Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register

Groups > alt.comp.os.windows-10 > #122550

Re: speaking of spammy crossposting....

Cross-posted to 6 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

Gremlin <nobody@haph.org> wrote:
> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
> news:ht2ghoFq86cU9@mid.individual.net Thu, 24 Sep 2020 03:02:17 GMT
> in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: 
> 
>> Why? Let them sleep and fornicate. Anyway, at least for now the
>> two big troublemakers seem to both be gone. I suspect at least one
>> will be back soon. 
> 
> Hmm. Who is it you're claiming are the trouble makers?
>  
>> I cannot argue against that ... though I will admit I enjoyed some
>> of the recent exchanges. 
> 
> Which ones in particular? Apd's repeated efforts to educate you
> concerning what I actually wrote, vs what you *ERRONEOUSLY* thought
> I wrote?  
> 
>> It was interesting to watch someone self
>> destruct. Not sure that speaks well of me. 
> 
> Michael, if you actually cared about your reputation, you would have done
> something about this:
> <https://web.archive.org/web/20181028000459/http://www.cosmicpenguin.com/snit.html> 
> <https://web.archive.org/web/20190529043314/http://cosmicpenguin.com/snitlist.html> 
> <https://web.archive.org/web/20190529062255/http://cosmicpenguin.com/snitLieMethods.html> 
> 
> A reasonable person, which clearly isn't you, wouldn't go well out
> of his way, as you continue to do to prove that each and every
> single statement in *ALL THREE* urls is the actual, and very sad,
> truth concerning you. That's not logical. 
> 
> You don't care who you lie about, what you lie about concerning 
> them, or who it might harm by lieing as you do. You actually get off 
> on trying to make others on usenet (which is the only place you 
> could get away with any of it) miserable, by repeatedly lying about 
> them, badly enough to try and tarnish their reputations. 
> 
> You're a very sad little boy in real life. Your maturity level
> hasn't reached your chronological age, and it's doubtful due to the
> extensive child abuse you suffered at the hands of your loving mom
> that it ever will. Despite what's happened to you, it doesn't give
> you the right to do what you do towards others. And it never will be
> a justifiable excuse for it. 
> 
> Under normal conditions, based on what I know about you now, I'd 
> feel sorry for you, but, instead, I question why your mom didn't 
> finish you off when she had the chance. The world would have been a 
> slightly better place without you. It really would. She really
> fucked you up, and that's a terrible thing for her to have done, but
> since she fucked you up so badly beyond the point of repair, she
> didn't do you any favors by not going ahead and putting you into the
> ground. Snit, in case you didn't know, your mom did to you what was
> done to her, she learned it by another. And the cycle repeated
> itself. 
> 
> Which means, under most conditions, you'll do the same things to
> your children as your mom if you haven't/don't already, that is.
> Someone probably have a social welfare check done on you. I might do
> that for you myself. I don't feel that your kids are in a safe
> environment. I suspect child abuse. Mental, possible physical. I
> also suspect adult abuse is taking place inside the home. I think
> I'm going to place a call and express my concerns. You clearly
> aren't fucking around. and I would feel bad if you got mad about
> something you read here and took it out on them. 
> 
> I've already heard stories about your lockdown rules. I don't know 
> if that would be child abuse/adult forced imprisonment without legal 
> justification, but at this point, I'd rest easier knowing I placed a 
> call and someone came to talk to you. I think I'll do that first 
> thing in the morning, actually. Something is telling me that because
> of things I've written, you might be taking it out on them; feeling
> as if they exposed you in some manner. They had no idea when making
> social media posts that you'd fuck with someone like me, so you
> can't blame them for what you started. Had you not done what you
> did, I'd never have examined any of their accounts.  
> 
> Michael, you're accountable for your own actions. They have nothing
> to do with the shit you put yourself in here. That's all on you. Was
> it cool of me to take advantage of the social media? yea, I think it
> was ok. That's what social media is for. You cannot censor all
> aspects of your personal life from me obviously. and if you really
> wanted your personal life to remain off usenet, you wouldn't have
> published that number and otherwise tried to dox me. But you did..
> so... 
> 
> I'm going to call your police dept in the morning; so don't do 
> anything to any of your family members that's going to leave a mark 
> of any kind on them tonight when you read this reply. If you do, 
> there's a good chance you'll spend a little time in lockup, and I 
> seriously doubt with your girly aspects and voice that you'll find 
> general population to be a pleasant experience. I personally am okay
> with one or more fellow jailmates doing you bodily harm; I'd be okay
> with that. I might even laugh about it. Just being honest here.  
> 
> All this aside, we can still have adult conversations in the future,
> if you'd like to do so. The first response you provide showing such
> an indication will allow me to forgo using this signature. That's
> the only reason it's present, in case you didn't know. I'd much
> rather be using the random tags instead. 
> 
> 

Why do you advertise your insecurities like that? Weird. 

But I hope you are right and you can some day have an adult conversation.
Good luck Double-Oh. 

-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel
somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks
and ignore the message time and time again.

Back to alt.comp.os.windows-10 | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: speaking of spammy crossposting.... "Commander Kinsey" <CFKinsey@military.org.jp> - 2020-09-20 22:26 +0100
  Re: speaking of spammy crossposting.... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2020-09-21 03:39 +0000
    Re: speaking of spammy crossposting.... "Commander Kinsey" <CFKinsey@military.org.jp> - 2020-09-23 23:05 +0100
      Re: speaking of spammy crossposting.... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2020-09-24 03:02 +0000
        Re: speaking of spammy crossposting.... Gremlin <nobody@haph.org> - 2020-09-25 03:39 +0000
          Re: speaking of spammy crossposting.... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2020-09-25 04:22 +0000
        Re: speaking of spammy crossposting.... "Commander Kinsey" <CFKinsey@military.org.jp> - 2020-09-26 19:05 +0100
    Re: speaking of spammy crossposting.... Gremlin <nobody@haph.org> - 2020-09-25 03:39 +0000
      Re: speaking of spammy crossposting.... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2020-09-25 04:22 +0000
        Re: speaking of spammy crossposting.... Gremlin <nobody@haph.org> - 2020-09-27 01:00 +0000
          Re: speaking of spammy crossposting.... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2020-09-27 01:57 +0000
            Re: speaking of spammy crossposting.... Gremlin <nobody@haph.org> - 2020-09-28 15:34 +0000
          Re: speaking of spammy crossposting.... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2020-09-27 06:09 +0000
            Re: speaking of spammy crossposting.... Gremlin <nobody@haph.org> - 2020-09-28 15:34 +0000
              Re: speaking of spammy crossposting.... Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2020-09-28 16:28 +0000
                Re: speaking of spammy crossposting.... Gremlin <nobody@haph.org> - 2020-09-28 20:37 +0000
  Re: speaking of spammy crossposting.... Gremlin <nobody@haph.org> - 2020-09-25 03:39 +0000

csiph-web