Re: recommended slicers for 3D printer and 'filled' volume estimation (drivers, consumes and so)

From	5GyYap52yQ1UGMWD <ehj46PkBWfBAng9C@VW28LtWn6wknpUMV.invalid>
Newsgroups	alt.os.linux
Subject	Re: recommended slicers for 3D printer and 'filled' volume estimation (drivers, consumes and so)
Organization	OKjKuDVJ4vdFoLY3
References	(5 earlier) <slrnthu2fq.2e4.dan@djph.net> <87h71cg1qn.fsf@sjc.flh> <tfnrva$2ag2f$1@dont-email.me> <87a674f6n1.fsf@sjc.flh> <tfpav3$2hcli$1@dont-email.me>
Message-ID	<8735cvfz40.fsf@sjc.flh> (permalink)
Date	2022-09-13 16:38 +0800

Show all headers | View raw

Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> writes:

> On 9/12/2022 8:41 PM, 5GyYap52yQ1UGMWD wrote:
>> Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> writes:
>>>
>>> https://www.anandtech.com/show/17218/intels-next-gen-bitcoin-asic-called-bzm2-built-on-7nm-137-gigahashsec-at-25-w
>>>
>> That's cool.
>> What I find interesting, though, is  that intel is getting into the
>> ASIC
>> game. I  wonder what  people will  think of that.  Maybe the  prices for
>> these things will  slowly drop as bigger  manufacturers produce hardware
>> for these applications.
>
> To Intel, that project is just something to fill a few slots
> in the fab production schedule. Same as their GPU business.
>
> The Bitcoin chips are interesting, because not only have they
> managed to convince someone to buy some of the chips for
> box manufacturing. They also look to be using the Bitcoin
> chips as fab "pipe cleaner" designs. When tuning a process for
> yield, you need a test chip, and normal test chips are pretty
> boring. Why not make a test chip... you can sell. I can see
> the attraction there.
>
>    Paul
>

That's interesting. It's nice to see it from that perspective.

-- 
Pointless meanderings in a bleak and lonely world.

Back to alt.os.linux | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

[crosspost] recommended slicers for 3D printer and 'filled' volume estimation (drivers, consumes and so) Soviet_Mario <SovietMario@CCCP.MIR> - 2022-09-07 14:13 +0200
  Re: [crosspost] recommended slicers for 3D printer and 'filled' volume estimation (drivers, consumes and so) Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2022-09-07 13:18 +0000
    Re: [crosspost] recommended slicers for 3D printer and 'filled' volume estimation (drivers, consumes and so) Soviet_Mario <SovietMario@CCCP.MIR> - 2022-09-08 00:39 +0200
      Re: [crosspost] recommended slicers for 3D printer and 'filled' volume estimation (drivers, consumes and so) Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2022-09-09 12:18 +0000
  Re: recommended slicers for 3D printer and 'filled' volume estimation (drivers, consumes and so) "J.O. Aho" <user@example.net> - 2022-09-07 16:51 +0200
    Re: recommended slicers for 3D printer and 'filled' volume estimation (drivers, consumes and so) Soviet_Mario <SovietMario@CCCP.MIR> - 2022-09-08 00:42 +0200
      Re: recommended slicers for 3D printer and 'filled' volume estimation (drivers, consumes and so) "J.O. Aho" <user@example.net> - 2022-09-08 07:56 +0200
      Re: recommended slicers for 3D printer and 'filled' volume estimation (drivers, consumes and so) Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2022-09-09 11:34 +0000
        Re: recommended slicers for 3D printer and 'filled' volume estimation (drivers, consumes and so) Aragorn <telcontar@duck.com> - 2022-09-09 19:08 +0200
          Re: recommended slicers for 3D printer and 'filled' volume estimation (drivers, consumes and so) Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2022-09-12 10:28 +0000
            Re: recommended slicers for 3D printer and 'filled' volume estimation (drivers, consumes and so) "J.O. Aho" <user@example.net> - 2022-09-12 14:36 +0200
            Re: recommended slicers for 3D printer and 'filled' volume estimation (drivers, consumes and so) 5GyYap52yQ1UGMWD <ehj46PkBWfBAng9C@VW28LtWn6wknpUMV.invalid> - 2022-09-12 21:29 +0800
              Re: recommended slicers for 3D printer and 'filled' volume estimation (drivers, consumes and so) Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2022-09-12 13:58 -0400
                Re: recommended slicers for 3D printer and 'filled' volume estimation (drivers, consumes and so) 5GyYap52yQ1UGMWD <ehj46PkBWfBAng9C@VW28LtWn6wknpUMV.invalid> - 2022-09-13 08:41 +0800
                Re: recommended slicers for 3D printer and 'filled' volume estimation (drivers, consumes and so) Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2022-09-13 03:20 -0400
                Re: recommended slicers for 3D printer and 'filled' volume estimation (drivers, consumes and so) 5GyYap52yQ1UGMWD <ehj46PkBWfBAng9C@VW28LtWn6wknpUMV.invalid> - 2022-09-13 16:38 +0800
            Re: recommended slicers for 3D printer and 'filled' volume estimation (drivers, consumes and so) Aragorn <telcontar@duck.com> - 2022-09-12 20:58 +0200
              Re: recommended slicers for 3D printer and 'filled' volume estimation (drivers, consumes and so) Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2022-09-13 10:12 +0000
  Re: [crosspost] recommended slicers for 3D printer and 'filled' volume? estimation (drivers, consumes and so) Robert Heller <heller@deepsoft.com> - 2022-09-07 15:23 +0000
    Re: [crosspost] recommended slicers for 3D printer and 'filled' volume? estimation (drivers, consumes and so) Soviet_Mario <SovietMario@CCCP.MIR> - 2022-09-08 00:43 +0200
  Re: [crosspost] recommended slicers for 3D printer and 'filled' volume estimation (drivers, consumes and so) not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2022-09-08 09:50 +1000
    Re: [crosspost] recommended slicers for 3D printer and 'filled' volume estimation (drivers, consumes and so) Soviet_Mario <SovietMario@CCCP.MIR> - 2022-09-08 03:18 +0200

csiph-web