Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > alt.comp.periphs.scanner > #14

Re: Looking for forum for help with Epson scanner

From none@given
Newsgroups alt.photography, rec.photo.digital, alt.comp.periphs.scanner
Subject Re: Looking for forum for help with Epson scanner
Date 2016-05-01 10:29 +0200
Message-ID <k2fbib1ni4d6o7l8o7g32nf0ot1i85r739@4ax.com> (permalink)
References (6 earlier) <qti7ibh7kgsteh5j6ensolcig44kucfifs@4ax.com> <290420161833064633%nospam@nospam.invalid> <qqg8ib9feodf6l6vdacljrklipe4dk1rej@4ax.com> <300420160820537794%nospam@nospam.invalid> <ng2ic3$1lh5$1@gioia.aioe.org>

Cross-posted to 3 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


On Sat, 30 Apr 2016 11:18:28 -0400, Ken Hart <kwhart1@frontier.com> >>
what matters is the film formulation, not how big or small it is.
>>
>
>The film formulation may be the issue. The pocket instamatic was 
>introduced in 1972. Kodak also introduced C-41 process film in the same 
>year. Some film manufacturers "didn't get the memo", and made 110 film 
>in the older C-22 process. Some early processors of C-41 film also might 
>not have gotten the memo, and may have had some growing pains with the 
>C-41 process.
>
>So it is possible that the OP is comparing C-22 process film with C-41 
>film, or it is possible that the "lab" that processed his film was using 
>the wrong process or the correct process incorrectly ("Fixer is fixer- 
>let's not waste this C-22 fixer- we'll just mix it with the C-41 stuff!")
>
>In order to say that 110 film faded more or the same as other film 
>sizes, more information is needed, to be sure that the comparison is valid.

This is quite probable. 

That said, the core point is that when scanning  110, these issues are
made more tryng by that format's tiny size and fiddly handling when it
comes to scanning negatives. Not least when the film is no longer
perfectly flat.

This is why in my opinion, it pays to invest the small sum for a
specialized film holder for the purpose rather than trying to wing it
with crude workarounds and bodges.   At the very least, you start off
with the best scan you can get out of it.


Back to alt.comp.periphs.scanner | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

Re: Looking for forum for help with Epson scanner android <here@there.was> - 2016-04-28 10:53 +0200
  Re: Looking for forum for help with Epson scanner none@given - 2016-04-29 09:08 +0200
    Re: Looking for forum for help with Epson scanner none@given - 2016-04-29 09:12 +0200
      Re: Looking for forum for help with Epson scanner android <here@there.was> - 2016-04-29 12:23 +0200
        Re: Looking for forum for help with Epson scanner none@given - 2016-04-29 23:10 +0200
          Re: Looking for forum for help with Epson scanner nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-04-29 18:33 -0400
            Re: Looking for forum for help with Epson scanner none@given - 2016-04-30 07:39 +0200
              Re: Looking for forum for help with Epson scanner nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-04-30 08:20 -0400
                Re: Looking for forum for help with Epson scanner Ken Hart <kwhart1@frontier.com> - 2016-04-30 11:18 -0400
                Re: Looking for forum for help with Epson scanner none@given - 2016-05-01 10:29 +0200
          Re: Looking for forum for help with Epson scanner android <here@there.was> - 2016-05-03 05:13 +0200

csiph-web