Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > alt.comp.os.windows-10 > #122549

Re: speaking of spammy crossposting....

Cross-posted to 6 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

Gremlin <nobody@haph.org> wrote:
> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
> news:hsqlkfFjriqU2@mid.individual.net Mon, 21 Sep 2020 03:39:59 GMT
> in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: 
> 
>> On Sep 20, 2020 at 2:26:12 PM MST, ""Commander Kinsey""
>> <CFKinsey@military.org.jp> wrote:
> [snip]
> 
>>> Then stop pansying about in telling us what you're up to.
>> 
>> I would prefer for some to not know what I have or have not done.
>> Let them wonder.
> 
> I don't waste the time to wonder about anything you may/may not have
> done. You wouldn't be the first if you did, and I already told you,
> the fbi already knows me. They missed the chance to do a meet in
> greet with me by a few hours, twenty something years ago. For you
> see, simplesnit, I was the individual responsible for providing the
> old codebreakers.org it's final host. The FBI raided the place (no
> pun intended) where I had the gear running at, because another virus
> writer put some code on it that he shouldn't have. Code you might
> know as the Melissa virus. Are you at all familiar with it? It was
> quite popular at one point in time. All over cable tv news networks.
> Quite famous little bug. I made the kingsport times news as a result
> of it, on the front page; lucky for me though, they got my first
> name wrong (didn't know my last one) and my age was a bit off (I've
> always looked young for my age, and that time, it really helped me) 
> 
> Despite the so called 'raiding', the site wasn't shut down by the
> FBI. I let the site admin make the decision on what he wanted to do,
> if he wanted to stay online, I would have continued operating the
> equipment for them. It wasn't illegal, and despite the fact you
> could download melissa virus source from it at the time, that wasn't
> illegal either. The feds did not image the machine; by order of the
> spooky, I remote logged in (sorry, but I got advanced notice and was
> already on the interstate; cat in carrier, computer in the back
> under a tarp with my clothes and some other small items I owned at
> the time - 
> 
> If you guessed I was driving a truck, you get a cookie; it's still
> my preferred method of travel. I own a large one presently with an
> LS series engine, and it's a fucking monster) 
> 
> There's no way to recover data due to the way in which I ordered the
> server to go offline. And again, if spooky wanted to remain online
> instead, It would have. The gear was running an encrypted drive, so
> if you powered it down, reset it, etc, you wouldn't get shit; so he
> could have kept his site up if he wanted. I would have stuck by him.
> He chose to delete his site, so as a precaution, I ordered the
> server to go bye bye to protect the interest of others, remotely; at
> a rest stop. <G> 
> 
>  
>> I cannot deny I have done that at times... but honestly. I do not
>> respond the way they do nor sink to their level. 
> 
> The following urls show otherwise:
> 
> <https://web.archive.org/web/20181028000459/http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snit.html> 
> <https://web.archive.org/web/20190529043314/http://cosmicpenguin.com/snitlist.html> 
> <https://web.archive.org/web/20190529062255/http://cosmicpenguin.com/snitLieMethods.html> 
> 
> I have no issue having an adult conversation with you, if at some
> point you're interested in doing so. If you'd prefer I take the
> advice of hundreds of your detractors and pull hits and runs on you
> instead, I'm okay with that too. It's upto you how interaction takes
> place. 
> 
> Yes, things have been set into motion to make things even between us
> for your doxing efforts- whats done is done. So, we might as well
> move onto other subjects of discussion. If you wish to have mature,
> adult, civil discussions, I don't have a problem with that, and the
> moment one of your replies to me indicates that's the direction you
> wish to go, I can resume using my funny random tagline generator
> instead of the one my client is presently using. I don't mind it,
> but, it's rather dull and boring. I have 12,000+ random ones I could
> be using instead, though. Upto you if/when the present signature
> changes though. 
> 
> Now, you did tell quite a story about me and a certain usenet flood 
> bot, and you falsely accused me of writing a direct lie concerning 
> David Brooks. So, I will continue to ask for the rightful apologies
> that you do owe me for those lies... 
> 
> from time to time, until you apologize for them. Once you do,
> obviously, I can't continue asking about them. Other than that, I
> don't see why you can't have a reasonable conversation with me. The
> balls in your court, of course. I can't make you do anything you
> don't want to do. 
> 
> You see, snit, what started the problem I have with you was the bot
> story you wrote about me. I never had the bot, in any format, I
> wasn't working with the bot owner in any way shape or form, either. 
> 
> For me, what you wrote isn't a little white lie. I've worked hard 
> these past twenty years to distance myself from such things, and 
> there you go, claiming I was affiliated with the 
> creation/improvement of malicious code- when at NO TIME WHATSOEVER
> WAS THAT TRUE! 
> 
> That's the issue  I have with what you did, that's why I'm on your 
> ass about apologizing for it. I realize you don't see what the big 
> deal is, but you don't have the background as I do, you haven't done 
> the things I've done, you don't have the field experience that I 
> have, and you have no concept of integrity - Understandable
> considering the real life conditions you choose to live in. 
> 
> I haven't been affiliated with malicious code of any kind in nearly
> twenty one years now, Michael. So for you to come here and falsely!
> state otherwise, well, yea, that's going to piss me off a little.
> Trying to dox me to shut me up about it - which is what you've been
> doing, does have consequences (no point in going over it all again,
> you'll see soon enough yourself). 
> 
> I feel that you personally tried to harm my reputation by writing
> what you did, and I've worked hard to maintain the reputation I've
> held for nearly twenty one years now. I take your action, quite
> seriously. I know you think it's all a big joke now, but at the end
> of the day, I'm going to get the last laugh at your great expense. 
> 
> Enough of all of that though, we can still have adult conversations
> of other subjects, if you'd like to do so, at some point. 
> 
> 

