Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.photography > #38696
| From | none@given |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.photography, rec.photo.digital, alt.comp.periphs.scanner |
| Subject | Re: Looking for forum for help with Epson scanner |
| Date | 2016-05-01 10:29 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <k2fbib1ni4d6o7l8o7g32nf0ot1i85r739@4ax.com> (permalink) |
| References | (6 earlier) <qti7ibh7kgsteh5j6ensolcig44kucfifs@4ax.com> <290420161833064633%nospam@nospam.invalid> <qqg8ib9feodf6l6vdacljrklipe4dk1rej@4ax.com> <300420160820537794%nospam@nospam.invalid> <ng2ic3$1lh5$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
On Sat, 30 Apr 2016 11:18:28 -0400, Ken Hart <kwhart1@frontier.com> >>
what matters is the film formulation, not how big or small it is.
>>
>
>The film formulation may be the issue. The pocket instamatic was
>introduced in 1972. Kodak also introduced C-41 process film in the same
>year. Some film manufacturers "didn't get the memo", and made 110 film
>in the older C-22 process. Some early processors of C-41 film also might
>not have gotten the memo, and may have had some growing pains with the
>C-41 process.
>
>So it is possible that the OP is comparing C-22 process film with C-41
>film, or it is possible that the "lab" that processed his film was using
>the wrong process or the correct process incorrectly ("Fixer is fixer-
>let's not waste this C-22 fixer- we'll just mix it with the C-41 stuff!")
>
>In order to say that 110 film faded more or the same as other film
>sizes, more information is needed, to be sure that the comparison is valid.
This is quite probable.
That said, the core point is that when scanning 110, these issues are
made more tryng by that format's tiny size and fiddly handling when it
comes to scanning negatives. Not least when the film is no longer
perfectly flat.
This is why in my opinion, it pays to invest the small sum for a
specialized film holder for the purpose rather than trying to wing it
with crude workarounds and bodges. At the very least, you start off
with the best scan you can get out of it.
Back to alt.photography | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Looking for forum for help with Epson scanner tmcdanel@gmail.com - 2016-04-26 12:18 -0700
Re: Looking for forum for help with Epson scanner philo <philo@privacy.net> - 2016-04-26 14:33 -0500
Re: Looking for forum for help with Epson scanner android <here@there.was> - 2016-04-28 10:53 +0200
Re: Looking for forum for help with Epson scanner none@given - 2016-04-29 09:08 +0200
Re: Looking for forum for help with Epson scanner none@given - 2016-04-29 09:12 +0200
Re: Looking for forum for help with Epson scanner android <here@there.was> - 2016-04-29 12:23 +0200
Re: Looking for forum for help with Epson scanner none@given - 2016-04-29 23:10 +0200
Re: Looking for forum for help with Epson scanner nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-04-29 18:33 -0400
Re: Looking for forum for help with Epson scanner none@given - 2016-04-30 07:39 +0200
Re: Looking for forum for help with Epson scanner nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2016-04-30 08:20 -0400
Re: Looking for forum for help with Epson scanner Ken Hart <kwhart1@frontier.com> - 2016-04-30 11:18 -0400
Re: Looking for forum for help with Epson scanner none@given - 2016-05-01 10:29 +0200
Re: Looking for forum for help with Epson scanner android <here@there.was> - 2016-05-03 05:13 +0200
csiph-web