Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | Nobody <nobody@nowhere.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: Text processing |
| Date | 2011-09-26 18:36 +0100 |
| Message-Id | <pan.2011.09.26.17.36.49.141000@nowhere.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| References | <j5pk64$vsu$1@speranza.aioe.org> <mstorkamp-62451D.08340226092011@news.eternal-september.org> |
| Organization | Zen Internet |
On Mon, 26 Sep 2011 08:34:03 -0500, Mark Storkamp wrote: >> A widely used application of text files are program files. Most >> programming languages (and here C is not an exception) store the >> program in text format. > > I'm not sure who your target audience is, but I find this to be less > precise than I believe it should be. I think most people, when they > think of programs, are thinking of the executable binaries, not the > source code. While some languages, like BASIC, and other interpreted > languages do indeed save their programs as text files, C and most others > do not. Another counter-example is that many older dialects of BASIC *didn't* store their programs as text files, but used a tokenised format for the sake of space and performance.
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Text processing jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2011-09-26 12:29 +0200
Re: Text processing Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2011-09-26 13:18 +0100
Re: Text processing jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2011-09-26 17:06 +0200
Re: Text processing Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2011-09-26 19:07 +0100
Re: Text processing "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2011-09-26 16:16 +0100
Re: Text processing Harald van Dijk <truedfx@gmail.com> - 2011-09-26 12:36 -0700
Re: Text processing Harald van Dijk <truedfx@gmail.com> - 2011-09-26 13:33 -0700
Re: Text processing jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2011-09-26 22:45 +0200
Re: Text processing Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2012-03-07 15:48 -0800
Re: Text processing Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2011-09-26 22:58 +0100
Re: Text processing Harald van Dijk <truedfx@gmail.com> - 2011-09-26 15:40 -0700
Re: Text processing Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2011-09-27 01:41 +0100
Re: Text processing Harald van Dijk <truedfx@gmail.com> - 2011-09-26 17:55 -0700
Re: Text processing Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2011-09-27 02:41 +0100
Re: Text processing Harald van Dijk <truedfx@gmail.com> - 2011-09-26 22:56 -0700
Re: Text processing Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2011-09-27 12:51 +0100
Re: Text processing pacman@kosh.dhis.org (Alan Curry) - 2011-09-27 01:05 +0000
Re: Text processing Harald van Dijk <truedfx@gmail.com> - 2011-09-26 18:09 -0700
Re: Text processing James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2011-09-26 21:43 -0400
Re: Text processing Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2011-09-27 02:46 +0100
Re: Text processing Mark Storkamp <mstorkamp@yahoo.com> - 2011-09-26 08:34 -0500
Re: Text processing "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2011-09-26 15:47 +0100
Re: Text processing jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2011-09-26 17:02 +0200
Re: Text processing jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2011-09-26 17:03 +0200
Re: Text processing Nobody <nobody@nowhere.com> - 2011-09-26 18:36 +0100
Re: Text processing hormelfree@gmail.com - 2012-03-07 17:39 -0800
Re: Text processing Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-03-07 19:09 -0800
Re: Text processing pete <pfiland@mindspring.com> - 2011-09-26 19:46 -0400
Re: Text processing Kleuskes & Moos <kleuske@somewhere.else.net> - 2011-09-26 14:02 +0000
Re: Text processing Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-09-26 12:42 -0700
Re: Text processing Ben Pfaff <blp@cs.stanford.edu> - 2011-09-26 11:11 -0700
Re: Text processing jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2011-09-26 21:01 +0200
csiph-web