Maybe if you stop bragging and trying to impress with stories which may or
may not be true, and are irrelevant, you will be able to have an adult
conversation. Good luck Double-Oh. 

-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel
somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks
and ignore the message time and time again.

Back to alt.comp.os.windows-10 | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: speaking of spammy crossposting.... "Commander Kinsey" <CFKinsey@military.org.jp> - 2020-09-20 22:26 +0100
  Re: speaking of spammy crossposting.... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2020-09-21 03:39 +0000
    Re: speaking of spammy crossposting.... "Commander Kinsey" <CFKinsey@military.org.jp> - 2020-09-23 23:05 +0100
      Re: speaking of spammy crossposting.... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2020-09-24 03:02 +0000
        Re: speaking of spammy crossposting.... Gremlin <nobody@haph.org> - 2020-09-25 03:39 +0000
          Re: speaking of spammy crossposting.... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2020-09-25 04:22 +0000
        Re: speaking of spammy crossposting.... "Commander Kinsey" <CFKinsey@military.org.jp> - 2020-09-26 19:05 +0100
    Re: speaking of spammy crossposting.... Gremlin <nobody@haph.org> - 2020-09-25 03:39 +0000
      Re: speaking of spammy crossposting.... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2020-09-25 04:22 +0000
        Re: speaking of spammy crossposting.... Gremlin <nobody@haph.org> - 2020-09-27 01:00 +0000
          Re: speaking of spammy crossposting.... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2020-09-27 01:57 +0000
            Re: speaking of spammy crossposting.... Gremlin <nobody@haph.org> - 2020-09-28 15:34 +0000
          Re: speaking of spammy crossposting.... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2020-09-27 06:09 +0000
            Re: speaking of spammy crossposting.... Gremlin <nobody@haph.org> - 2020-09-28 15:34 +0000
              Re: speaking of spammy crossposting.... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2020-09-28 16:28 +0000
                Re: speaking of spammy crossposting.... Gremlin <nobody@haph.org> - 2020-09-28 20:37 +0000
  Re: speaking of spammy crossposting.... Gremlin <nobody@haph.org> - 2020-09-25 03:39 +0000

csiph-web