Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.os.linux > #81666
| From | "J.O. Aho" <user@example.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.os.linux |
| Subject | Re: GlusterFS with replica 3 |
| Date | 2025-07-05 17:25 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <mcsufnFrabgU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <104ahej$1bgnt$1@dont-email.me> |
On 05/07/2025 08.41, ^Bart wrote: > I have a cluster with the latest GlusterFS on Debian12 with three nodes > but when I try a simple du -sh of the /var/www the node went in "N" > state and it doesn't come back to Y so I need to manually restart > glusterd daemon. Have you seen anything in the logs? Maybe check /var/log/glusterfs/glusterd.log It can be lock that hasn't been released, sadly only fix is to restart glusterd. > If I don't run backup, rsync, du, etc. the cluster works well, I used > also vmstat to see ram, cpu and disk; I have 4 vcpu 70% and 8GB of ram > for each node, free ram is roughly of 300MB, used about 1,5GB and > buffer/cache about 5GB. It's quite many years since I used GlusterFS, but back then at work we had quite large DELL servers (64GB RAM, 2 CPU with 8 cores each) with SAN based storage as nodes, the system got degradation with having high read/write. In the end those was replaced by standard NFS servers which gave more stability and then have replication from one SAN to another, sure not a fully HA solution. I think I should have pushed more for Lustre and the guys at CERN were really helpful when I did some testing with just a simple setup which needed a bit more nodes, sadly the requirements changed on the way that made we needed to provide the file system to a closed source operating system with poor file system support. > I read on internet AWS starts from 16GB of ram for GlusterFS, other > documents said to use 12GB of ram, do you have experience about it? gluster.org do write, for basic nodes: 2 CPU’s, 4GB of RAM each, 1 Gigabit network. -- //Aho
Back to alt.os.linux | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
GlusterFS with replica 3 ^Bart <none@none.it> - 2025-07-05 08:41 +0200
Re: GlusterFS with replica 3 Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-07-05 07:18 +0000
Re: GlusterFS with replica 3 Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> - 2025-07-05 20:08 +1000
Re: GlusterFS with replica 3 vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2025-07-06 02:09 +0000
Re: GlusterFS with replica 3 Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2025-07-06 04:12 -0400
Re: GlusterFS with replica 3 "J.O. Aho" <user@example.net> - 2025-07-05 17:25 +0200
Re: GlusterFS with replica 3 ^Bart <none@none.it> - 2025-07-07 22:52 +0200
Re: GlusterFS with replica 3 "J.O. Aho" <user@example.net> - 2025-07-08 09:10 +0200
Re: GlusterFS with replica 3 ^Bart <none@none.it> - 2025-10-26 21:25 +0100
Re: GlusterFS with replica 3 Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-10-26 20:56 +0000
Re: GlusterFS with replica 3 Joerg Walther <joerg.walther@magenta.de> - 2025-10-27 17:40 +0100
Re: GlusterFS with replica 3 Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-10-27 21:15 +0000
Re: GlusterFS with replica 3 "J.O. Aho" <user@example.net> - 2025-10-28 09:10 +0100
Re: GlusterFS with replica 3 Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-10-28 23:09 +0000
csiph-web