Re: A small poll

Path	csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From	David Hume <David.Hume@example.com>
Newsgroups	aioe.system
Subject	Re: A small poll
Date	Sun, 29 Nov 2015 18:53:55 +0000
Organization	Haphazard
Lines	16
Message-ID	<848u5g7i2k.fsf@example.com> (permalink)
References	<n39qh3$mar$1@speranza.aioe.org> <84wpt3a39p.fsf@example.com> <n3f2e0$co0$1@speranza.aioe.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host	52+pFfWrGR5AmW7Rb68DcA.user.speranza.aioe.org
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain
X-Complaints-To	abuse@aioe.org
User-Agent	Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux)
X-No-Archive	Yes
X-Notice	Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2
Cancel-Lock	sha1:naP9eRSO3qUNLybhTQrcOMtJKAY=
Xref	csiph.com aioe.system:53

Show key headers only | View raw

Paolo Amoroso <estasi@aioe.org> writes:

> Il 27/11/2015 16:08, David Hume ha scritto:
>>
>> The ability to cancel posts.
>>
>
> without authentication server can't verify whether an article was sent by the
> one who try to cancel it.
>

Ok well it was just an idea. Here is another idea: Suppose you hid the
cancel-lock header on all the articles, and required it to match in
order to cancel a post. Then in order for someone else to cancel my post
they would have to know my cancel-lock which would be impossible to find
out or guess. Would that work?

Back to aioe.system | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

A small poll Paolo Amoroso <estasi@aioe.org> - 2015-11-27 15:49 +0100
  Re: A small poll David Hume <David.Hume@example.com> - 2015-11-27 15:08 +0000
    Re: A small poll Paolo Amoroso <estasi@aioe.org> - 2015-11-29 15:34 +0100
      Re: A small poll David Hume <David.Hume@example.com> - 2015-11-29 18:53 +0000
  Re: A small poll not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2015-11-28 03:33 +0000
    Re: A small poll Lu Wei <luweitest@address.invalid> - 2015-11-28 16:17 +0800
      Re: A small poll "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> - 2015-11-28 15:22 +0000
    Re: A small poll (yahoo.tekscopes) Paolo Amoroso <estasi@aioe.org> - 2015-11-29 15:54 +0100
  Re: A small poll Lu Wei <luweitest@address.invalid> - 2015-11-28 16:20 +0800
    Re: A small poll "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> - 2015-11-28 15:23 +0000
      Re: A small poll David LaRue <huey.dll@tampabay.rr.com> - 2015-11-29 15:00 +0000
      Re: A small poll nobody@nowhere.com - 2015-11-30 05:04 +0000
        Re: A small poll Paolo Amoroso <estasi@aioe.org> - 2015-11-30 15:06 +0100
          Re: A small poll nobody@nowhere.com - 2015-12-03 07:22 +0000
            about HTML message Lu Wei <luweitest@address.invalid> - 2015-12-08 18:48 +0800
              Re: about HTML message Paolo Amoroso <estasi@aioe.org> - 2015-12-08 17:18 +0100
                Re: about HTML message Lu Wei <luweitest@address.invalid> - 2015-12-09 08:40 +0800
    Re: A small poll Paolo Amoroso <estasi@aioe.org> - 2015-11-29 15:45 +0100
      Re: A small poll Lu Wei <luweitest@address.invalid> - 2015-11-30 13:10 +0800
  Re: A small poll David LaRue <huey.dll@tampabay.rr.com> - 2015-11-29 14:56 +0000
  Re: A small poll nobody@nowhere.com - 2015-11-30 05:47 +0000
    Re: A small poll Paolo Amoroso <estasi@aioe.org> - 2015-11-30 14:48 +0100
  Re: A small poll not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2015-12-02 21:58 +0000
    Re: A small poll Paolo Amoroso <estasi@aioe.org> - 2015-12-05 09:45 +0100

csiph-web