Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.fan.rush-limbaugh > #2467328
| From | Mitch <bankrupt@cnn.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.society.liberalism, alt.atheism, alt.war.civil.usa, alt.politics.democrats.d, talk.politics.guns |
| Subject | Re: "Why the 3/5ths Compromise Was Anti-Slavery" |
| Date | 2021-11-27 21:17 +0000 |
| Organization | dizum.com - The Internet Problem Provider |
| Message-ID | <XnsADEF8741C923B0AR6@0.0.0.0> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <rf4vam$18eq$1@neodome.net> <U5KdnRh3ebKPkYvCnZ2dnUU7-W3NnZ2d@giganews.com> <rf57tp$17hn$2@neodome.net> <ltWdna4F3oBbsYvCnZ2dnUU7-YmdnZ2d@giganews.com> <oSvoJ.60618$lz3.10071@fx34.iad> |
Cross-posted to 6 groups.
On 27 Nov 2021, Rudy Canoza <js@phendrie.con> posted some news:oSvoJ.60618$lz3.10071@fx34.iad: > On 7/20/2020 4:46 PM, David Hartung wrote: >> On 7/20/20 6:04 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>> On 7/20/2020 2:26 PM, David Hartung wrote: >>>> On 7/20/20 3:36 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>> On 7/20/2020 1:12 PM, David Hartung wrote: >>>>>> On 7/20/20 2:57 PM, Rudy Canoza wrote: >>>>>>> On 7/20/2020 12:54 PM, David Hartung wrote: >>>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> No.Ā The 3/5 compromise was *not* anti-slavery.Ā Your subject >>>>>>> line is a lie. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It gave the slavers something they didn't deserve.Ā It was >>>>>>> pro-slavery. >>>>>> >>>>>> Would you rather that the slaves had been counted for >>>>>> representation >>>>> >>>>> If they didn't get to vote, they should not have been counted for >>>>> representation at all. >>>> >>>> Then most of the people in the northern states should not have been >>>> counted. >>> >>> They should have been the same as similarly situated people in the >>> south. >>> >>> Just stop with the bullshit that the 3/5 compromise was >>> "anti-slavery." It was not.Ā It was pro-slavery. >> >> As I said, on this subject you are stupid. > > No. Concession of defeat noted. > > The "compromise" was pro-slavery, in that it gave the slavers > political power they didn't deserve. The slavers were profiteering slaves and white Democrats! During the era of Reconstruction, federal troops stationed in the south helped secure rights for the newly freed slaves. Hundreds of black men were elected to southern state legislatures as Republicans, and 22 black Republicans served in the US Congress by 1900. The Democrats did not elect a black man to Congress until 1935. But after Reconstruction ended, when the federal troops went home, Democrats roared back into power in the South. They quickly reestablished white supremacy across the region with measures like black codes – laws that restricted the ability of blacks to own property and run businesses. And they imposed poll taxes and literacy tests, used to subvert the black citizen’s right to vote. And how was all of this enforced? By terror -- much of it instigated by the Ku Klux Klan, founded by a Democrat, Nathan Bedford Forrest.
Back to alt.fan.rush-limbaugh | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: "Why the 3/5ths Compromise Was Anti-Slavery" Rudy Canoza <js@phendrie.con> - 2021-11-27 11:42 -0800
Re: "Why the 3/5ths Compromise Was Anti-Slavery" Mitch <bankrupt@cnn.com> - 2021-11-27 21:17 +0000
Re: "Why the 3/5ths Compromise Was Anti-Slavery" Rudy Canoza <notgenx32@gmail.com> - 2021-11-27 13:35 -0800
Re: "Why the 3/5ths Compromise Was Anti-Slavery" Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2021-11-28 11:38 -0500
Re: "Why the 3/5ths Compromise Was Anti-Slavery" Rudy Canoza <notgenx32@gmail.com> - 2021-11-28 09:42 -0800
Re: "Why the 3/5ths Compromise Was Anti-Slavery" Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2021-11-28 13:01 -0500
Re: "Why the 3/5ths Compromise Was Anti-Slavery" Rudy Canoza <notgenx32@gmail.com> - 2021-11-28 10:11 -0800
Re: "Why the 3/5ths Compromise Was Anti-Slavery" Klaus Schadenfreude <klaus.schadenfreude.entfernen.@gmail.com> - 2021-11-28 10:19 -0800
Re: "Why the 3/5ths Compromise Was Anti-Slavery" Fred Oinka <FredOinka@invalid.com> - 2021-11-28 13:02 -0700
Re: "Why the 3/5ths Compromise Was Anti-Slavery" Rudy Canoza <notgenx32@gmail.com> - 2021-11-28 12:13 -0800
Re: "Why the 3/5ths Compromise Was Anti-Slavery" Rudy Canoza <notgenx32@gmail.com> - 2021-11-28 15:01 -0800
Re: "Why the 3/5ths Compromise Was Anti-Slavery" Walter Duerson <liars@msnbc.com> - 2021-11-29 02:47 +0000
Re: "Why the 3/5ths Compromise Was Anti-Slavery" Rudy Canoza <notgenx32@gmail.com> - 2021-11-28 19:00 -0800
Re: "Why the 3/5ths Compromise Was Anti-Slavery" Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2021-11-28 18:39 -0500
Re: "Why the 3/5ths Compromise Was Anti-Slavery" Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2021-11-28 18:37 -0500
Re: "Why the 3/5ths Compromise Was Anti-Slavery" Rudy Canoza <notgenx32@gmail.com> - 2021-11-28 16:02 -0800
Re: "Why the 3/5ths Compromise Was Anti-Slavery" Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2021-11-28 20:35 -0500
Re: "Why the 3/5ths Compromise Was Anti-Slavery" Rudy Canoza <notgenx32@gmail.com> - 2021-11-28 17:40 -0800
Re: "Why the 3/5ths Compromise Was Anti-Slavery" Attila <<prochoice@here.now> - 2021-11-29 02:23 -0500
Re: "Why the 3/5ths Compromise Was Anti-Slavery" Fred Oinka <FredOinka@invalid.com> - 2021-11-28 13:01 -0700
Re: "Why the 3/5ths Compromise Was Anti-Slavery" Walter Duerson <liars@msnbc.com> - 2021-11-29 02:29 +0000
Re: "Why the 3/5ths Compromise Was Anti-Slavery" Rudy Canoza <notgenx32@gmail.com> - 2021-11-28 18:54 -0800
csiph-web