Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register


Groups > alt.comp.software.firefox > #233

Re: Current profile [OT]

From jeff Layman <jeff@invalid.invalid>
Newsgroups alt.comp.software.firefox
Subject Re: Current profile [OT]
Date 2021-04-15 16:14 +0100
Message-ID <s59l95$7bd$1@solani.org> (permalink)
References (5 earlier) <idomtdFlfvkU1@mid.individual.net> <idp2vtFnp2bU1@mid.individual.net> <s57lnm$ves$1@dont-email.me> <s57omg$ouc$1@dont-email.me> <s57vn5$9sj$1@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw


On 15/04/2021 01:00, Jeff Barnett wrote:
> On 4/14/2021 4:00 PM, Dave Royal wrote:
>> On 14 Apr 2021 15:10:12 -0600 Jeff Barnett wrote:
>>> [On 4/14/2021 2:52 PM, Ken Blake wrote:]
>>>> On 4/14/2021 1:43 PM, WaltS48 wrote:
>>>>> On 4/14/21 1:26 PM, s|b wrote:
>>>>>> On Wed, 14 Apr 2021 10:21:06 -0400, WaltS48 wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Replaced Pan on my systems ages ago.
>>>>>> Pan isn't that bad.
>>
>> I used Pan for several years when I stopped using SeaMonkey. It has a
>> decent scoring system and sub-thread handling. It was fine, but a year
>> or two ago on my xfce system it became buggy - the GUI part. Wouldn't
>> stay the same size - went off the edge of the display. I still use it
>> occasionally. I've also tried XPN, knode, and sylpheed among GUI
>> clients but generally use tin on Linux and SFOS.
>>>
>>> What you say is indeed the common (and I believe, accurate) view of
>>> traditional newsgroup rules. However, I have always mused about whether
>>> this makes sense in groups dealing with products that deploy HTML, e.g.,
>>> TB and FF groups. How much easier is it to present a problem in HTML if
>>> it is involved with that problem?
>>>
>> But some newsreaders cannot read html. It's not a requirement of an NNTP
>> client. I'm only seeing and responding to the plain text. So it may be
>> easier to present the problem, but some readers will find it difficult
>> to understand.
>>
>> Usernet is a plain text system. If you want or need to use html, use a
>> forum. I like usernet - but I'm happy to use forums too.

> The Mozilla newsgroups recently killed were plain text too. 

No they weren't. If you look at m.s.f and m.s.t on the news.mozilla.org 
server (they are still there for reading), you will find several posts 
in HTML by Good Guy in both of them. If only plain text had been 
allowed, Chris Ilias would not have let them through.

-- 

Jeff

Back to alt.comp.software.firefox | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

