Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register
Groups > alt.os.linux > #81977
| From | "J.O. Aho" <user@example.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.os.linux |
| Subject | Re: GlusterFS with replica 3 |
| Date | 2025-10-28 09:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <mmbc39Fhe4qU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <md3ujuF237aU1@mid.individual.net> <10dm04f$8psm$1@dont-email.me> <10dm1tg$98dl$2@dont-email.me> <e18vfkpi8i3tuv57j1hb8l4qcfg2ldj0qe@joergwalther.my-fqdn.de> <10dond9$17dho$3@dont-email.me> |
On 27/10/2025 22.15, Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote: > On Mon, 27 Oct 2025 17:40:28 +0100, Joerg Walther wrote: > >> Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote: >> >>> I’ve been setting up WordPress for a client, and it’s funny how >>> sluggish it is, immediately after you have got it going, before you >>> have even done any actual work with it. >> >> Shared hosting most likely? > > Nope. Dedicated in-house VM, on pretty decent hardware (lots of RAM > and disk, CPU cores in the dozens) under XCP-ng. It's not that much about how much the host machine has, it's how much you assigned the VM and of course if you have over provisioned > There are other > company intranet apps running on other VMs, written (by me) in both > PHP and Python, and they all work much more snappily than WordPress. Are they at the same size and as much db dependent as WP? Also the database may be the bottle neck, as I don't know anything of your setup it's difficult to just say what could be wrong... There are so much more that can be different in a VM compared to run it on bare metal, for example memcached had big issues some years ago when run in a VM, it just was extremely slow, on a smaller bare metal instance it was snappy as hell. The reason was how the memory was handled in the by the virtualization. -- //Aho
Back to alt.os.linux | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
GlusterFS with replica 3 ^Bart <none@none.it> - 2025-07-05 08:41 +0200
Re: GlusterFS with replica 3 Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-07-05 07:18 +0000
Re: GlusterFS with replica 3 Daniel70 <daniel47@eternal-september.org> - 2025-07-05 20:08 +1000
Re: GlusterFS with replica 3 vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2025-07-06 02:09 +0000
Re: GlusterFS with replica 3 Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2025-07-06 04:12 -0400
Re: GlusterFS with replica 3 "J.O. Aho" <user@example.net> - 2025-07-05 17:25 +0200
Re: GlusterFS with replica 3 ^Bart <none@none.it> - 2025-07-07 22:52 +0200
Re: GlusterFS with replica 3 "J.O. Aho" <user@example.net> - 2025-07-08 09:10 +0200
Re: GlusterFS with replica 3 ^Bart <none@none.it> - 2025-10-26 21:25 +0100
Re: GlusterFS with replica 3 Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-10-26 20:56 +0000
Re: GlusterFS with replica 3 Joerg Walther <joerg.walther@magenta.de> - 2025-10-27 17:40 +0100
Re: GlusterFS with replica 3 Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-10-27 21:15 +0000
Re: GlusterFS with replica 3 "J.O. Aho" <user@example.net> - 2025-10-28 09:10 +0100
Re: GlusterFS with replica 3 Lawrence D’Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-10-28 23:09 +0000
csiph-web