote in message news:d7h83mFndf4U1@mid.individual.net... > On 06-October-2015 5:05 PM, Xeno wrote: >> On 6/10/2015 1:16 PM, Max wrote: >>> >>> "Xeno" <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message >>> news:mutv3a$6v0$1@dont-email.me... >>>> On 5/10/2015 9:31 AM, Computer Nerd Kev wrote: >>>>> Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> wrote: >>>>>> On 5/10/2015 8:03 AM, felix_unger wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> like everything else all depends on usage. I have drives that are 10 >>>>>>> years old still going strong >>>>>>> >>>>>> True but I'm not talking about drives stuck in a cupboard somewhere. >>>>>> My >>>>>> drives in computers get used regularly. Backup drives not so much. >>>>> >>>>> Coming to you from an approx. 20yr old 2.1GB HDD (really, my >>>>> newsreader >>>>> needs to save posts to disk before sending). I'd give you an accurate >>>>> date, but it doesn't do much SMART, so I'd have to take it out to get >>>>> the >>>>> date/model. It probably did spend a decade or so in storage before I >>>>> put >>>>> it in, but the other ~1.2GB one is the original 1995 era one which >>>>> boots >>>>> Windows 98. Though I have it on a switch which I leave off when >>>>> booting >>>>> to Linux, which is most of the time. >>>>> >>>>> Actually I can get the model info from the IDE data. Western Digital >>>>> Caviar AC - 22100, but Optus seems to have stoped the domain of my >>>>> usual HDD dating resource from resolving, so still no date. I'll have >>>>> to start using a proxy if this keeps up... >>>>> >>>> I have such drives in my junk box. Maybe I should say 'had'! Smallest >>>> might be 20 or 30 meg, possibly some larger, a mixed bag. Problem I >>>> have is that some have an ST506 interface, some SCSI, Some ESDI. Most >>>> are full and half height 5.25 drives, doorstops in this day and age.. >>>> NONE of my current computers have a compatible interface so what use >>>> are they? Looking at this discussion, I thought I may as well bin them >>>> since I will never use them again, even had I the means to connect >>>> them to something. They are currently in with the garbage and will be >>>> gone before the morning light. >>>> >>>> Even have some low capacity IDE drives - 850 Meg, 1.2 GB and so on. >>>> These, I suspect, will be next for the bin. It would be easier to use >>>> a bootable flash drive as it would be faster, more compact and have >>>> more and cheaper storage capacity. >>>> >>>> There comes a time when one needs to shed the attachment to 'mementos' >>>> of a technical nature. I've cleaned out a lot in the past 2 or 3 years >>>> and have decided that if it hasn't been used for 10 years, colour it >>>> gone. I had 3 SANs, two have gone, one needs to have some data >>>> retrieved and it too will be gone. I think it has a pair of 500GB WD >>>> drives in it. They might end up recycled or given away. >>>> >>> >>> Why would you throw away a 500GB drive. >> >> I said recycle or give away. I did not say 'throw away'. >> >>> That is the standard these days. >> >> My minimum standard now is one or two TB. >> >> > > But what he's saying is that 500gb is pretty much the norm these days for > "off the shelf" PC's, He said nothing of the sort. > and it is Nope.
Back to aus.computers | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
hard drive "Max" <max@val.morgan> - 2015-10-04 12:59 +0800
Re: hard drive Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2015-10-04 16:06 +1100
Re: hard drive Clocky <notgonna@happen.com> - 2015-10-04 14:00 +0800
Re: hard drive "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-10-04 17:51 +1100
Re: hard drive "Max" <max@val.morgan> - 2015-10-04 18:13 +0800
Re: hard drive Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2015-10-04 22:16 +1100
Re: hard drive "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-10-05 03:49 +1100
Re: hard drive felix_unger <me@nothere.biz> - 2015-10-05 08:03 +1100
Re: hard drive felix_unger <me@nothere.biz> - 2015-10-05 08:19 +1100
Re: hard drive Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2015-10-05 08:20 +1100
Re: hard drive not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2015-10-04 22:31 +0000
Re: hard drive felix_unger <me@nothere.biz> - 2015-10-05 11:18 +1100
Re: hard drive not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2015-10-05 22:40 +0000
Re: hard drive Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2015-10-06 00:50 +1100
Re: hard drive not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2015-10-05 22:54 +0000
Re: hard drive Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2015-10-06 10:18 +1100
Re: hard drive Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> - 2015-10-06 01:58 +0000
Re: hard drive Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2015-10-06 17:02 +1100
Re: hard drive "Max" <max@val.morgan> - 2015-10-06 10:16 +0800
Re: hard drive "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-10-06 14:59 +1100
Re: hard drive Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2015-10-06 17:05 +1100
Re: hard drive felix_unger <me@nothere.biz> - 2015-10-06 17:30 +1100
Re: hard drive Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2015-10-06 17:50 +1100
Re: hard drive felix_unger <me@nothere.biz> - 2015-10-06 20:30 +1100
Re: hard drive "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-10-06 19:27 +1100
Re: hard drive felix_unger <me@nothere.biz> - 2015-10-05 10:47 +1100
Re: hard drive "SG1" <lost@the.races.com> - 2015-10-05 12:44 +1000
Re: hard drive felix_unger <me@nothere.biz> - 2015-10-05 18:53 +1100
Re: hard drive not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2015-10-05 22:56 +0000
Re: hard drive Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2015-10-06 10:01 +1100
Re: hard drive Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> - 2015-10-06 01:40 +0000
Re: hard drive felix_unger <me@nothere.biz> - 2015-10-06 10:15 +1100
Re: hard drive Computer Nerd Kev <not@telling.you.invalid> - 2015-10-06 01:43 +0000
Re: hard drive felix_unger <me@nothere.biz> - 2015-10-06 16:20 +1100
Re: hard drive Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2015-10-06 17:06 +1100
Re: hard drive felix_unger <me@nothere.biz> - 2015-10-06 17:31 +1100
Re: hard drive Xeno <xenolith@optusnet.com.au> - 2015-10-06 17:53 +1100
Re: hard drive not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2015-10-06 21:18 +0000
Re: hard drive Clocky <notgonna@happen.com> - 2015-10-08 07:59 +0800
Re: hard drive Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2015-10-06 18:46 +0000
Re: hard drive not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2015-10-06 21:15 +0000
Re: hard drive felix_unger <me@nothere.biz> - 2015-10-07 10:12 +1100
Re: hard drive Clocky <notgonna@happen.com> - 2015-10-08 08:01 +0800
Re: hard drive "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-10-08 16:08 +1100
Re: hard drive "SG1" <lost@the.races.com> - 2015-10-08 15:18 +1000
Re: hard drive "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-10-08 17:07 +1100
Re: hard drive "SG1" <lost@the.races.com> - 2015-10-08 19:33 +1000
Re: hard drive "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-10-08 20:52 +1100
Re: hard drive felix_unger <me@nothere.biz> - 2015-10-08 19:01 +1100
Re: hard drive "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-10-08 15:55 +1100
Re: hard drive Clocky <notgonna@happen.com> - 2015-10-04 21:38 +0800
Re: hard drive "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-10-05 03:47 +1100
Re: hard drive Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2015-10-04 19:22 +1100
Re: hard drive "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-10-04 19:56 +1100
Re: hard drive Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2015-10-05 13:10 +1100
Re: hard drive "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-10-05 14:24 +1100
Re: hard drive Petzl <petzlx@gmail.com> - 2015-10-05 23:32 +1100
Re: hard drive "Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> - 2015-10-06 12:12 +1100
csiph-web