Current profile Jeff Barnett <jbb@notatt.com> - 2021-04-10 18:04 -0600
  Re: Current profile "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> - 2021-04-11 00:18 +0000
  Re: Current profile dillinger <dillinger@invalid.not> - 2021-04-11 02:26 +0200
  Re: Current profile Dave <dave@triffid.co.uk> - 2021-04-11 07:05 +0100
    Re: Current profile Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2021-04-11 09:40 +0100
    Re: Current profile WaltS48 <schw01@invalid.net> - 2021-04-11 09:23 -0400
      Re: Current profile Dave <dave@triffid.co.uk> - 2021-04-11 15:17 +0100
      Re: Current profile Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2021-04-11 15:38 +0100
      Re: Current profile [OT] "s|b" <me@privacy.invalid> - 2021-04-14 15:59 +0200
        Re: Current profile [OT] "s|b" <me@privacy.invalid> - 2021-04-14 19:26 +0200
          Re: Current profile [OT] Ken Blake <ken@invalidemail.com> - 2021-04-14 13:52 -0700
            Re: Current profile [OT] WaltS48 <schw01@invalid.net> - 2021-04-14 16:59 -0400
              Re: Current profile [OT] Dave Royal<dave@dave123royal.com> - 2021-04-14 21:32 +0000
              Re: Current profile [OT] "s|b" <me@privacy.invalid> - 2021-04-15 21:48 +0200
                Re: Current profile [OT] Dave <dave@triffid.co.uk> - 2021-04-16 07:21 +0100
                Re: Current profile [OT] "s|b" <me@privacy.invalid> - 2021-04-17 15:55 +0200
                Re: Current profile [OT] WaltS48 <schw01@invalid.net> - 2021-04-17 10:17 -0400
              Re: Current profile [OT] Ken Whiton <kenwhiton@surfglobal.net.INVAL> - 2021-04-15 23:17 -0400
            Re: Current profile [OT] Jeff Barnett <jbb@notatt.com> - 2021-04-14 15:10 -0600
              Re: Current profile [OT] Dave Royal<dave@dave123royal.com> - 2021-04-14 22:00 +0000
                Re: Current profile [OT] WaltS48 <schw01@invalid.net> - 2021-04-14 18:21 -0400
                Re: Current profile [OT] "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> - 2021-04-14 23:41 +0000
                Re: Current profile [OT] WaltS48 <schw01@invalid.net> - 2021-04-14 20:39 -0400
                Re: Current profile [OT] "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> - 2021-04-15 01:25 +0000
                Re: Current profile [OT] Sailfish <NIXCAPSsailfish@NIXCAPSunforgettable.com> - 2021-04-14 17:44 -0700
                Re: Current profile [OT] Ken Blake <ken@invalidemail.com> - 2021-04-14 16:25 -0700
                Re: Current profile [OT] Jeff Barnett <jbb@notatt.com> - 2021-04-14 18:00 -0600
                Re: Current profile [OT] "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> - 2021-04-15 00:27 +0000
                Re: Current profile [OT] Dave Royal<dave@dave123royal.com> - 2021-04-15 06:48 +0000
                Re: Current profile [OT] jeff Layman <jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2021-04-15 16:14 +0100
          Re: Current profile [OT] Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2021-04-15 09:44 +0100
            Re: Current profile [OT] Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2021-04-15 09:53 +0100
            Re: Current profile [OT] Dave Royal <dave@dave123royal.com> - 2021-04-15 12:19 +0100
            Re: Current profile [OT] WaltS48 <schw01@invalid.net> - 2021-04-15 08:04 -0400
              Re: Current profile [OT] "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> - 2021-04-15 13:01 +0000
              Re: Current profile [OT] Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2021-04-15 13:59 +0100
              Re: Current profile [OT] Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2021-04-15 23:32 +0000
                Re: Current profile [OT] Ken Blake <ken@invalidemail.com> - 2021-04-15 16:39 -0700
          Re: Current profile [OT] "s|b" <me@privacy.invalid> - 2021-04-15 21:44 +0200
      Re: Current profile Nomen Nescio <nobody@dizum.com> - 2021-04-15 08:11 +0000
    Re: Current profile Jeff Barnett <jbb@notatt.com> - 2021-04-11 11:30 -0600
      Re: Current profile "s|b" <me@privacy.invalid> - 2021-04-14 16:04 +0200
      Re: Current profile Ken Whiton <kenwhiton@surfglobal.net.INVAL> - 2021-04-15 15:26 -0400
    Re: Current profile Sailfish <sailfish@unforgettable.com> - 2021-04-11 19:14 -0700
      Re: Current profile Dave <dave@triffid.co.uk> - 2021-04-12 07:34 +0100
      Re: Current profile Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2021-04-12 10:38 +0100
        Re: Current profile Jeff Layman <jmlayman@invalid.invalid> - 2021-04-12 15:08 +0100
          Re: Current profile Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2021-04-12 15:49 +0100
          Re: Current profile "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> - 2021-04-12 17:29 +0000
            Re: Current profile Jeff Layman <jmlayman@invalid.invalid> - 2021-04-12 22:06 +0100
              Re: Current profile "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> - 2021-04-12 21:28 +0000
                Re: Current profile Mint User <mint@aio3.org> - 2021-04-12 22:48 +0100
                Re: Current profile "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> - 2021-04-12 23:12 +0000
                Re: Current profile WaltS48 <schw01@invalid.net> - 2021-04-12 18:28 -0400
                Re: Current profile "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> - 2021-04-13 12:05 +0000
              Re: Current profile Dave Royal <dave@dave123royal.com> - 2021-04-13 07:25 +0100
            Re: Current profile Dave Royal<dave@dave123royal.com> - 2021-04-13 06:29 +0000
              Re: Current profile Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2021-04-13 08:38 +0100
  Re: Current profile [OT] "s|b" <me@privacy.invalid> - 2021-04-14 16:04 +0200

csiph-web